Skip to Content

To Tag or Not to Tag: Punakea and SpotMeta

Everybody knows about the endless wars: Mac vs. PC, Coke vs. Pepsi, Tags vs. Hierarchical Filing... Well, okay, so the last one isn't quite as long-running, but it does seem like a point of controversy. A nice article on theappleblog about Spotlight and meta-data has gotten me thinking again about the whole tagging thing. The file folder metaphor is so strongly embedded in the way many of us long-time computer users think that it's sometimes hard to appreciate the benefits of new ways of doing things. I still instinctively crave hierarchical folder systems and was very happy, for instance, when iTunes finely gained folders (and remain annoyed that Yojimbo doesn't support nested Collection Folders). That said, as big of a stick in the mud as I normally am, del.icio.us (especially with Pukka) and some other tagging implementations have finally got me seeing that tags are definitely useful. At the end of the day, of course, there's no need to choose since neither filing method is exclusive of the other, so I think I'll continue to use both for the foreseeable future.

All of that was a lead-in to a couple of applications that make tagging with OS X easier. Of course, the best thing would be if Leopard included an official tagging mechanism, rather than the improvised systems involving Spotlight comments, but even if it does not there are some tools out there worth looking at if tagging is your thing. First there's Punkaea (donation requested) from nudge:nudge. Punakea features a drawer that pops out of the side of your screen onto which you can drag and drop files. When you do so, it will pop up a small dialog allowing you to define tags for that file. You can then search for tags with Spotlight or use the Tag Cloud within Punakea's browser window to find your files. Punakea can even be set to manage files you drop into it. That is, you can define a folder for Punakea to manage, and whenever you drop a file onto Punakea's application icon it will ask you for the tags and then move that file to the folder, in essence creating a non-hierarchical filing system.

SpotMeta, an open-source project from Ben Summers, takes a different approach, which is more integrated into the Finder, but also seems a bit more limited as to the practical number of tags possible. With SpotMeta you must first define your tags or "keys"in the application, and then whenever you want to tag a file, you just right-click in the Finder and select "Edit Metadata with SpotMeta...". (or alternatively you can select the file and then hit SpotMeta's Hotkey combo). This will bring up an editing window in which you can chose one of your pre-defined "keys" or tags. Finally, when you want to find you tagged files, you can just use Spotlight directly or search by Kind with the Finder search box.

Of course, in addition to these two applications, there's also the very handy File Tagging plugin for Quicksilver.

Thanks to Steve for the SpotMeta tip!

[Edit: fixed SpotMeta description; turns out it's not as new as I had thought]



Everybody knows about the endless wars: Mac vs. PC, Coke vs. Pepsi, Tags vs. Hierarchical Filing... Well, okay, so the last one isn't quite...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

15 Comments

Filter by:
Jeff Flowers

I have been so disappointed with Spotlight that I disable it on my Mac. Reading about these utilities has me reconsidering that decision.

If you invest heavily in tagging your files, be sure that you are using a backup method that preserves all metadata. There were some very imformitive articles on the PlasticsFurniture blog that pointed out that many utilities are lax where metadata is concerned. You can read more here:

http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/

SuperDuper was the only utility that really saved everything.

February 06 2007 at 3:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Pierre Bernard

SpotMeta being fully integrated into Spotlight, the tags created using SpotMeta may be used for search criteria in HoudahSpot (http://www.houdahspot.com). I guess I should some day blog about the workflow of filing, cataloging and retrieving such created.

February 05 2007 at 6:12 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tod

Full disclosure: I'm a 64-YO old fuddy duddy who's been working as a *user* of computers since the late 1960s; been a happy Mac user since 1985.

So here hardly a day goes by when I don't see something here or on other Mac blogs or in Version Tracker alluding to "tags" and "tagging." I'm having a hard time learning about what tags are and why they'd be useful for me.

From what I can tell, tagging seems to be a means of adding "metadata" to files and folders, data that more completely describe the contents of the file than a simple filename or the folder hierarchy. So far, so good, right?

So a couple of years ago I bought and started using an app called Shoebox where I could go through thousands of digital images and tag them with all sorts of expressive tags. The trouble is, I got through perhaps 150 before my eyes crossed and my typing fingers got tired.

So now tagging is becoming more pervasive it seems, and I think that tagging is a good addition to anyone's box of utilities. However, the thing that bothers me is the time needed initially to rummage through perhaps tens of thousands of files and folders and create meaningful tags for them. So is there some way of easing this burden? I don't particularly want to spend a good percentage of my remaining years (though I'll live to 90) tagging, for gosh sakes.

By the way, the article and followup comments were quite interesting. thanks, folks.

-Tod

February 05 2007 at 12:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rex Pechler

If you're interested in more than filing your stuff away, check out SpotlightFS, developed for MacFUSE. It's an extension of Apple's Smart Folders, in that it will show any smart folders in ~/Library/Saved Searches/ but you can actually have them mounted and use them from the terminal, as well as browse new folders and spotlight results will show up dynamically. It's interesting, but I haven't really found it very useful myself yet. I guess it's a hint at what Apple could do in the future, if tagging is integrated into the OS.

What I'm mainly using Punakea for, is clearing my desktop. I don't think it's the best, but it works and it's fast.

Now all I want to set up some sort of alert that will tell me when one of my tags reaches 4.4 GB so I can burn a DVD archive.

February 04 2007 at 8:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Clark

Tagging in the finder takes up too much time and requires too much thought.

February 04 2007 at 7:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Adam Rice

In the hopes of re-clarifying something about Spotmeta: there's not real limit on tags, as far as I can tell. You can make up as many tags on the fly as you want; you're not constrained to using a controlled vocabulary at all.

February 04 2007 at 6:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Samuel Oltz

I should probably tell you what it does! The script puts a spotlight comment on each file in your document folder's subfolders based on each parent folder's name up to the document folder. So for every file in ~/Documents/School/Fall 2006/English, each will be giving the comment English Fall 2006 School. The script won't overwrite existing comments (hopefully), and shows a progress dialog.

February 04 2007 at 4:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Samuel Oltz

Reading this post reminded me of my unfinished project to convert my hierarchal documents folder to a spotlight comments based documents folder. I dusted off my incomplete Applescript and finished it. If anyone finds this useful, pass it on! http://www.freewebtown.com/pianomansam/Folders2Tags-1.0.scpt

February 04 2007 at 4:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
aron t

It would be nice if Leopard (or some other application) would make tagging in Finder as easy at it is with the use of Ken Ferry's "Keyword Assistant" in iPhoto.

February 04 2007 at 2:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Pete

Personally I'm far more comfortable with a hierarchical system -- it just seems more natural and less cluttered to me.

Of course, that assumes you don't have a large number of things that belong in multiple places (tricky in a hierarchical system, but not so bad in finder (for example) with smart folders, etc).

February 04 2007 at 12:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.