Need a quick way to rename a file or folder in Finder? Instead of click-wait-click, just click once and hit Return (Enter). The name will highlight and be ready to edit.
Advertise with us. (Learn more)
_thumbnail.jpg "Take a stroll down memory lane")
| # | Blogger | Posts | Cmts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cory Bohon | 62 | 0 |
| 2 | Robert Palmer | 61 | 28 |
| 3 | Steven Sande | 42 | 13 |
| 4 | Mike Schramm | 32 | 7 |
| 5 | Dave Caolo | 24 | 0 |
| 6 | Michael Rose | 23 | 36 |
| 7 | Erica Sadun | 20 | 1 |
| 8 | Brett Terpstra | 16 | 0 |
| 9 | Christina Warren | 11 | 28 |
| 10 | Mat Lu | 11 | 0 |
| 11 | Victor Agreda, Jr. | 5 | 14 |
| 12 | Jason Clarke | 1 | 2 |
tuaw AppStore Iphone2.0 Mac free Apple Safari IpodTouch ItunesStore software ads development ipod game itunes breakingnews uk app-store favorite-apps Iphone3g applestore flickr tips google terminal ea FirstLook design games features mobileme SteveJobs retail podcast ipod-touch leopard rumor update lawsuit MacOsX iphone SoftwareUpdate macbook back-to-school nano quicktime Mac101 microsoft gaming talkcast
All contents copyright © 2003-2008, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
andy said 12:00PM on 5-05-2006
a good sign! have you noticed how this seems to happen a lot on the apple website, maybe they do it on purpose to start people off talking? free publicity.
Reply
Hobbes said 12:38PM on 5-05-2006
I agree. It looks more like a publicity stunt. Not bad at all I would say and it seems to work really well.
Reply
Stephan said 1:39PM on 5-05-2006
Taking a screenshot of it from a windows machine? tsk tsk tsk... :P
Good catch, everybody!
Reply
John Hood said 1:42PM on 5-05-2006
A veritable PR panacea?
Reply
CajunLuke said 4:27PM on 5-05-2006
3: that's not Windows, that's how DeerPark looks.
Reply
Mr Lizard said 7:23PM on 5-05-2006
No, that's from a Windows machine. Deer Park looked no different from Firefox, way back when it was released.
Reply
Raphael said 8:34PM on 5-05-2006
Has no-one ever found the name "MacBook" to not really fit the naming scheme?
Think: If the pro portable is named MacBook Pro and the consumer desktop iMac, then the pro desktop should logicially be named Mac Pro and the consumer portable: iMacBook.
Kinda love that name: iMacBook. Just say it a few times. Logic above all!
Reply
Reg said 9:05PM on 5-05-2006
Funnily enough, I like the name "MacBook" far more than "MacBook Pro." The latter has too many syllables and people don't know where to put the emphasis.
However, once the MacBook ne iBook is released, I think it will make a lot more sense. I think the new naming scheme will be:
Old name............New Name
iMac...................iMac
iBook.................MacBook
PowerBook.........MacBook Pro
Power Mac..........Mac Pro
Reply
Mark Thomson said 10:20AM on 5-06-2006
I think MacBook sounds about right, considering we have the Mac Mini. (what is to become of the eMac though?)
On the MacBook Pro, the name is growing on me and considering i have the 17" model on the way. I just get the feeling the next Pr desktop will just end up being called the G6 in froums and in casual conversation with my fellow geeks.
Reply
John said 8:36PM on 5-06-2006
Shouldnt they name the iMac the Macmac?
Reply
Kyle said 9:45PM on 5-07-2006
The eMac is not going to be a CRT, i read that apple has abandoned CRT because of the heavy metals in lieu of its new environmental programs.
As for naming, they want MAC in their names, which is why iMac didnt change. Why should Powermac or eMac?
Reply
Chris said 4:10PM on 5-08-2006
Based on the naming scheme, shouldn't the new PowerMac be called a ProMac? Take a hard look at #8 and do part-for-part comparisons. Seems like ProMac sounds a lot more fluid than Mac -- Pro. I really doubt they'll call the new PowerMac a MacMac.
Reply
yes said 5:28PM on 9-14-2006
YES! MAC MAC
Reply