Skip to Content

Intel Mac minis great little HD machines


That's what Ben Drawbaugh over at HD Beat says, and he should know since he eats, lives, and breaths in HD (I think in much lower resolutions myself). Head on over to HD Beat to get the nitty gritty details, but it seems that support for HD resolutions is now built into OS X (before it requires some extra software) and that's pretty sweet.

Does this mean we'll see higher res stuff from the iTunes Music Store? I certainly hope so.

That's what Ben Drawbaugh over at HD Beat says, and he should know since he eats, lives, and breaths in HD (I think in much lower...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

8 Comments

Filter by:
Bob Mc

According to Apple's own system requirements, the Mac Mini doesn't have the juice to power HD:

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/guide/hd/recommendations.html

March 01 2006 at 1:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Marc

I like the typo in the pic above that shows "000 Ethernet." That's pretty fast!

March 01 2006 at 10:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Patrick Mast

Is there a Universal Binary for the MythTV frontend? if so, THIS is my machine! ;-))

March 01 2006 at 5:53 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ooda

I will be buying the new Mac Mini, not just because of the speed, but the remote is a huge factor. Currently I've got the (now old) Mac Mini in my bedroom, and a Pioneer home theatre system I got for Christmas hooked up to it. I was waiting for the Firewave (I think that's what it's called) to come out, but it's probably best to hook up the home theatre system to a tv, and just have the new Mac Mini/iPod Hi-Fi combo in my room. Seems like something good for the bedroom, and the digital out is a nice plus.

Though I do have to say that I am feeling underwhelmed after this special event.

February 28 2006 at 6:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
JD

I was waiting on this box to add to my HD system -- my fairly modest goals for the Intel mini was:

MythTV frontend -- CHECK
Web browsing -- CHECK
Frontrow/iTunes frontend -- CHECK
Box for bigscreen WoW, UT2004, etc. -- NOT!!

So while the GMA950 video chip might excel at HD -- the total lack of usable 3D performance (see: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0%2C1558%2C1821803%2C00.asp) has me completely turned off to this box. I'll probably wait for the Intel "Powermacs" and then switch my current G4 mini into the role.

What a disappointment.... -JD

February 28 2006 at 4:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ed

#2 -- For what it's worth, (and it's not a direct comparison, since I'm using Windows) my Sony Core Duo 1.83 GHz laptop uses about 50-60% of the 2 cores to decode and play 1080p quicktime videos. I'd say the 1.5 core solo may not be enough, but maybe quicktime for OS X is more optimized than for windows... I've already ordered a 1.66 Core Duo mini for my HDTV :)

February 28 2006 at 4:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
arkowi

Well, since I have posted about HDTV in all the other Mac Mini posts today I might was well stick my nose in this one.

This is what I was waiting for from a Mac Mini - HDTV playback power. I will wait for some reports to see if I can get by with the cheaper version however.

February 28 2006 at 3:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
the1bigboy

I've very happy went with the standard audio in jack, having to go out and buy a 20 mic for USB is a pain in the arse. Also happy to see four USB2.0 ports.
Nice job apple.
For a change I'm not crying over the 'next big thing I wont have' cause... the next big thing uses a green LED light...
eww.

February 28 2006 at 3:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.