Phynchronicity: Fink GUI
Everybody knows that at the heart of OS X lies a powerful UNIX/BSD installation, but actually installing UNIX software can be a bit of pain, requiring command line trickery at least, and sometimes even compiling from the source (and dealing with dependencies, etc.). Fortunately, the Fink package management system goes a long way toward making this easier by packing much of the software in a relatively easy to use format. However, Fink still requires some command line chops, so Phynchronicity takes the Fink idea to the next level. It's an OS X GUI for installing Fink packages that's as simple as navigating through the categories and hitting the install button.Phynchronicity is $20 and a demo is available (Fink must already be installed on your system).
[Via MacNN]
Share
Categories
Everybody knows that at the heart of OS X lies a powerful UNIX/BSD installation, but actually installing UNIX software can be a bit of...
Add a Comment
MacPorts has less packages, too, since it doesnât like including GPL stuff (or at least I think so; most Fink packages that arenât on MacPorts are GPL'd).
April 15 2007 at 1:01 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply@Rob
Fink is still very active, but I think gets a bad rap because most people's first impressions is with binary package installs which is (admittedly) out of date, and with "stable" which is also very out of date. Fink unstable (which is the equivalent of MacPorts) is pretty actively maintained and up-todate.
We are (slowly) getting the infrastructure set up to do automated bindist builds, which should alleviate some of those first-impression issues. :)
@Jon #4,
Fink is under a lot of development as it is. The core application is not developed extensively, but the packages are maintained fairly well.
I would also like to let all of the FinkCommander people know that I am currently in the process of re-writing FinkCommander (it needs it, trust me) in PyObjC, but I don't expect to have a release anytime soon.
I would also like to know the answer to this question. Which is better fink or MacPorts?
It seems that MacPorts is more up-to-date.
What are the pros and cons of fink vs. MacPorts?
I tried out their MacPorts gui, PortAuthority, a while back and I was fairly unimpressed. It added an unnecessary level of complexity to an otherwise simple command-line utility, I thought. So if this product is anything like it, I'd skip it.
On another note, I'm just surprised anyone still uses fink...the project looked fairly dead to me last time I checked it out, so I switched over to macports because the community seemed more active. Anyone using fink that can verify this?
Overpriced crap methinks. I can just type "fink install nessus" and it does the same job.
April 14 2007 at 11:39 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply20$??? For what? FinkCommander is free, is Phynchronicity really better?
April 14 2007 at 11:38 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyFinkCommander is free and does the same job.
April 14 2007 at 11:09 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- miFrame Picture Frame Dock for iPad for $64 + $8 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
- Hannspree Apple-Shaped 28" 1080p LCD HDTV for $270 + free shipping
- Philips wOOx Alarm Clock Radio for Apple iPod / iPhone for $60 + free shipping
- iWatchz Elemetal Collection Bracelet for iPod nano for $75 + free shipping
- iFrogz Luxe Lean Hard Case for iPod touch for $10 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



8 Comments