<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)</title>
<link>http://www.tuaw.com</link>
<description>The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>NYC Dept. of Education suspends Mac orders pending wireless issue fix</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/18/nyc-dept-of-education-suspends-mac-orders-pending-wireless-issu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/18/nyc-dept-of-education-suspends-mac-orders-pending-wireless-issu/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/18/nyc-dept-of-education-suspends-mac-orders-pending-wireless-issu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/analysisopinion/" rel="tag">Analysis / Opinion</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/os/" rel="tag">OS</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/education/" rel="tag">Education</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/leopard/" rel="tag">Leopard</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2008/04/nyc_dept_of_education.jpg" />Apple Insider is reporting that <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/04/17/macs_suspended_from_nyc_schools_over_wifi_flaw.html">the New York City Department of Education has put all shipments of Macs</a> to schools on complete hold while they're apparently waiting for Apple to <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/12/early-10-5-2-reports-some-users-having-wireless-issues/">fix a Wifi connectivity issue</a> with OS X (which should be fixed with the 10.5.3 update). And Apple is apparently scrambling to get it worked out -- they've sent an apologetic email to faculty and have asked schools to try and separate any orders of computers that won't need wireless (that will use a regular ethernet hookup) to ship now.<br /><br />Unfortunately, there's no hint of exactly how many Macs we're talking about here, but if this is a substantial number of computers, and word gets out causing other organizations to delay shipments as well, Apple will feel more and more pressure to get the problem fixed ASAP. Bad news for the kids who want Macs in New York City (that's the DoE's seal on the right, in case you didn't recognize it), but good news for anyone else having this problem -- Apple's working hard on a fix.<br /><br /><em>Thanks, Rich!</em><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/04/17/macs_suspended_from_nyc_schools_over_wifi_flaw.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/18/nyc-dept-of-education-suspends-mac-orders-pending-wireless-issu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/1171631/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/18/nyc-dept-of-education-suspends-mac-orders-pending-wireless-issu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>10-5-2</category><category>10-5-3</category><category>apple</category><category>apple-insider</category><category>bugfixes</category><category>department-of-education</category><category>doe</category><category>issue</category><category>kids</category><category>macs</category><category>schools</category><category>wireless</category><dc:creator>Mike Schramm</dc:creator><pubDate>2008-04-18T13:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Found Footage: iPhone Stopwatch 1,000 hour "memory loss"?</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2008/03/03/found-footage-iphone-stopwatch-1-000-hour-memory-loss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2008/03/03/found-footage-iphone-stopwatch-1-000-hour-memory-loss/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2008/03/03/found-footage-iphone-stopwatch-1-000-hour-memory-loss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/ipodfamily/" rel="tag">iPod Family</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/cult-of-mac/" rel="tag">Cult of Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ke9kxb_H-ac"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ke9kxb_H-ac" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br />In this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke9kxb_H-ac">trivial video</a>, someone shows what happens to the iPhone when the stopwatch has been running for over 1,000 hours. You may ask yourself, "Who runs their iPhone's stopwatch for over 41 days?" And we asked ourselves the same thing. But what happens is most definitely surprising -- and brings a whole new meaning to geek.<br /> <br /> [via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2008/february#thu-28-stopwatch">Daring Fireball</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke9kxb_H-ac>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/03/03/found-footage-iphone-stopwatch-1-000-hour-memory-loss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/1127738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/03/03/found-footage-iphone-stopwatch-1-000-hour-memory-loss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>iPhone</category><category>iPod touch</category><category>IpodTouch</category><category>stopwatch</category><dc:creator>Cory Bohon</dc:creator><pubDate>2008-03-03T11:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>10.5.2 breaks Linotype FontExplorer X, or vice versa</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/12/10-5-2-breaks-linotype-fontexplorer-x-or-vice-versa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/12/10-5-2-breaks-linotype-fontexplorer-x-or-vice-versa/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/12/10-5-2-breaks-linotype-fontexplorer-x-or-vice-versa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/leopard/" rel="tag">Leopard</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2008/02/fontjumble.jpg" />Users of Linotype FontExplorer X may want to hold off on the 10.5.2 update ... if it's not already too late. It seems to start up fine, but once you do, clicking a stack will cause the Dock to hang; that's just one symptom, there are problems reported with several applications crashing while FontExplorer X is running. <br />
<p> </p>
<p>Suspicions are circulating that a change in font handling may be the culprit, but FontExplorer X is the common thread in most complaints. There are discussions going on at <a href="http://creativebits.org/mac_os_x/leopard_10_5_2_update_not_compatible_with_linotype_fontexplorer_x">creativebits</a>, <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6571423&amp;#6571423">Apple.com</a> and at the FontExplorer X <a href="http://www.fontexplorerx-board.com/viewtopic.php?t=749">discussion board</a>. If you're a Leopard user <em>and</em> a heavy user of FontExplorer, you'll probably want to watch those discussions to see the solution when it surfaces.</p>
<p><em>Thanks Ivan!</em></p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Seems like the problem is solved, version up. And let's have a round of applause for responsive developers while we're downloading.<em><br /></em></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.fontexplorerx-board.com/viewtopic.php?t=749>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/12/10-5-2-breaks-linotype-fontexplorer-x-or-vice-versa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/1112686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/12/10-5-2-breaks-linotype-fontexplorer-x-or-vice-versa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>10.5.2</category><category>FontExplorer</category><category>Leopard</category><category>Linotype</category><dc:creator>Brett Terpstra</dc:creator><pubDate>2008-02-12T08:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Apple: Nine ringtones is too much</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/09/apple-nine-ringtones-is-too-much/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/09/apple-nine-ringtones-is-too-much/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/09/apple-nine-ringtones-is-too-much/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/analysisopinion/" rel="tag">Analysis / Opinion</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/itunes/" rel="tag">iTunes</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/10/ringtones3.jpg" />Now this is just getting silly. Apparently there is a bug with the iPhone where if you try to automatically sync more than eight ringtones up, <a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306636">only the first eight will sync</a>. Nine, according to Apple, is too many ringtones to automatically sync up at one time. To get more than nine on, you've got to select the actual ringtones in iTunes, and set the iPhone to manually sync "selected ringtones."<br /><br />We can't see how there's any feasible reason for that-- except that somehow, in Apple's contracts with AT&amp;T or the record companies, it was specified that only eight ringtones can be synched at any one time. Loony. Either that, or this a just plain passive-aggressive swipe at <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/03/tuaw-interview-ambrosias-andrew-welch-on-the-iphone-update-and/">the folks actually trying to get ringtones past Apple</a> on the iPhone.<br /><br />At any rate, slow down on the ringtone syncing, there, buddy. Nine is way too many.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306636>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/09/apple-nine-ringtones-is-too-much/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/1008538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/09/apple-nine-ringtones-is-too-much/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>apple</category><category>bug</category><category>eight</category><category>itunes</category><category>nine</category><category>passive-aggressive</category><category>ringtones</category><category>sync</category><dc:creator>Mike Schramm</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-10-09T08:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Keynote bug: Spontaneous reboots</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/08/30/keynote-bug-spontaneous-reboots/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/08/30/keynote-bug-spontaneous-reboots/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/08/30/keynote-bug-spontaneous-reboots/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/08/keylogozz38a9f535.png" alt="" />Despite Keynote's maturity, <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1076436&amp;tstart=0">a significant bug remains</a>. Several users are reporting that pressing the "Play" button after composing a project causes the machine to immediately reboot. <br /><br />From what's been reported so far, it seems to be limited to laptops, specifically iBooks and MacBooks, with and without an external monitor attached. At this point, no fix has been found.<br /><br />Have any of you experienced this problem? Can you lend a hand in the troubleshooting?<br /><em><br />Thanks, tipster!</em><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1076436&amp;tstart=0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/08/30/keynote-bug-spontaneous-reboots/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/977498/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/08/30/keynote-bug-spontaneous-reboots/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>bugs</category><category>keynote</category><dc:creator>Dave Caolo</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-08-30T11:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>AppleHound rounds up iPhone bugs</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/24/applehound-rounds-up-iphone-bugs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/24/applehound-rounds-up-iphone-bugs/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/24/applehound-rounds-up-iphone-bugs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/troubleshooting/" rel="tag">Troubleshooting</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/07/yellowbugs.jpg" />AppleHound has posted a list of <a href="http://www.applehound.com/node/104">all the (supposedly) reproducible bugs</a> they could find in iPhone 1.0. There's 68 in total, and they range from various system hangs (the Phone app will hang if you start a sync while editing a contact photo) to many different UI/Usability bugs. Some of the usability bugs are a little iffy if you ask me-- many of them, like the "bug" where photo albums with less than 20 images don't display an actual number of images, seem to be "working as intended" (because why would you need an image count when you can easily see how many images are there?), and others have already been shot down according to <a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/OSXHIGuidelines/XHIGIntro/chapter_1_section_1.html">the Apple HIG</a>.<br /><br />But on the other hand, I can't really fault AppleHound for being such sticklers. First of all, this is a cell phone that costs $600, and you should get what you pay for-- quibbling about interface quirks now means there's a much better chance of getting them fixed in a future firmware update. And second, this is Apple we're talking about. While other cell phone companies get complaints about call reception and service outages, these are complaints about tiny, half-a-second visual inconsistencies. Heck, I love my Razr, and the screen goes nuts without reason almost daily. There's nothing wrong with holding Apple to a higher standard, and maybe if Apple is kept on their toes with the iPhone, hopefully other cell phone companies will find themselves with their feet held to the fire as well.<br /><br /><em>Thanks, Leonard Nimrod!</em><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.applehound.com/node/104>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/24/applehound-rounds-up-iphone-bugs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/947476/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/24/applehound-rounds-up-iphone-bugs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>applehound</category><category>buglist</category><category>bugs</category><category>crash</category><category>hang</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone10</category><category>system</category><category>ui</category><category>usability</category><category>workingasintended</category><dc:creator>Mike Schramm</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-07-24T10:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Submit Your iPhone Bugs to Apple</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/30/submit-your-iphone-bugs-to-apple/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/30/submit-your-iphone-bugs-to-apple/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/30/submit-your-iphone-bugs-to-apple/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bad-apple/" rel="tag">Bad Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/developer/" rel="tag">Developer</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/06/iphonebugs-1.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
There are bound to be bugs in any first generation product, and unfortunately this has been especially true for new Apple devices. It's only been a day since the iPhone went on sale, but already we're hearing of some nagging issues. But fear not, for you the user have the power to change the iPhone world for the better. If you already have an ADC account, you're all ready to start submitting bugs to the iPhone team. Head on over to <a href="https://bugreport.apple.com">bugreport.apple.com</a> and go crazy- just make sure you submit responsibly and stick to the official description format, because someone has to read through each bug you submit.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=https://bugreport.apple.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/30/submit-your-iphone-bugs-to-apple/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/930547/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/30/submit-your-iphone-bugs-to-apple/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>adc</category><category>bugreport</category><category>bugs</category><category>developer</category><category>firstgeneration</category><category>iphone</category><dc:creator>Dan Lurie</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-06-30T21:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Users report problems searching in iTunes 7.1.1</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/30/users-report-problems-searching-in-itunes-7-1-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/30/users-report-problems-searching-in-itunes-7-1-1/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/30/users-report-problems-searching-in-itunes-7-1-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/os/" rel="tag">OS</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/itunes/" rel="tag">iTunes</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/03/ituneslogothingmarch.jpg" alt="" />Jason O'Grady of ZDNet <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=477">posts</a> that thousands of Windows users are having problems with iTunes 7.1.1, which they believe will not allow them to properly search the iTunes store. Their search goes into an endless wait, and then they get a message that their iTunes request could not be completed.<br />
<p>It seems to me that Apple's response, namely that the "network connection timed-out" error is an Internet problem not a software problem, sounds reasonable. When iTunes connects to the store, it's sending out a request for what is essentially a webpage and this request can hang for any number of network reasons--including those on the Apple end.<br /><br />O'Grady suggests that users may have to uninstall iTunes 7.1.1 and re-install iTunes 7.0, but I'm not sure that is necessary. The original Apple discussion list thread is <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=903387&amp;tstart=0">here</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=477>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/30/users-report-problems-searching-in-itunes-7-1-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/863847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/30/users-report-problems-searching-in-itunes-7-1-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Bugs</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-03-30T12:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Microsoft adds iPod fixes to Vista</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/28/microsoft-adds-ipod-fixes-to-vista/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/28/microsoft-adds-ipod-fixes-to-vista/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/28/microsoft-adds-ipod-fixes-to-vista/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/ipodfamily/" rel="tag">iPod Family</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/os/" rel="tag">OS</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/03/vista.jpg" alt="" />Among several Vista patches released yesterday, Microsoft included one meant to allow iPods to disconnect without getting corrupted, CNet <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+trying+to+make+Vista+iPod+friendly/2100-1002_3-6170986.html">reports</a>. Apple has <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/16/apple-releases-itunes-7-1-1/">previously</a> addressed several iTunes/Vista compatibility issues. So do these new patches do the trick? Is it safe to eject your iPod without iTunes? TUAW suggests you err on the side of caution. As there may continue to be problems with Vista's "Safely Remove Hardware" option, Apple suggests you only use the iTunes eject function to remove your iPod.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/Microsoft+trying+to+make+Vista+iPod+friendly/2100-1002_3-6170986.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/28/microsoft-adds-ipod-fixes-to-vista/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/862196/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/28/microsoft-adds-ipod-fixes-to-vista/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Vista</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-03-28T12:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Magsafe adapters with stuck pins</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/15/magsafe-adapters-with-stuck-pins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/15/magsafe-adapters-with-stuck-pins/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/15/magsafe-adapters-with-stuck-pins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/hardware/" rel="tag">Hardware</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" border="0" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/03/stuckmagsafeconnectors.jpg" /> <p>Has your magsafe adapter stopped working properly? One of the connector pins might be stuck. Apple has published[1] a <a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303566">support article</a> on troubleshooting stuck pins. If you remove your adapter and see one or more of the pins stuck down (the two outer pins in this picture are affected), Apple suggests you try unplugging and replugging the adapter to allow the pins to reset themselves. If that doesn't work, you can use your finger or a pencil eraser to nudge the pin back into position. If all else fails? Visit your local Apple service provider.</p><p><em>[1] It's at the top of their current support RSS feed. Readers point out that it's been published before.</em></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303566>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/15/magsafe-adapters-with-stuck-pins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/853029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/15/magsafe-adapters-with-stuck-pins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>magsafe</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-03-15T14:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>iTunes 7.1: Are sorts breaking scroll-by-letter?</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/12/itunes-7-1-are-sorts-breaking-scroll-by-letter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/12/itunes-7-1-are-sorts-breaking-scroll-by-letter/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/12/itunes-7-1-are-sorts-breaking-scroll-by-letter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/ipodfamily/" rel="tag">iPod Family</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/itunes/" rel="tag">iTunes</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/03/ipodfromitunes.jpg" alt="" />TUAW reader Rae tipped us off that the new iTunes 7.1 sorting features are causing problems with the iPod's scroll-by-letter functionality. Items that start with the word "The" (like "The Breakers" or "The Danse") are sorted by their main phrase ("Breakers", "Danse") and not by "The", but when you scroll through your music, the iPod gets mixed up and the letter 'T' keeps flashing almost randomly.
<p> I sorted out my music, synced my iPod and saw exactly what Rae was talking about. When scrolling by All Artists -&gt; Albums, the following items "In Your Eyes", "The Innocent and the E Street", "Innocent Man", "The Instigator", "Invincible Summer" caused my iPod to flash "I", "T", "I", "T", "I". Very annoying!</p>
<p>Rae pointed us to a <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=4210525">couple</a> of <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=885742">discussion threads</a> over at Apple's boards about this subject.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=4210525>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/12/itunes-7-1-are-sorts-breaking-scroll-by-letter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/851092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/12/itunes-7-1-are-sorts-breaking-scroll-by-letter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>bugs</category><category>iPod</category><category>iTunes 7.1</category><category>Itunes7.1</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-03-12T16:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Reverting your iPod back to 1.2 from 1.2.1</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/12/reverting-your-ipod-back-to-1-2-from-1-2-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/12/reverting-your-ipod-back-to-1-2-from-1-2-1/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/12/reverting-your-ipod-back-to-1-2-from-1-2-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/ipodfamily/" rel="tag">iPod Family</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2007/01/itunesiconnew.jpg" />An ongoing <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=3879962#3879962">discussion</a> over at the Apple.com support forums led me to <a href="http://www.macintouch.com/readerreports/ipod/topic2401.html#dec31 ">this tip</a> from Macintouch about reverting your iPod back to firmware version 1.2. Many of the posters there have reported complaints about firmware 1.2.1 causing lockups. Paul Constantine writes that smart playlists have been killing his iPod, so he figured out how to downgrade. The secret lies in making sure only the 1.2 files are in your <tt>~/Library/iTunes/iPod Software Updates/</tt> folder and disconnecting from the Internet so you cannot download newer versions. You'll find the complete how-to <a href="http://www.macintouch.com/readerreports/ipod/topic2401.html#dec31">here</a>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macintouch.com/readerreports/ipod/topic2401.html#dec31>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/12/reverting-your-ipod-back-to-1-2-from-1-2-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/734858/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/12/reverting-your-ipod-back-to-1-2-from-1-2-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>iPod</category><category>Support</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-01-12T15:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Microsoft releases Office 2004 11.3.3  and Office v. X for Mac 10.1.9 updates</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/10/microsoft-releases-office-2004-11-3-3-and-office-v-x-for-mac-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/10/microsoft-releases-office-2004-11-3-3-and-office-v-x-for-mac-1/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/10/microsoft-releases-office-2004-11-3-3-and-office-v-x-for-mac-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/software-update/" rel="tag">Software Update</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/security/" rel="tag">Security</a></p><img width="125" vspace="8" hspace="8" height="132" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/12/msautoup.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/09/office-2008-for-mac-in-second-half-of-2007/">Office 2008 for Mac </a>(or Office 12, if you prefer) may still be months away, but the Microsoft Mac BU team is still working to improve <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/tag/office2004">Office 2004</a> and Office v.X while we wait.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mac/autoupdate/description/AUOffice20041133EN.htm">Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac 11.3.3 Update</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mac/downloads.aspx?pid=download&amp;location=/mac/download/OFFICEX/OfficeX_1019.xml">Microsoft Office v. X for Mac 10.1.9 Update</a> include a variety of security and stability fixes, including a fix for the annoying DST bug in Entourage 2004 that caused calendar events scheduled on or after March 11, 2007 to be an hour off, thanks to <a href="http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/daylight_time.html">the decision to change the start and end of Daylight Time</a> (aka Standard Time) in the US.<br /><br />The specific fixes in these updates are:<br />
<ul>
    <li><em>Improvements for all Office 2004 &amp; <span class="normal">Office v. X </span></em><em>applications - fixes vulnerabilities in that an attacker can use to overwrite the contents of your computer's memory with malicious code. <br /></em></li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><em>Improvements for Word 2004 - improves compatibility with recent changes to the way Rich Text Format (RTF) documents are created by Microsoft Office Word 2003 for Windows.</em></li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><em>Improvements for Excel 2004 - fixes an issue that causes standard deviation calculations to produce inaccurate results when the calculations are used in PivotTable reports.</em></li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><em>Improvements for Entourage 2004 - fixes an issue for users of Mac OS X 10.4.5 or later that causes any calendar event scheduled on or after March 11, 2007 to display on a time slot that is one hour ahead of its original start time. This issue affects all meetings that occur on or after March 11, 2007, including recurring meetings. The Japanese postal code dictionary has also been updated with the latest information as of June 2006.</em></li>
</ul>
Grab them from Microsoft AutoUpdate or from the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mac/downloads.aspx">downloads page</a>. I just installed the 2004 update and nothing is broken yet, so hopefully you'll be just as lucky.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.microsoft.com/mac/downloads.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/10/microsoft-releases-office-2004-11-3-3-and-office-v-x-for-mac-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/733341/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/10/microsoft-releases-office-2004-11-3-3-and-office-v-x-for-mac-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft office</category><category>MicrosoftOffice</category><category>office 2004</category><category>office mac</category><category>Office2004</category><category>OfficeMac</category><dc:creator>Laurie A. Duncan</dc:creator><pubDate>2007-01-10T13:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Battle of the (battery) bulge</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/25/battle-of-the-battery-bulge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/25/battle-of-the-battery-bulge/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/25/battle-of-the-battery-bulge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/portables/" rel="tag">Portables</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/troubleshooting/" rel="tag">Troubleshooting</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/macbook-pro/" rel="tag">Macbook Pro</a></p><div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/12/bulgybattery.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>TUAW reader Evan Hindra went to sleep one night with his <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/macbook/">MacBook Pro</a> playing music. The next morning, it wouldn't sit properly on the kitchen counter top. When he flipped over the laptop, he found that his battery had begun to bulge. He called up AppleCare and they're sending him a battery. (He continues to wonder whether the battery problems date back before the bulge to a series of unexpected shut downs.) On the bright side, his MacBook Pro didn't explode, burst into flames or start playing random Barry Manilow tracks, all of which could cause permanent and irreversible harm. If your MacBook Pro starts displaying odd symptoms, you might want to take a good look at your battery and make sure it's not going all Alien on you, as in the original version with the icky chest bursting scene.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.apple.com/macbook/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/25/battle-of-the-battery-bulge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/724480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/25/battle-of-the-battery-bulge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Battery</category><category>Bulge</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2006-12-25T18:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>TextEdit data loss concerns</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/textedit-data-loss-concerns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/textedit-data-loss-concerns/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/textedit-data-loss-concerns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/12/screen_textedit.gif" alt="" />Over at MacOSXHints, Rob G. has posted a must-read <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2006121111234963">article</a> about possible data loss from TextEdit's Save dialog. The problem stems from TextEdit's (and Cocoa's) willingness to overwrite entire folders with text files.
<p>This data security hole seems to occur because "bundle" style files (which are actually folders and not single files) are considered on-par with flat files in OS X. TextEdit does not seem to check to ensure that the folder being replaced is actually a bundle and not, say, your entire home directory. It's an important article to read and a bug that you need to be aware of.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2006121111234963>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/textedit-data-loss-concerns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/722092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/textedit-data-loss-concerns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Data loss</category><category>DataLoss</category><category>MacOSXHints</category><category>TextEdit</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2006-12-20T13:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>January 2007 to be the month of Apple Bugs</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/january-2007-to-be-the-month-of-apple-bugs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/january-2007-to-be-the-month-of-apple-bugs/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/january-2007-to-be-the-month-of-apple-bugs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/security/" rel="tag">Security</a></p><img vspace="8" hspace="8" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/07/secure.jpg" alt="" />January 2007 is the month picked by a pair of security researchers to feature a day-by-day bug-by-bug listing of Apple security holes. Due to start on New Years day, the two plan to post the bugs without giving advanced warning to Apple. A Washington Post <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/12/january_2007_month_of_apple_bu.html">article</a> states "[W]hile [the]upcoming project had the potential to at least temporarily make security more tenuous for the average Mac user, [the researcher] believes that in the long run the project will improve OS X security." This explanation sounds like the project is more about getting page hits and less about making OS X secure.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/12/january_2007_month_of_apple_bu.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/january-2007-to-be-the-month-of-apple-bugs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/721995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/20/january-2007-to-be-the-month-of-apple-bugs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Apple Bugs</category><category>AppleBugs</category><category>January 2007</category><category>January2007</category><category>Security</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2006-12-20T11:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>TUAW Mythbusting: Core 2 Duo with 3GB RAM slower than with 2GB?</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/15/tuaw-mythbusting-core-2-duo-with-3gb-ram-slower-than-with-2gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/15/tuaw-mythbusting-core-2-duo-with-3gb-ram-slower-than-with-2gb/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/15/tuaw-mythbusting-core-2-duo-with-3gb-ram-slower-than-with-2gb/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/09/rammemorychip.jpg" alt="" />Does a 3GB RAM configuration break the Core 2 Duo's dual channel requirements? Does it lower performance below what you'd get with 2GB RAM? Blogger Dino over at ip0d.com has been <a href="http://ip0d.com/index.php?entry=entry061114-113121">on the case</a> but hasn't gotten any clear answers one way or the other. <br /><br />So TUAW is tossing this one out to you myth-busting readers. What's the deal here? Is this fact or fiction? Will a 3GB system run slower or not?<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://ip0d.com/index.php?entry=entry061114-113121>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/15/tuaw-mythbusting-core-2-duo-with-3gb-ram-slower-than-with-2gb/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/702144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/15/tuaw-mythbusting-core-2-duo-with-3gb-ram-slower-than-with-2gb/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>core duo</category><category>CoreDuo</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2006-11-15T08:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>The Latest Bugs: iPod Nano On-the-Go problems</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/the-latest-bugs-ipod-nano-on-the-go-problems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/the-latest-bugs-ipod-nano-on-the-go-problems/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/the-latest-bugs-ipod-nano-on-the-go-problems/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/ipodfamily/" rel="tag">iPod Family</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/11/computer-bug.gif" id="vimage_1" alt="" />TUAW reader <em>Frix</em> <a href="http://www.macworld.com/forums/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&amp;Number=458378&amp;page=0&amp;vc=1#Post458378">reports</a> that some 8-Gigabyte 2nd gen iPod nanos are manifesting a bug with their "On-the-Go" playlists. Users cannot include artists, albums or genres in these lists. The latest firmware (1.1.1) and iTunes release don't seem to fix the problem. Some 2-Gigabyte 2nd gen owners are reporting the same problem. <br /><br />Got a fix or an insight? Let us know.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macworld.com/forums/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&amp;Number=458378&amp;page=0&amp;vc=1#Post458378>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/the-latest-bugs-ipod-nano-on-the-go-problems/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/701901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/the-latest-bugs-ipod-nano-on-the-go-problems/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Bugs</category><category>Bzzzt</category><category>iPod</category><dc:creator>Erica Sadun</dc:creator><pubDate>2006-11-14T18:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Apple Firmware Restoration CD 1.2</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/apple-firmware-restoration-cd-1-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/apple-firmware-restoration-cd-1-2/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/apple-firmware-restoration-cd-1-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/imac/" rel="tag">iMac</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/troubleshooting/" rel="tag">Troubleshooting</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/mac-mini/" rel="tag">Mac mini</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/macbook-pro/" rel="tag">Macbook Pro</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/macbook/" rel="tag">MacBook</a></p><img width="225" vspace="0" hspace="0" height="225" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/11/osx-burn-icon.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />The <a href="http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/firmwarerestorationcd12.html">Apple Firmware Restoration CD 1.2</a> will restore your Intel-based Intel-based Mac to original factory condition. It can only be used to restore the Firmware after an interrupted or failed update.<br /><br />If your computer is already bricked, you'll need to download the update and create the CD on another Mac computer (PowerPC or Intel), or take your Mac to your local Apple Store or Apple Authorized Service Provider and they'll do it for you.<br /><br />If any of you had a problem with <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/13/apple-releases-efi-firmware-updates-for-intel-macs/">yesterday's firmware update</a>, you might want to try this restore CD before you panic. Let us know how it goes!<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/firmwarerestorationcd12.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/apple-firmware-restoration-cd-1-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/701679/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/14/apple-firmware-restoration-cd-1-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>efi</category><category>efi firmware</category><category>EfiFirmware</category><category>imac</category><category>intel mac</category><category>IntelMac</category><category>macbook</category><category>macbook pro</category><category>MacbookPro</category><dc:creator>Laurie A. Duncan</dc:creator><pubDate>2006-11-14T13:30:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Apple settles 17-inch Studio Display class action</title><link>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/13/apple-settles-17-inch-studio-display-class-action/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/13/apple-settles-17-inch-studio-display-class-action/</guid><comments>http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/13/apple-settles-17-inch-studio-display-class-action/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bugs-recalls/" rel="tag">Bugs/Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/bad-apple/" rel="tag">Bad Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><img width="225" vspace="5" hspace="5" height="228" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/11/apple_17display.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Apple has agreed to a settlement in the <a href="http://www.apple17inchlcddisplay.com/index.html">Class Action Suit</a> regarding allegedly defective inverter boards that caused problems with 17-inch Studio Displays. Although Apple won't admit any wrongdoing (as is usually the case in these kinds of settlements), it has agreed to settle the claim in order to avoid the exorbitant expense of a trial. The lawsuit claimed that "<em>the inverter board of the Apple 17-inch LCD Studio Display was faulty, causing the gradient dimming of the top or bottom half of the screen of the Display and a power light to constantly blink on and off in a short-short-long pattern to signal a problem.</em>"<br /><br /> Under the terms of the agreement, Apple will provide cash refunds ranging from $75 - $400 to claimants who had their affected displays repaired. The amount refunded will depend on when the repair was performed and whether it was an Apple repair or a repair by a a third party. Only US residents are eligible for the settlement. Additional details, claim forms and a FAQ are <a href="http://www.apple17inchlcddisplay.com/faq.html">available on the suit info site</a>.<br /><br />How many of you are covered by this settlement and plan to submit a claim?<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.apple17inchlcddisplay.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/13/apple-settles-17-inch-studio-display-class-action/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/forward/700904/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/11/13/apple-settles-17-inch-studio-display-class-action/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>apple studio display</category><category>AppleStudioDisplay</category><category>class action</category><category>ClassAction</category><dc:creator>Laurie A. Duncan</dc:creator><pubDate>2006-11-13T11:00:00+00:00</pubDate></item></channel></rss>