You can run anything as long as it is OS X

It's my understanding that Apple's Universal Binary will allow developers to write applications which will contain code for both PPC and Intel processors, and then the Installer will just select the correct batch of code for the computer it's running on.

Re: Centrino on Mac Apple doesn't have any WiFi technology of their own. The PowerBooks/iBooks use the Broadcomm chipset, so there's nothing stopping them from going with Centrino/Sonoma in the future.

I'd be alot happier if Rosetta converted code both ways, rather just PPC > Intel. But on a longer term note: This is a very positive move for Apple. It has the potential to give Apple and it's user-base the best of both worlds. Although unsupported, its a strong possibility that Windows will be bootable on future Macs, giving customers a very flexible dual-boot system and I suspect it's an intentional move by Apple (even though not widely publicised) to allow the more stubborn potential switchers the tempting ability to move to MacOS X after really finding it to be a superior product to XP - a masterstroke on Apple's behalf - offering unprecidented choice for people unsure about which computer to buy. Intel's manufacturing may fluctuate, but seeing as though many other PC manufacturers will be affected in the same way, it will allow Apple to compete on a level playing field. Contrary to your report, MacOS X doesn't need to be re-written as it's been secretly compatible with Intel chips for the last five years, according to Apple. One last thing, I'm really happy that Apple is now beginning to get the attention of the average computer enthusiast and offering them ways to embrace the technology in a non-exclusive way. They are now in the best position ever to make MacOS X a REAL alternative to Windows while still keeping control of their special combination as symbiotic Software and Hardware manufacturer. This was once a weakness for Apple, but now with this development, it's definately a strong competitive advantage.

I think Apple needs to ressurect their Switcher web site only this time it should feature people that switched from Macs to PCs. If I'd wanted a computer with Intel inside I'd have bought a PC. Now that I don't really have much of a choice, no matter what I buy it's going to be Intel, I'll just go buy a PC.

I think Apple needs to ressurect their Switcher web site only this time it should feature people that switched from Macs to PCs. If I'd wanted a computer with Intel inside I'd have bought a PC. Now that I don't really have much of a choice, no matter what I buy it's going to be Intel, I'll just go buy a PC.

So, i think that i have to add my thoughts to this posting. Just think people, within two weeks the piece of technology you just bought has been replaced by something newer and better. Dose that mean we have to run out and buy it? I don't think so. And besides, if you are an Apple stock holder this could potentially be a very good thing. For those of you who ask what you should do with the new G5 or iMac or Mac Mini, just think of all the people out there who are still using their Bondi Blue iMac or Powerbook Wallstreet, and then maybe you will think twice about asking if your machine you bought yesterday will be supported in 2 years. I mean really, do you think that Apple is that dumb, obviously not since you own one! And lastly, all things being equal, how much do you really think about the chip that is in your computer? As long as I hear the Apple chime and see a little grey apple appear or a happy mac icon I will be happy too. Intel, IBM, AMD, Freescale, as long as i have my shiny powerbook and Mac OS, life is good.

I don't think you'll see Centrino in a Mac, since that moniker indicates a set of technologies including processor and wi-fi chips. Unless you think Apple will drop their own wireless technology for Intel's as well?

I bought my PowerBook 12" a year and a half ago and I'll probably won't upgrade until an Intel PowerBook drops. Not because I'm hesitant about using a PPC in two years time, but rather because the there isn't a fast enough PB out there yet. The FSB is still stuck at 167MHz (the Pentium M being more than 3x faster in that regard) and battery life isn't even that great compared to the Centrino offerings. Regarding the transition I don't see why any developers would stop compiling for the PowerPC anytime soon since it will take a looooong time for everyone to replace their PPC machines.

If you could dual-boot Windows and Mac OSX that would be killer. I would go out right then and upgrade my PowerBook. Mac OSX for just about everything, boot to Windows when you need it.

What I thought was interesting is the following: "Apple -- or rather, Hollywood -- wants the Pentium D to secure an online movie store (iFlicks if you will), that will allow consumers to buy or rent new movies on demand, over the internet. According to News.com, the Intel transition will occur first in the summer with the Mac mini, which I'll bet will become a mini-Tivo-cum-home-server" I just bought a new Mac mini all decked out w/ a SuperDrive, 1.42GHz processor, Airport Extreme and Bluetooth. Anyone think I should sell it? Do you think that the current models of Macs will work with the purported "iFlix (name imagined)" service?