Skip to Content

Backup not all it's cracked up to be?

I don't rely on .Mac's Backup, but I tinker with it from time to time. It's never seemed to be the killer app to fit all my needs, but others in the Mac web who are more passionate and knowledgeable about backup software seem to be quite upset with it. In particular, Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch, Michael McCracken and Erik Barzeski more or less echo the same opinion: Backup needs help, and a lot of it.

All three of these notable Mac personalities have penned horror stories and useful overviews of what is so wrong with the little .Mac app that (someday) could, and I found them with a recent Apple kbase article John Gruber linked concerning a silly restriction of working with Backup 3 files.

After reading through these, I think I might leave my Backup tinkering as just that, and rely more on ChronoSync since it does machine syncing in addition to straight backup. Though the fact that I haven't seen ChronoSync written up as good or bad in any of the recent reviews makes me curious. Has anyone heard anything?

I don't rely on .Mac's Backup, but I tinker with it from time to time. It's never seemed to be the killer app to fit all my needs, but...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

27 Comments

Filter by:
James

All of the fancy stuff for file tracking is for files on the same disk. It's not possible to to track files on other disks this way. Copy an application to a removable drive, make an alias to that application on your boot drive. Now rename the application you copied to something else. Finally try to open the application through the alias you created.

Does it work?

No it doesn't.

Alias tracking works within the same volume, who backs up files within the same volume? So the KB article makes perfect sense when you know that and save the user a crap load of problems.

October 25 2006 at 5:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
NavStar

Check out SuperDuper! It's better than CarbonCloneCopy.

And it's the ONLY Mac backup software that copies everything perfectly:

http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/

October 25 2006 at 1:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
kontorhotel

I use it all the time.. but have never had any great experiences with the actual backup itself.. kind of most a false protection...
and the .mac servers are super slow...

p.

October 25 2006 at 1:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kyle

I like the idea of .Mac, but what if you have lots of HD space available only via FTP, is there good app backup?

October 25 2006 at 12:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David Chartier

#22: Yea, they're over a year old but we're still on the same version of Backup, and the Apple kbase article I found is brand spanking new.

And yes, I actually *am* surprised that a "smart" backup program can't handle a little file juggling. Go move an application like iPhoto out of your main Apps folder and start it up. Works fine, right? Mac OS X has a lot of back-end stuff built into it *specifically* for the purposes of making mince meat out of moving files and applications around to anywhere we want. But then Backup chokes when it can't find a few disk images of backup files? They aren't even vital system files - they're just storage bins for backing files up to. It shouldn't matter in any way shape or form where users move those files, and it's a glaring error on Apple's part for botching something so simple and fundamental to the OS.

October 25 2006 at 12:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
James

You do realize that all of the blog posts you linked to are over a year old?

And is it really shocking that a "smart" automated backup program would break when you move or rename files in the external location?

October 25 2006 at 11:55 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Wysiwyg

Funny, i just changed the HD in my iBook for a bigger one, and used Backup to save my home folder in the external hard disk. The restore was flawless, with everything back at their places without a single problem. Really.

Maybe i was just lucky.

October 25 2006 at 11:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Scott

For all of you who say Backup is great, why don't you try restoring your data...then tell me how much u love it. Take it from me and many others who have been burned, it SUCKS! You have now been warned.

October 25 2006 at 10:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
nik riviera

i also use ChronoSync, and have had no problems with it (touch wood). one thing i *would* like is the ability to backup to a remote server using it though, as we live and work in the same place, and have to burn off multiple DVDs every once in a while to send offsite for fear of fire/burglary

October 25 2006 at 6:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
hessi

I own, use and like Chronosync, although its interface is a little weired and it has its inconsistencies.
I once lost an important disc image during reinstall, which in my opinion CS simply did not syncronize. I tried countless times to recreate the problem, but every time it synced fine, so maybe I really messed up during setting up the sync...

October 25 2006 at 5:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.