Skip to Content

eWeek: Macs with Intel chips are still safe

A few days ago, eWeek posted a story (emphasis on "story") claiming rather speculatively that Apple's move to Intel chips "could open the door to more attacks against computers running the company's OS X operating system."

But someone at eWeek must've fallen asleep at the helm, as it seems a little common sense has found its way onto their pages: eWeek security columnist Larry Seitzer penned a piece titled "Move to Intel a Security Non-Issue for Apple," debunking the myths of the previously mentioned article. Seitzer writes rather bluntly, "Claims like these raise basic questions about what creates a vulnerability in an operating system and how attackers exploit them. The short answer is that rarely, if ever, are the existence of vulnerabilities related to the specifics of one processor architecture versus another."

Everyone I've spoken to about this issue tells me confidently that, yes, a low-level x86 "virus" could be written to affect both Windows- and Mac-based machines. But the likelihood of such an occurrence is improbable at best. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

Check out Seitzer's column for a lot of over-the-head facts and convincing reasons why the Mac will still be safe, even after the unholy switch to 'Evil Processors'.

[via MacDailyNews]

A few days ago, eWeek posted a story (emphasis on "story") claiming rather speculatively that Apple's move to Intel chips...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

2 Comments

Filter by:
AH

Oh yea, clearly without TUAW referencing an eWeek article about processor architecture the virus writers of the world would be in the dark in regards to what potential exploits could be conjured up.

TUAW is the real culprit here.
Don't reach so hard CW, you might hurt yourself.

- AH

January 31 2006 at 4:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
cweber40

The fact you keep mentioning these articles and the type of virus' that could be coded for these machines makes it more likely that it will happen now that the thought is out there. Thanks a lot for that. Dick.

January 31 2006 at 11:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.