Filed under: Audio, Software, iTunes
Syncopation provides automatic iTunes synchronization
A recurring question we get on Ask TUAW concerns managing multiple iTunes libraries, particularly keeping them in sync, whether for one user with two computers (e.g. laptop and desktop) or between multiple users with multiple machines (e.g. family members). It was with some interest, then, that I recently ran across Syncopation from Sonzea which promises to automate the process.It will allow you either to clone a full library on two machines, or selectively sync your files (video as well as audio) via iTunes playlists or within the application itself. This could be very handy, for instance, if you want to keep an automatically updated subset of your music on your Mac portable with limited hard drive space.
Syncopation is $24.95 (for use on two Macs) and a demo is available. If you've had good experiences with Syncopation or other iTunes syncing tools, please let us know below.
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
5cents said 1:37PM on 4-09-2008
Or use Mojo and subscriptions. On a local network, you can sync unlimited iTunes libraries.
Reply
fightclub said 1:48PM on 4-09-2008
just built myself a hackintosh and this will come in QUITE handy... ill be testing this later today... woot!
Reply
unxmaal said 2:11PM on 4-09-2008
Or buy MyTuneSync ( http://www.socketheadstudios.com/mytunesync/ ), which does the same thing, includes automated scheduled backups, and costs $5 less.
Reply
Matthew Thiel said 2:57PM on 4-09-2008
According to their FAQ (http://www.socketheadstudios.com/mytunesync/faq.html#faq3), MyTuneSync requires a separate license for each machine. That means a minimum of two licenses at $20 each is actually $15 more than Syncopation.
Mike said 6:38PM on 4-09-2008
They sell a 3-pack for $29.94.
https://www.socketheadstudios.com/commerce/Product.action?buy&productId=100
Josh said 2:34PM on 4-09-2008
Also check out SuperSync: http://www.supersync.com/
And TuneRanger: http://www.acertant.com/web/tuneranger/
Might be nice to see TUAW do a comprehensive comparative review!
Reply
normterry said 2:42PM on 4-09-2008
I wish someone would make an iPhoto version
Reply
benji said 2:47PM on 4-09-2008
How about some tool that can sync between a lossless and a compressed library? ie meaning having a compressed library which is a duplicate of your master lossless library, and is used for syncing to your ipod. Anything you add to the lossless library gets synced and compressed in the other one. Nothing out there seems to do this.
Reply
TroyG said 12:18AM on 4-10-2008
Yes yes yes! I've been looking for this for a long time! I can deal with lower quality on my MacBook and iPod, but from my Mac mini HTPC w/ my speakers, I want them top quality.
I think I just need to submit this suggestion to everyone mentioned here, and buy whichever product delivers it first - ha ha.
Pat said 2:58PM on 4-09-2008
seems expensive...What happened to free software?
Reply
Roopesh Sheth said 4:20PM on 4-09-2008
Mojo is free on the LAN.
Ron said 3:15PM on 4-09-2008
I'm a very happy user of TuneRanger. I have a PC server running SqueezeCenter for my Squeezeboxes, and two Macs. Their license allows for 5 Macs or PCs to sync to each other. I sync often so that my metadata is always current across all 3 machines.
It's a very nice app. Try their demo and see. I have no affiliation to the company.
Reply
Bill said 3:20PM on 4-09-2008
How about Martian SlingShot? It works really well for playlists as well as whole libraries.
Reply
Mike said 4:19PM on 4-09-2008
I'm with Pat on this one, I gotta stop dropping money on so many software licenses. The low cost indie software market is enticingly sweet, but if you keep dropping 20 bucks a pop every time a new piece of software pops up, it adds up. Seems like it's cheaper to just throw the laptop into target disc mode and flat copy the whole folder to sync.
Reply
Julian Field said 4:04AM on 4-10-2008
And don't forget Chronosync from Econ Technology at http://www.econtechnologies.com/site/Pages/ChronoSync/chrono_overview.html which is $30 per copy. Does cross-network scheduled syncs of directory trees, with endless permutations of inclusion/exclusion rules, every feature you could want and then some.
Definitely the most fully-featured one I've ever seen.
I use it to do cross-network backups (work to home and home to work) of my music and video, and all my MailScanner documents too.
Top marks from me!
Reply
raminf said 4:48PM on 4-09-2008
I use Libra to switch iTunes libraries between the home version (on a NAS) and a smaller snapshot on the MBPro when on the road. It works fine for that usage scenario.
There's no custom synching or any of that, however. I'll have to see if any of the ones mentioned here do any better.
Reply
Seth said 4:49PM on 4-09-2008
I've played with some of these, but I've yet to find what I need: something that will help me keep my house (Seattle) library and my apartment (Los Angeles) library in sync. Do any of these work over WAN? I can get Back to my Mac to work (most of the time) but I have yet to find anything that will let me synchronize anything but .mac stuff...
Reply
Zorin said 4:50PM on 4-09-2008
To make the iTunes library on a second computer identical to that on the first:
rsync -v --rsh="ssh -x -c blowfish" --delete -a ~/Music/iTunes/. nala:./Music/iTunes/.
You can reverse the two to go in the other direction.
Sure, one library becomes a "slave" to the other, and you lose playcounts and such on the "slave" machine, but this is much better than using target mode and copying the whole damn folder. :)
Reply
normterry said 7:11PM on 4-09-2008
Rsync is sketchy at bEst and only runs when you run the command or know how to play with CRON.
--matthew said 10:15PM on 4-09-2008
I want something that will keep the files of two libraries in sync, but to have the metadata be unique. Basically, I want my soon-to-be wife and I to use separate user accounts but to have access to the same large pool of music. Ratings and playlists and stuff would be unique to each user account.
Reply