Skip to Content

Mac Geekery debunks Dashboard 'phoning home'

JC (yes, the Ungenius guy) at Mac Geekery has used some UNIX tricks to do some digging into the whole 'Dashboard phoning home' topic that's been heating up the Mac web lately. After all is said and done and JC lays out exactly what is happening, he concludes that not only is Mac OS X 10.4.7 not sending any personal data (which we've already been told), but you actually give Apple more data about yourself simply by visiting Apple.com. Here's hoping those worried about Apple trampling their privacy can sleep a little better at night.

Categories

OS Software Internet Security

JC (yes, the Ungenius guy) at Mac Geekery has used some UNIX tricks to do some digging into the whole 'Dashboard phoning home' topic that's...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

14 Comments

Filter by:
derek

Ok, this is fucking pissing me off...
WHO GIVES A FUCK?!?!?! Apple is checking up on the widgets, omg, we are at risk!!! What the hell is wrong with you? Get a life.

July 12 2006 at 2:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sjk

Re: But honestly, who really cares.

Do a bit of research and you might understand why some people have perfectly valid, level-headed reasons to be concerned with content to/from computers and over networks they have responsibilities for managing.

July 11 2006 at 2:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chase

I think that this whole thing has been blown completely out of proportion. Sure Dashboard does 'call home' to Apple every once and a while. But honestly, who really cares. The little process is really doing nothing more than checking for software updates on Apple's servers. This is nowhere near as sinister as Microsoft's Windows Genuine Advantage which has the ability to brick your entire computer should Billy G get a little ticked at you.

July 11 2006 at 1:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Akshat

Sure, they ran a tcpdump to www.apple.com. What if the application is talking to another host?

July 11 2006 at 1:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
matthew

Ian hit the nail on the head.

Giving the user the option to check for updates, manually or automatically, is a best practice Apple uses across the board. Why not Widgets?

I don't think this is a betrayal of the community, but it is an unnecessary misstep by a company that generally does the right thing.

July 11 2006 at 1:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Peter van Impelen

DTDAD
(Disable the dashboard advisory daemon)
Disable or enable the dashboardadvisoryd on Mac OS 10.4.7.

free download :

http://bigpixel.macintoshdevelopers.net/software/info/dtdad.html

July 11 2006 at 1:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Derek

I just love the stuff on Mac Geekery. Those guys are awesome.

July 11 2006 at 1:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bob Mc

Ben, how, exactly is it "unequivocally bad"?

Why do you guys care? I've never seen any argument as to why this is bad.

July 11 2006 at 12:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ken R

yeah, maybe it ask the user whenever a widget changes (is installed or updated) whether or not they want to check...

July 11 2006 at 12:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Al

Ian: You've just lowered my opinion of MacUser. SHOCK HORROR, Apple messed up by not documenting something?

Christ, it really is a slow news week.

Ben, how, exactly is it "unequivocally bad"?

Guess what - you install OS X 10.4.7 voluntarily. There's no warning before you go to apple.com telling you they'll know your IP, OS, Browser etc.

Load of hype about nothing. If there's nothing decent to report on, don't turn the tiniest things into major stories.

July 11 2006 at 12:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.