Filed under: Odds and ends, Open Source, Found Footage
F11 moves all your windows off the screen so you can quickly glance at your desktop. F10 shows you every open window in an application. F9 shows every open window for every application that isn't hidden or in the dock.
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)
| # | Blogger | Posts | Cmts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steven Sande | 52 | 4 |
| 2 | Dave Caolo | 32 | 1 |
| 3 | Mike Schramm | 32 | 0 |
| 4 | Mel Martin | 29 | 0 |
| 5 | TJ Luoma | 23 | 27 |
| 6 | Joachim Bean | 19 | 2 |
| 7 | Victor Agreda, Jr. | 16 | 7 |
| 8 | Erica Sadun | 16 | 2 |
| 9 | Michael Rose | 15 | 14 |
| 10 | Josh Carr | 13 | 22 |
| 11 | David Winograd | 12 | 17 |
| 12 | Sang Tang | 11 | 1 |
| 13 | Ken Ray | 11 | 2 |
| 14 | Brett Terpstra | 9 | 8 |
| 15 | Megan Lavey | 4 | 8 |
| 16 | Tim Wasson | 4 | 1 |
| 17 | John Burke | 4 | 3 |
| 18 | Kent Pribbernow | 4 | 0 |
| 19 | Chris Ullrich | 4 | 1 |
| 20 | Lauren Hirsch | 3 | 0 |
tablet iphone SnowLeopard keynote Bluetooth IpodNano IpodTouch jailbreak apple AppleTv AppStore itunes software AppReview OsX app-review mac ipod-touch GPS Google ATT twitter video os app-store security giveaway ipod photos Navigation features developer update HowTo imac MacbookPro iphone3gs macbook AppleStore app SoftwareUpdate MacOsX podcast hgg upgrade games iphone3g apps ItunesLp rumor
All contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
goobi said 11:25AM on 5-17-2008
Super cool! (Although ultimately not so useful in real life). I can't believe these couple of guys beat Apple to doing such a cool interface. I guess its just a preview of what's going to become of computers...
Reply
Alex said 11:29AM on 5-17-2008
Surface running on OS X? Cool
This would have practical use for businesses/stores, or at least be fun
Reply
Vlad Gorshkov said 11:50AM on 5-17-2008
Hello, MAC OS11
Reply
RobCon said 12:03PM on 5-17-2008
Anyone know the name of the music?
Reply
Zimmie said 12:22PM on 5-17-2008
As I mentioned below your comment, I'm sure that at least part of it is Celestial Annihilation by UNKLE. The biggest giveaways are the pad at 1:14, the bass line at 2:01, and the horn at 3:44. The only mix I've been able to find not on the vinyl doesn't have the record scratches, vocal samples and so forth, though, so I'd have to guess it's a mashup someone did.
Blaktornado said 12:15PM on 5-17-2008
That's awesome.
While people won't see the use, who says it needs one? It looks sweet! Awesome!
I can't wait for Apple to implement this and make all our non-touchscreen Macs redundant! :P
Reply
Zimmie said 12:17PM on 5-17-2008
Hmm. I know part of the music is Celestial Annihilation by UNKLE, but it sounds like some of it is mixed in after the fact. Maybe it's just a version I hadn't heard yet.
Very cool demo, though I wish they had shown some more of what would be possible. Yes, lots of zooming and twisting of flat images. Lots of others have shown the same thing. I suppose they just wanted to get something out to demonstrate multiple points of contact quickly, so they used some of the bog-standard stuff and only a few more interesting things.
Reply
inferno10 said 12:24PM on 5-17-2008
This implementation is similar in concept to Microsoft's surface table. I hope it doesn't get shut down...
Reply
Josh said 12:33PM on 5-17-2008
Is there really any other way to do a large, multi-touch surface at the moment? This is really the only way until projectors get good enough to do 3D multi-touch (i.e. in Paycheck and Iron Man)
YoJIMbo said 10:29AM on 5-18-2008
Do you think MS thought of that all by themselves? Multi-touch interfaces have been under development for over 20 years in the BSD/*nix community. MS just made it look "pretty" and gave it a bland name.
Hawkman said 12:24PM on 5-17-2008
One day, your computer will be a big-ass table. :)
Reply
DanH said 12:39PM on 5-17-2008
ooh, they made a nice pick on the UNKLE track for the music, thats called "Celestial Annihilation"
Reply
ZeroCorpse said 1:13PM on 5-17-2008
Wait; Now they want me to get even CLOSER to my screen? I'm already seeing a degradation in my vision from being at a recommended distance from it! Now, they want me to get less than arm's length away from a big heat and light-emitting LCD screen so I can use TWO hands to make things happen in OS X programs instead of ONE hand on a mouse.
The mouse is already causing me to reach a bit, but now I'll be expected to have my arms in the air, flailing around, ALL THE TIME just to do simple things.
This is not a step forward. It's a step back. Multi-touch makes sense on a portable device because it eliminates the need for input hardware like keyboards or cursor-controllers. But on my home system, it's a bother and a lot more work than just pointing and clicking, or using the keyboard shortcuts.
And that's not even considering the fact that I'm not keen on smudging up my screen by laying fingers on it.
Do Not Want -- At least, not in this form.
Cool as a proof of concept, but useless as a home OS interface. Make it 3D and project from a table as a hologram (ala Iron Man) and it might make sense.
Reply
Josh said 2:25PM on 5-17-2008
This has no practical consumer use but it has great potential for business and informative use. Could you imagine going into a rest stop along I-75 or somewhere and using Google Maps on something like this? I also think it has potential for use as a table in restaurants. I, personally, would love to not have to deal with a waiter at a restaurant. Being able to order what I want, when I want would be nice. Also cheaper for me. Would make sense for the business, too. No need for menus and no need to reprint menus when they want to change prices. Would also cut down on employees needed.
Barney LaHaye said 2:41PM on 5-17-2008
I agree, using your hands on a large vertical screen will not work. Your arms will get tired really fast.
What would make sense is to use the technology with a large (8" x 10") horizontal track pad and on the screen you see CGI virtual hands, you could still do it sitting on the couch looking at a wall screen 10 feet away.
I do belive the technology has a future.
We have 2 hands with 10 digets, let use them.
The mouse is just the evolution of the cursor for a word processor. It is time to move on.
Mabedan said 3:54PM on 5-17-2008
this thing sucks!!! it's just a show off thing... it reminds me the era effect in vista...
no ease of use, no functionality, almost nothing
Reply
Duscrom said 5:37PM on 5-17-2008
Jeez, Microsoft is so unoriginal. This just came out and they already stole it from Apple.
Reply
yezmu said 1:23PM on 5-18-2008
What the hell are you talking about? :/
geochick said 7:17PM on 5-17-2008
How can you say that this has no practical consumer use when we are currently using iPhones with multi-touch technology. Actually, I was playing around with a HP computer that has a touchscreen a few months back and its was very consumer practical. I wouldn't mind touching my big 22" screen to get around and launch programs now so as far as something like this just being just practical for business not a chance. That's like saying the iPhone is just practical for businesses. We are already used to multi-touch folks its just a matter of time until we start seeing more of this in our everyday computers.
Reply
Dominick Leone said 11:05PM on 5-17-2008
Graphical User Interface, GUI, is old news. Yet, sales of traditional key board & mouse interface type computers is still outstrips any other: sales of tablet PCs, touch screen systems, etc just don't match those of traditional computers.
The Newton failed in the market place, yet PC makers created some interest in palm computers and even tablet PCs. Why don't we like Tablets? Are we that addicted to the key board and mouse? The answer might lie in the lack of advance of other interfaces, not in the interest itself. Voice recognition has come a long way in 10 years, but it still lacks any reliability. Touch screen is great for navigating GUI, but entering text with an on-screen keyboard is as useful as a smoke alarm to Helen Keller. Now if you advanced both of these technologies and linked them together, you would have an interface tool worth BILLIONS.
Until then, we will be stuck with the good 'ol key board and the mouse.
Dominick Leone
Reply