Skip to Content

Tiger: have you upgraded?

Tiger BoxAs I was walking through the bookstore the other day (yes, I still use paper), I noticed that there were a lot of Tiger books on the shelves. This surprised me for two reasons: 1) The Mac shelves of this particular store are usually pretty poorly stocked, and 2) The public release really wasn't that long ago. In my mind, at least, Tiger is still new, and it doesn't seem like there should be much of a market for so many competing texts yet. I mean, really, how many "average" users run out and upgrade as soon as a new OS ships? I know people who are still running Jaguar.

Then I got to thinking, "maybe it's just me," so I thought I'd do a little unscientific analysis and ask you all:

What version of OS X are you using?
I like shiny things: Tiger.
Panther rocks! (besides, I'm poor).
I've always wanted a Jaguar, and now that I have it, I don't want to give it up (besides, I've been poor for a long time).
10.1: my beige G3 doesn't like where Quartz has headed.
10.0: the CD-ROM on my beige G3 is bronken.
9.2: because it's a "classic"
Darwin
Something else
  

Will you upgrade to Tiger?
  
 

As I was walking through the bookstore the other day (yes, I still use paper), I noticed that there were a lot of Tiger books on the...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

14 Comments

Filter by:
bertram

my mac at work was running 9.2. that was replaced with a mac running tiger. i have panther at home. all things being equal, i prefer panther.

July 15 2005 at 12:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Lawrence

Shouldn't the question be: "What Mac OS are you using?" Since 9.2 is NOT Mac OS X. Neither is Other. BTW I am running Tiger at work and at home. L

July 15 2005 at 8:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jasmeet

*Panther rocks! (besides, I'm poor). *I've always wanted a Jaguar, and now that I have it, I don't want to give it up (besides, I've been poor for a long time). Maybe I fail to get the humor is this, but it just seems like it's in 'poor' taste. I have Tiger running on my iMac and several machines (demos) a work, and it just doesn't run as stable and fast as Panther on my iBook. I didn't upgrade because I was poor. I didn't upgrade because Tiger does not satisfy my needs. Poor has nothing to do with it. Seriously, what was wrong with just putting * 10.3 Panther * 10.2 Jaguar No smart-aleck comments, just plain and simple?

July 15 2005 at 2:48 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
creanium

You left out an option: Panther: because my mission-critical apps (like VPN software) aren't Tiger-compatible yet.

July 15 2005 at 2:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
CB

I am on Tiger after installing it the day it came in the mail. Still, I am going back. The added overhead of Tiger features leaves my 1.25GHz Powerbook feeling like more my enemy and less my friend. I am a grad student who processes MRI scans with my 'book at home, and Tiger has increased my processing times significantly. YMMV - IANAEngineer...

July 14 2005 at 7:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Guilhas

I'm bit confused with the poll results, I'm still with Phanter. There's some part of me that really wants to try Tiger, however I really apreciate bug free OS's, makes me feel safe. To be honest I'm 100% satisfied with Phanter and I really need a good reason, of course apart spotlight, to make the upgrade. Maybe I've missed something, but, does the daily software applications all of you usually use run faster with Tiger? My point is, if you work in an office environment with a mac why spend money on Tiger? I understand that devoted guys like us really want to be up to date with apple inovations, but I can say that it was much easier for me to decide buying Ilife 05 than choosing Tiger from day one.

July 14 2005 at 7:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
paul

I'm still on Panther because Tiger is buggy, as I expected. Once they fix the problems (if ever), I'll upgrade. Especially the problem with Spotlight trying to automatically index external hard drives. I shouldn't have to hack my own computer for basic things.

July 14 2005 at 6:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
matt

seems to me that asking a bunch of people who follow a blog devoted to all things mac is hardly getting a sample of "average" users.

July 14 2005 at 5:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
daggerquill

Hope this works better for people now. After some wrangling with out poll host, I think one of each is the best option.

July 14 2005 at 5:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jake

tiger is disappointing. frankly, i'm only using tiger because it came with my powerbook; it's buggy, and i don't see the so-called "200 new features", dashboard is trivial and i don't use it, spotlight is ok though, automator is useless. the finder needs an overall, of all things they could've changed, and it feels like it hasn't been worked on at all. lots of annoying bugs that make me wish i was still on panther.

July 14 2005 at 5:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.