Skip to Content

Bluetooth iPod functionality days away

Damien pointed out the new Nike/Apple joint venture that was announced today, and mentioned that it seems to lend credence to the notion of an Apple-branded bluetooth* device for the iPod. After poking around the site a bit, I'd say that it's a lock see the update below.

Click "Overview" and watch the video. The actor plugs a "receiver" into the bottom of his iPod which, according to the site, "talks" to a transponder in the sneakers. As you run, software on the iPod relays information on your journey gathered by the transponder to your headphones, like total distance traveled, average pace, etc. You'll notice there's no cable traveling from the sneaks to the 'Pod (you can see a larger version of this snapshot plus another after the jump). In fact, this page contains the following quote:

"The receiver fits securely into the Dock connector on the bottom of your iPod nano. Wirelessly connected to the sensor in your Nike+ shoe, it receives up-to-the-second information as you run."

Now, it looks like it's the receiver that adds wireless functionality to the iPod, and not something built into the player itself (which makes sense, because who would want to buy a brand new nano just for this?). So, this setup will most likely only perform this single task wirelessly (note that the actor still uses wired headphones with the iPod). But once that receiver is in place, manufacturers (including Apple, of course) should be able to easily create accessories for it. Still, it's pretty cool. According to Nike, the kit will available in 60 days, but you can pre-order now.

*Update: Could be a false alarm on the bluetooth, folks. Further inspection has revealed that the sneaker transponder uses a 2.4 Ghz, proprietary
signal to transfer information to the iPod. Drat. Plus, "proprietary" sounds like "3rd party manufacturers won't be making headphones any time soon." Oh, well.





Categories

iPod Family Rumors

Damien pointed out the new Nike/Apple joint venture that was announced today, and mentioned that it seems to lend credence to the notion of...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

27 Comments

Filter by:
Adam

Why just for the nano? How about size, and the fact there are NO moving parts in the Nano! Running or jogging with a hard disk based iPod would not be good in the long run, pardon the pun. Also, the sleek design of the Nano lends itself to using a nice waterproof arm band.

May 24 2006 at 2:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jonathan Poh

Any reason why this wouldn't work with the full sized ipods? The nanos are probably popular with the sporting crowd because of its size and shock-proof Flash memory.

Guess we'll be seeing a firmware update soon to add the new features, along with iTunes 6.0.5

May 24 2006 at 12:19 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Peter Kirn

NOT using Bluetooth is very good indeed. Sound quality on BT is still inferior to cheap headphones and a cable, at about 10x the price.

May 23 2006 at 11:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Peter Zimowski

Actually, I think the laptop at the end of the infomercial is a white MacBook - noticed the iSight at the top of the display.

May 23 2006 at 10:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Askar

I think that's Macbook, it's slim

May 23 2006 at 8:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
matt

anyone else notice that the guy in the little infomercial is using what i think is an ibook?

May 23 2006 at 7:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Timmay

That adaptor looks like the one for the iMuffs (still the worst name ever for an iPod accessory...)

Timmay

May 23 2006 at 7:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Erik

Do you guys think that it uses www.birdstep.com 2.4 Ghz sensors. Their products if well known for long battery life (Some Logitech mice has a battery life over 1 year)

May 23 2006 at 4:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tpen

What about the already existing (ugly but great-sounding) Bluetooth headphones out there from TEN?

http://www.tentechnology.com/products/products_headset.php

May 23 2006 at 4:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nathan

The sensor is expected to late approx 1200 hours. See the Niketown site http://niketown.nike.com/niketown/catalog/collection_pdp.jsp?productId=118701&categoryId=307903#

"Automatically turns on and off, providing approximately 1200 hours of operation."

May 23 2006 at 4:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.