Get the right HDTV for your Apple TV

I have component IN on my TV, but it only does 480i. I have been told the Apple TV will not work on my TV, which is kind of strange, since I hook my video iPod up to it all the time, and play movies that I have ripped or purchased from iTunes, so I don't understand the HD requirement.

So why does the recommendation include a Vizio that's a couple of models behind their current offering? You can get their 47" 1080p LCD or a 50" plasma for $1699. Heck, you can get a 42" plasma or LCD for $1000.

I know there are other brands just as good or better in this price range, but we nabbed one of the Vizio 37" LCDs for just $700 (with coupon), and I've been so happy with it I'm going back for the 47".

@mingistech:

Right, but they have to be re-encoded via QT for AppleTV playback, no? At the very least, they have to be imported into iTunes.

And, even if neither of those things are true, AppleTV SHOULD be compatible with SDTVs. The resolutions they sell would look fine on such a TV; there is no reason to limit the outputs to HD-only.

IF A-TV can stream ANYTHING i've downloaded / ripped from ANYWHERE, then it is a good thing. This is better than and Xbox360, which (natively) can only stream .wmv video files. Still, it's a better investment to go with a Mini, which can stream anything, and you can have Handbrake right there to back up all of your DVDs.

I'll pass on A-TV, and save up for a MacMini-based Media Center.

I agree, I would love having an Apple TV, but having to pay at least £600 in addition to the price of the box to get a TV to replace the one I got 2 years ago is completely nuts.

I think it's way to early for this kind of product to be HDTV only. And how much could it have cost to add a composite SDTV output at the back?

>I, not being an expert, mind you, would think that as long as your tv has component video inputs (many standard defs do), you'll be ok.

Nope, you won't 480i and 480P are very different signals. If your set expects a 480i signal and you give it a 480P signal, it WILL NOT SYNC. No picture.
It might even DAMAGE your TV.

The assumption that HD is coming to iTMS has to be correct. Has anyone noted the unbelievably fast downloads from the iTMS lately? The speed has jumped more than 10 fold. Apple is clearly ramping services towards video downloads.

@ Mikey

Cheap WS TVs aren't really the point. The point is if I am not in the market for a new tv (as I'm not, I have a buying cycle for it and I am two years away) but want the features of streaming content from my macs to me tv (as I am), then why should I spend a grand (at least) on a still kinda sub-par Widescreen + cables (100 bucks) and if you want to do it right, a wall mount ($250). So that's $1,650 PLUS tax (here in canada brings the total to a stunning $1,881) just to run a $300 item. I have no problems what so ever with this product, i just think working in standard def should have been a given. I also think it's asinine to suggest that everyone should go out a buy a new tv because of a $300 product's lack of compatibility with what the majority have in their living-rooms currently.

Re: edmund

There is TONS of 720p video online you can download to your Mac or PC for playback on the AppleTV.

I have over 50 HD-DVD and BluRay rips ready for my AppleTV.

I've been using the latest beta of VisualHub for conversion. It has a built-in profile for the AppleTV.

Interestingly my Playstation 3 plays back these HD rips encoded for the AppleTV natively.

If anyone is interested in getting into the HD scene I suggest HDBits.org it's an amazing site.

I guess they're not aware that there are HDTV's out there that are less than $1,000.

Yeah give a Mac mini over an Apple TV anyday!