Skip to Content

Parallels Desktop Release Candidate 2, uh, released


Get your mice clicking ladies and gentlemen, as Parallels has offered up the final test version of Parallels Desktop for Mac, their virtualization software that allows you to run almost any OS right within Mac OS X. With this version, however, Parallels has increased the app's final price to $79.99, as they have incorporated their Compressor Server tool (due to user feedback) into the software package for streamlining and optimizing your virtual machines and the amount of disk space they occupy. The beta testing pre-order price of $39.99 is still in place, and probably more appetizing than ever. Other new features and improvements in the Release Candidate 2 include:
  • Significantly improved performance
  • Improved USB performance and broader device support
  • Improved Host-guest networking
  • Automatic network adapters now switch on-the-fly
  • Guest OS no longer steals host IP address in some DHCP servers
  • Fullscreen mode is now customizable
  • Integration with Virtue is now bug-free
  • Customizable Ctrl + Click mapping
  • Guest 32bit color is supported when Parallels Tools is installed
  • Improved Shared folders performance
  • Resolved shared folders/MS Office incompatibility issues
  • Windows 98 no longer consumes 99% host CPU even when idle (in VT-x mode)
Also note that if you download this newest release, you must re-install the Parallels Tools for guest Windows installations (NT/2000/XP/2003). As with previous beta releases, this download is free before the software package goes official.

Categories

OS Software

Get your mice clicking ladies and gentlemen, as Parallels has offered up the final test version of Parallels Desktop for Mac, their...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

25 Comments

Filter by:
M.A. Hollander

Is anyone using Quicken Deluxe (for Windows) using Parallels Desktop for Mac? Are there any major problems, especially downloading investment data? Quicken for Mac is terrible and I am hoping that Parallels will enable me to use the Windows version so that my account data is accurate!

July 24 2006 at 2:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bill T

I don't think there is much lag at all when working in XP and OS X. Windows runs at about 95% of native speed, which is plenty for me.

June 06 2006 at 8:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jonathan

Wow. This sounds awesome. I have a Thinkpad right now and am looking at the MBP. I need to have access to certain Windows apps. For reference to the poster inquiring about why anyone needed Windows apps beyond Adobe, let me provide some input.

For background, I am an attorney and I used to do NLE and documentary work. I'd love to have an Apple for the NLE and general computer operation, but I have to be able to run certain applications for my legal practice. For example, Trial Director (indatacorp.com) is not available on the Mac. Another, essential program, is Time Matters (timematters.com). While you can access it virtually through the Web Server edition, the cost is significant, and I'd rather have a virtual session. Live note and other trial realted programs are a must.

The whole idea of being able to work in both worlds without issues and no substantive lag is very appealing. FWIW, I don't care much about gaming, so I'm looking at practical office related operations. This makes chosing a mac for my replacement notebook in July a no brainer.

Jonathan

June 03 2006 at 11:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dom

This version flies along, even on my lowly 17" iMac with 512Mb RAM. The previous RC just crawled.

Now, my clean XP install boots in 10 seconds. Which, oddly, is faster than a similar install on Boot Camp.

June 02 2006 at 8:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bill T

The way you copy and paste in Parallels is by dragging the files from say, Windows, into a "shared folder," and the file will simultaneously appear on your OS X desktop. Extremely simple.

June 02 2006 at 7:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thayne Miller

I use windows for engineering applications that are not written for mac. Yes, there is a world of uses for this outside of gaming. Also, quicktime can't edit mpeg2 video files, so that's another reason I need to have windows around. Yes, I could buy Final Cut Pro, but for just a quick & dirty cut and splice, there are free software apps that work quite well in windows. Again, quicktime pro can read mpeg2 video files if you have the apple codec, but it can not edit them. If anyone can show me an alternative to either of these two uses, feel free (and don't someone say mpeg streamclip because I'm not trying to re-encode, I'm just simply trying to edit an mpeg2).

June 01 2006 at 4:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
XIII

I hope they found some sort of solution for the VT-x recognition problem, because it absolutely crawls on my Mini.

June 01 2006 at 3:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jan Peters

Can I copy and paste between windows and Mac OS X? I can do that between Virtual PC on my G4 and Mac OS X. Even with pictures!

June 01 2006 at 2:10 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mike

"other than possibly playing a game that's made for Windows"

which you would NEVER use Parallels for.. you would just use Boot Camp

May 31 2006 at 10:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David Chartier

There's a ton of software out there, outside the Adobe universe, that is Windows-only. Medical, business, real estate, law... the list is endless. As much as we all love Mac OS X, it's still in the single-digit market usage. Most of the planet is using Windows, and a lot of those people are (whether by choice, against their will or otherwise) using Windows-only software.

May 31 2006 at 10:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.