Filed under: Video, Odds and ends, Apple
Get A Mac UK ad: Office Posse

Yet another Get A Mac ad has surfaced, though this time it is the British version that has a new addition. The ad, called 'Office Posse,' features PC, Mac, and Microsoft Office (those are the people in the colorful suits). Office runs just fine on the Mac, and it is implied that Office would rather run on the Mac (who wouldn't?). Another clever, if not compelling, Get A Mac ad.
Thanks to everyone who sent this in.

![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
yjs said 6:36PM on 4-23-2007
Office 2004 runs like ass on Rosetta.
Reply
Austin said 6:48PM on 4-23-2007
#1, True, but then again, it does on XP too.
Reply
CT said 7:16PM on 4-23-2007
I'm shocked at the poor compositing for an Apple commercial. The PC guy has no shadow and he looks like he's floating. The Mac and Office guys, albeit subtle, do.
Reply
Ondra Soukup said 7:12PM on 4-23-2007
Now get the f*** Access on Mac...just because of my schooldwork :/
Reply
running said 7:17PM on 4-23-2007
MS office (whatever number) is VERY slow on intel Macs and this ad is simply lie.
Reply
running said 7:19PM on 4-23-2007
Ondro Soukupe (modráku, haxx0re, whatever :))), I doubt Access will ever be on Mac OS X. That's one of prices Mac user has to pay.
Reply
ian said 8:02PM on 4-23-2007
I thought the ad was great! LOL great!
BTW, I run a 24" iMac and find that with the exclusion of start-up times, office runs perfectly under Rosetta.
Stop flamen winging! At least you have something to complain about :P
Reply
sam said 8:10PM on 4-23-2007
they should've waited to release this ad until after they had a native intel version. office does run like ass on rosetta. how come it's taking so long for microsoft to release a univeral binary version? maybe bill is holding out on purpose...
Reply
Kevin Crossman said 2:44AM on 4-24-2007
This ad is absolutely great!! They NEED to do this for the USA.
MS Office runs a lot faster on my iMac core duo 1.83 than it did on my PB G4 1.33. It works just fine.
Reply
Jon said 8:41PM on 4-23-2007
"how come it's taking so long for microsoft to release a univeral binary version? maybe bill is holding out on purpose..."
Of course he is. Think how many resources MS has. They could get it done in a month if they wanted to.
They'll release it late and then cripple it (no VBA support).
Reply
Reg Muffet said 9:22PM on 4-23-2007
@yjs > "Office 2004 runs like ass on Rosetta."
I find it runs just fine. The time from double-clicking an .xls file to being able to edit the columns is 12.6 secs on a freshly booted machine, and 4.7 secs on the second launch.
Maybe your problem is memory: Rosetta needs a bit of memory, especially when the first Rosetta app is launched. Any system using Rosetta apps should have 2 GB, imho.
Of course, I do have a 3.0GHz Mac Pro with RAID drive, so I'm skewed towards seeing good performance across the board.
Relatively speaking though, I don't find Office (PowerPC) a problem, and it ran fine when I set it up on a Mac Book Pro for a colleague.
Reply
msr said 9:49PM on 4-23-2007
I like the UK ads a lot better than the US ones. I mean, what a great personification of Office! They're very clever.
Reply
john russell said 12:12AM on 4-24-2007
I really do dig those suits.
Reply
Klemens said 8:14AM on 4-24-2007
So....ehhh.... what about the pink guy? Isn't he supposed to be Access? On a Mac?
Reply
Klemens said 8:18AM on 4-24-2007
Oh...nevermind. Entourage. The email-client I don't use. But I bet millions of Windows-users will think he's supposed to be Access...
Reply
jsmcalees said 2:39PM on 4-24-2007
2 disappointments with MS Office Mac….
-One there is no access
-Two I almost never touch my mouse in excel as I use it all day at work (on my POS Dell… not by choice!) but then when I get on my Mac I slow down tremendously as I cannot use my ALT or CTRL shortcuts….
Anyone know any fixes to this besides using a PC???
Reply