OS X browser test, fourth edition

After reading this article, I'm simply giddy with self-righteous indignation for all the people who have ever told me I was silly for paying money for a browser. The guys over at macintalk have revived their popular Macintosh browser shootout and re-tested all of the competitors using the latest universal binaries of Firefox, Camino, Safari, WebKit, and the OmniWeb 5.5 beta.
As many of you might expect, Firefox, the PC favorite, lagged behind all other browsers tested in the speed tests, with its sleek sibling Camino not scoring much better. The two gecko browsers also failed to render the Acid2 test properly, while OmniWeb and Safari/WebKit passed with flying colors.
Now, I don't want anyone to get the idea that I'm bashing Firefox and Camino. Camino will always have a place in my dock to handle all of the sites that WebKit can't, but I much prefer OmniWeb for my day-to-day usage, and the test results seem to agree with me.
[Via Creativebits]
Share
Categories
After reading this article, I'm simply giddy with self-righteous indignation for all the people who have ever told me I was silly for...
Add a Comment
Omni just posted on your own blog about this (http://blog.omnigroup.com), and apparently they're also puzzled by it being faster than the other webkit browsers (looks like they didn't even know it was faster before your post...) They suspect it might have something to do with garbage collection (the way they manage memory usage if you don't know the term).
As for those complaining about Opera not being mentioned... IE wasn't mentioned either. This is about *popular* browsers, Opera is so rare on mac systems the author probably decided it doesn't deserve mentioning. Either way, I doubt Opera performs well under Mac OS X compared to OmniWeb or even Safari, as far as I know it's always been one of the slower browsers on the mac platform (just like firefox, which is extremely fast under windows and linux).
If Opera followed a few more of the Mac OS X UI guidelines (even FireFox does a half decent job), it would be on the list.
Re: Re: #13. Not cool posting that info publicly
Anyone who's a member of the omnigroup forums has access to the sneaky peeks, and a quick google search will show omniweb's own website instructs people to join up if they wanna use it. I don't think they mind much.
10. Ran the Acid2 test here...
Passed: Shiira, Opera, Safari, WebKit
Failed: OmniWeb, Firefox (2.0 b1rc3), Camino
WRONG!
omniweb passes, what kinda drugs are you on?
Omniweb is still using your monitor profile as the default for viewing images, instead of sRGB. sRGB is recommended by w3c and is what most digital cameras use. I'm not buying until they fix this.
July 14 2006 at 11:53 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyOk.. wow.. I thought I was losing my mind... I fired up this 'brilliant speedy browser' and got the longest loading times I had ever seen for a web browser application. Once it actually launched, page rendering time was AWFUL.
I might have missed this in the article, but Intel Mac folks - you need the BETA (5.5) available here:
http://www.omnigroup.com/ftp/pub/software/MacOSX/.sneakypeek/
The file is password protected and that password is available in the Omni Forums to any registered user (free signup):
http://forums.omnigroup.com/showthread.php?t=527
I don't care if Omni Web is fast. I just wish 3 weeks could go by without it crashing. We don't sparkly cursors. We need Rock Steady browsers. I used this product when it was a NeXT app and have to say its got more bells & whistles but it's not as reliable as it used to be!
July 13 2006 at 7:42 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replywhat about FLOCK??????????????????????????
July 12 2006 at 9:52 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply19. Re: #13. Not cool posting that info publicly.
Quit your whining. All you have to do to get the .dmg password is sign up for the OmniWeb forums (free, one click in your email like any other). Once you do that, the password is right there in plain view for anyone who wants it. So I imagine they aren't tooo worked up about it being posted on TUAW.
Firefox would have to be unbelievably slow to counterbalance the volume and usefulness of Firefox extensions.
They are loading the image and HTML files from a local hard drive. So it doesn't really matter that Omniweb can load a 12MB HTML file in 7 seconds because over the internet you'll be getting the file much slower than that. It would be interesting if they tested how the browsers render large files with latency factored in.
I heard that all browsers have the same engine, base on Mycrosoft's early development results in this sphere. I doubt, but may be this is partly true?
July 12 2006 at 12:11 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhat about opera/firefox g4/g5/intel optimised builds?
July 12 2006 at 10:45 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Verizon Leather Sleeve for Tablets for $4 + free shipping
- Wicked Jaw Breaker Noise-Isolating In-Ear Headphones for $6 + free shipping
- Refurb Apple MacBook Air Laptops: 12" 64GB SSD for $699 + free shipping
- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



41 Comments