Skip to Content

The Hidden Message to OSx86 Trawlers

In the MacBook Pro's version of OSx86, in /System/Library/Extensions lies a little message in a kernel extension for would-be readers:

<key>_name</key>
<string>Dont Steal Mac OS X
[...]
<string>Copyright (c) 2006 Apple Computer, Inc.  All rights reserved.

<string>The purpose of this Apple software is to protect Apple copyrighted
materials from unauthorized copying and use. You may not copy, modify,
reverse engineer, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense,
transfer or redistribute this file, in whole or in part.  If you have
obtained a copy of this Apple software and do not have a valid license
from Apple Computer to use it, please immediately destroy or delete it
from your computer.

Given this message, I have a hunch that perhaps Steve has encouraged his team to implement other forms of copy protection into the production copies of OSx86, perhaps in the form of watermarking. Also, I haven't seen any mention of this in the Intel iMac's version of OSx86. Feel free to pontificate in the comments. Is this a warning that perhaps there are stronger measures coming to find users running OSx86 on non-Apple hardware?

[via OSx86 Project]

Categories

OS Rumors Hacks

In the MacBook Pro's version of OSx86, in /System/Library/Extensions lies a little message in a kernel extension for would-be...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

6 Comments

Filter by:
Davidlow

Not just to be contrary, but isn't it possible that Steve wants to ENCOURAGE hackers to port OS X to Windows??
I mean, isn't a warning like this copy protection notice, buried in a binary, just begging techno-geeks everywhere to do something about it? Steve knows this, and he also knows that the right combination of empty threats and no real security would quickly get PC users everywhere exposed to the OS X option. And without the industry (ahem, Microsoft) being able to claim it was intentional.
Dontcha think?

January 16 2006 at 1:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mayo

"Establish a linkage between a chunk of the OS code and some firmware code inside the machine such that the OS boots only if both pieces are present and unaltered."

Things like this can be always traced. firmware simulated and the check modified, or even simpler by modifying and disabling the bit that does the checking between the two.

More annoying would be if each app Apple pushes out did this, instead of the OS, so each app would have to be patched. Optionally varying this on each update of the app (software update from the apple menu i mean) so they'd have to be re-patched. Still breakable, just helluva annoying for users. But I think that's as good of a protection as you could get in this case ... make is so annoying/unusable for people who mod the OS to run on non-apple hardware so they don't actually bother, while hiding all the annoyances from normal users. (ie. don't even try to use MS's activation, I'd just give up on apple if that happened)

January 16 2006 at 12:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
hmmm

re:"What's next?"... or a 'Donate Now' button. Mac OS X as shareware! :)

It will be interesting to see how people try and get past the TPM stuff that is on the new boards. As well as how stringent Apple will be about "licensed" copies.

January 16 2006 at 10:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
billg

Establish a linkage between a chunk of the OS code and some firmware code inside the machine such that the OS boots only if both pieces are present and unaltered.

January 16 2006 at 8:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
markie

...or they decided to ask nicely, since every other type of copy-protecting their OS will be broken in a matter of time. :-) This looks like social copy-protecting... What's next? a video with Steve Jobs telling you how bad it is to steal? :-)

January 16 2006 at 6:55 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mungler

i dont see why the iMac version would be any different?

all the protections added to pre-release versions of OSX for intel have been broken. the latest ones will be too, just a matter of time.

note that i'm not specifying a preference, merely stating a fact.

January 16 2006 at 6:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.