Filed under: Software, Video, Productivity
TUAW Exclusive: Video of Pixelmator in action
The moment I saw John Gruber link Pixelmator - a powerful new Core Image-based image editor with support for layers, a wide variety of tools, iLife/iPhoto, Automator and more - I had to get a closer look. I remember the days of Apple hyping Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger and all the power of Core Image, and then never seeing a formidable editor make use of them. Sure there are a few apps that make use of Core Image in one way or another, but nothing really struck me as truly leveraging all there was to leverage in Apple's Core image.
While Pixelmator may technically be vaporware according to Gruber, I managed to snag an exclusive demonstration video of the app in action from its developers, brothers Aidas and Saulius Dailide (who you might be interested to know also founded Jumsoft). The demo showcases some impressive Pixelmator features, including working with multiple layers and objects, opening Photoshop files and moving layers from one image to another, taking a picture with an iSight camera and embedding it into the current working image, and even some slick blending modes.
From what I see here, I can definitely say 'wow', especially since Pixelmator is expected to ship in late July for only $59. Stay tuned for more info as soon as we can nab it.
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Adam Betts said 7:28PM on 5-31-2007
Beautiful. I was hoping to see a preview of Layer palette window in action but that's okay :)
Reply
Ruegen said 7:31PM on 5-31-2007
What photoshop should be!
Reply
Jonathan Johnson said 7:33PM on 5-31-2007
I recently found ChocoFlop, and despite it being a prerelease version, it works pretty darn well for me.
Reply
hmurchison said 7:40PM on 5-31-2007
I'll take it
Reply
! said 7:49PM on 5-31-2007
Now THAT is cool.
Let's all look forward to dumping those traitorous bastards at Adobe, who continue to develop their Mac applications as though they were destined for PCs.
Reply
jason said 7:49PM on 5-31-2007
Where's the video?
I tried every link here, and none go to a video...
Jason
www.gravityswitch.com
Reply
! said 7:56PM on 5-31-2007
@jason: The link under the screenshot, "Click to Play."
Reply
andrew harrison said 8:33PM on 5-31-2007
looks pretty good. maybe instead of cs3?
Reply
XGM said 8:37PM on 5-31-2007
Adobe, well i cant complain too much since i do like CS3 on the mac somewhat more... But please, as a 2D graphics enthusiast take advantage of Leopard, just like this is taking advantage of OS X.
None the less, CS 3 is great on my Mac (and windows on boot camp too)
ps, it talks about open source, will it be open source too ? (note, my love of open source is coming out :P)
Reply
Rik Williamson said 9:12PM on 5-31-2007
Hue me unimpressed...
Obviously in Photoshop, all this is possible, with equal to superior fluidity. CS3 has a great blend of usability and the ability to retain all of its power and magic. Besides, I can't wait to start playing around with PS's 3D tools and environment.
Pixelmator seems like it could be an okay toy to "play" with, like iphoto is...
Speaking of which, I have to figure out which way I am going to go– APERTURE or LIGHTROOM, but thats an entire different story...
Reply
Nic Wise said 10:46PM on 5-31-2007
Wow. Sign me up. This is what I've been looking for - iphoto is too light, aperture too confusing, and CS3 too heavy. Looks perfect.
Beta's, anyone? ;-)
Reply
Bryan said 10:59PM on 5-31-2007
I know it sounds lame but I've always been a bit disappointed that I didn't find an equivalent to MS Paint in OS X for those times you just need to do a little something to an image.
Reply
Dave Chartier said 11:30PM on 5-31-2007
#12: I think GraphicConverter is still coming on most Macs these days. Check for it in the Applications folder, or possibly /Applications/Utilities/. If you don't see it, have you re-installed Mac OS X at all? I'm not sure if it gets re-installed by default.
Of course I could simply be wrong, and Macs don't come with it anymore.
Reply
Matt W said 11:52PM on 5-31-2007
Rik,
I've tried both, and I personally have liked Lightroom better. I'm a beginner with SLRs and it seems easier to use. That said, you should definitely trial both. They're strangely similar and different.
Reply
Mark Thomas said 12:01AM on 6-01-2007
I've been waiting a long freaking time for somebody to write an app that leverages all the cool technologies in OS X and finally frees me completely from the dead weight of Adobe Inc. Photoshop is the only Adobe app I still use, having at last weaned myself from the rest of their bloated, buggy, schizophrenic application suite. Pixelmator looks sweet, and I dig the black on black GUI. Bring it on!
Reply
The AntiChrist said 12:31AM on 6-01-2007
I love the way Gruber hijacks a word like vaporware to mean something announced instead of something way overdue from its stated release date. I guess he has no imagination.
Reply
michel said 2:52AM on 6-01-2007
>I love the way Gruber hijacks a word like vaporware
>to mean something announced instead of
>something way overdue from its stated release date.
>I guess he has no imagination.
http://daringfireball.net/2006/12/omnivapor
Bashing Gruber is already starting ? I thought it would get one or 2 more years. jealousy I suppose.
well, it's a vaporware because it hyped but not available, even in a beta.
(the same way were omnifocus, windows cairo, iphone, duke nukem forever and so on. some products are real in the end, some others not)
now, thanks to the video, it helps to remove the "vaporware" state of that project.
Gruber is not evil you know. you can read his website and why he used the word vaporware.
Reply
doug said 5:40AM on 6-01-2007
Rik W (comment 10) and Matt W (12):
Have you tried Astroturf?
Reply
Michael May said 6:03AM on 6-01-2007
Whoa, looks pretty slick. Yowza.
Reply
Steve said 7:47AM on 6-01-2007
My issue with Gruber's usage is that it applies a demeaning label to basically *any* software announcement that doesnt follow the strict parameter of being available NOW. There is a term for that, and it doesnt insult the developers: it's called "unreleased".
It is clear to most sensible people what Vaporware means, and that is indeed long anounced, long delayed, long NEVER SEEN applications.
Even before this videocast, Pixelmator wasn't, nor deserved to be called, vaporware. They announced a date. Give them a chance to release it. If that slips, then maybe the v-word has some merit.
One last thought: What if Gruber was allowed to personally demo Pixelmator? Would he still call it vaporware?
Reply