Computerworld on why Macs are worthy for the enterprise

Hey David,
Thanks for linking to my article, I am glad you liked it. It is my first (of hopefully many) for Computerworld. While we have many ideas in development, if there's anything anyone would like us to write on in the Apple/Enterprise space, let us know!

Thanks again!
Seth

Well you can't please everybody now can you.

But now the wrong thing is linked. I would expect a link to "Seth Weintraub at Computerworld" would take me to a list of his articles. It needs to be clear that the link is to THIS article!

Article now linked in the post. Sorry about the mixup guys.

And #2: it is actually our policy to link directly to an article we're writing about. I simply didn't do it this time, but you'll find the majority of our posts adhere to this standard.

The problem is that the totally unintuitive "Read" should really be "Read Linked Article" or "Read Source Article". Just "Read" begs the question of what am I going to be reading.

Seriously? No link to the article?

Love the site, don't want to be a nag, but why do you have two links in the article, neither of which go to the article you're refering to?

You should look at how Slashdot stories are edited. When reading a TUAW story I want to know more about my ratio is usually:

33% link that I thought went to the article actually takes me somewhere unexpected (like the random link to WWDC above)
33% can't find link at all (like article above)
33% link goes to the place I want it to go

I wonder if there are any good courses, or articles on web linking and how to make your links more intuitive. I wonder if Stephen Krug (of "Don't Make Me Think" fame has anything to say on this matter?

Jason
www.gravityswitch.com

You can avoid the pageview inflaction by linking to the print version.

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticleBasic&articleId=9012644