Skip to Content

Estimating a Mac's lifespan

I'm pretty sure we've all experience the same hesitation when buying new Mac: snap one up now, or wait until a new model arrives? And when will that new model arrive?

Mactactic tires to eliminate some of the guesswork by estimating a model's shelf life. For instance, right now the Airport Extreme is rated a "buy," as it's brand new, and the Mac Pro is rated "Caution: May be updated."

It's all based on guessing, of course, but still fun.

Thanks, Brady!

Categories

Hardware iBook iMac

I'm pretty sure we've all experience the same hesitation when buying new Mac: snap one up now, or wait until a new model arrives? And when...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

9 Comments

Filter by:
Macintologist

Yes, Macrumors has done the same thing, but this new website is much prettier.

February 18 2007 at 1:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ncc

Well, it's french, but consomac.fr has been doing this for ages, and has usually been pretty accurrate - thanks to this site, I've postponed my Mac Book Pro purchase until sept 2006 and got a Core2Duo for the price of a CoreDuo !

February 18 2007 at 1:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
wim nerinckx

That is shelf-life span. What about a real life span estimate? Would Leopard support G3 macs, many of which still being very useful and relyable computers?

February 17 2007 at 6:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
proton

Pity they haven't even verified their data:

The Mac Pro was not released July 8th, 2006 as they claim, but on August 7th, 2006.

Messing up US-style and rest-of-the-world-style dates can be a problem.

February 16 2007 at 11:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mactactic

Heh - thanks for the advice Brady :)

When I've found an article that pertains directly to a model, I'll link it. If you click on the 5th gen ipod at the bottom of the homepage, there's a link to an Ars article.

I could always pull an RSS feed with some filters though. I only actually finished the site about 5 days ago, so there's still a lot of scope for change and development.

February 16 2007 at 8:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brady J. Frey

I like MacRumors as much as the next, but you have to admit it's almost sinfully ugly to look at - Mactactic atleast is more appealing a read, and that's worth a lot from print to web reading... especially in a mac world. About all that macrumors has is, well, linking to rumors - Mactactic could do that by publishing the recent RSS feeds of every major news site right under the device if they wanted too (hint):)

February 16 2007 at 8:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mactactic

I've posted about macrumours vs mactactic on the blog at mactactic:

http://mactactic.com/blog/2007/feb/16/mactactic-vs-macrumors/

February 16 2007 at 7:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brady J. Frey

You're welcome:) Tom Hesser at http://maccentricsolutions.com/ gave me the tip off first!

February 16 2007 at 5:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Raymond Brigleb

Hasn't MacRumors been doing that forever now?

http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/

February 16 2007 at 5:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.