Yes, the most recent rumor about Apple's announcement tomorrow has been debunked by commenters and other sites, but this one stems from a scheduled maintenance message Apple has posted on their oft-debated .Mac service page (tip of the hat to reader Jake Coventry). Quoth Apple's message at www.mac.com:Due to scheduled maintenance, .Mac members might be intermittently unable to access some .Mac services from 10 AM to 12 PM PDT on 08/07/2007. We apologize for any inconvenience.
While this doesn't necessarily guarantee .Mac will be getting any kind of upgrade or new features, it is a bit uncharacteristic for the service to tell its users about such a major downtime before it happens. On top of that, this outage is happening during the day of a big announcement that Apple clearly stated was going to be all about the Mac. Here's hoping for the best.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-06-2007 @ 2:42PM
Michael Rose said...
Oooch! Think you... missed the... spleen there, David... move that knife over a smidge -- ah, better.
:-)
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 2:43PM
theodorelee said...
As a .Mac user, all I can say is... ABOUT DAMN TIME.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 2:50PM
Scott said...
...and the top "tip" on the .mac home page is "Is your browser up to date?". Maybe they want to prep everyone for the refresh...
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 3:03PM
Eli Hodapp said...
I'm glad you were able to overcome your unbridled rage regarding the revealing of Fake Steve in order to continue posting here. You truly are a hero of the people, David.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 3:05PM
Joe said...
Down for two hours? Does that mean the announcement might be two hours long?
Searching for clues is fun!
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 3:11PM
shadownight said...
It's "à la iPhoto", not "a là iPhoto". A nitpick, I know, but I need to defend the use of my mother tongue ;)
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 3:41PM
David Chartier said...
I highly doubt the announcement will span two hours. Even the major Macworld/WWDC keynotes rarely last quite that long. However, each time .Mac has gone down in recent memory to add new features, the .Mac outage announcement stated a two-hour downtime period.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 4:12PM
jaime said...
i think .mac is the maybe the most shameful way that apple has of insulting its customers today. having said that, i'm also very frustrated at how darn convenient it is, and i use it at least weekly, if not daily.
if only - please please please - apple is going to announce changes to .mac that will make the $99 conscionable. fortunately, i don't ahve the sting of paying for it (i get it free from my company) but as a consumer advocate i shudder at the product.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 4:18PM
Christopher Shaw said...
Down 2 hours tomorrow?!?!? How about the 2+ hrs (and counting) that I can't get my .mac mail today?
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 4:23PM
Jason said...
I think the best change for .Mac would be a $99 reduction in yearly fees. Other than that I think it's a swell service.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 4:25PM
David Chartier said...
"It's the .Mac-only Dashboard widgets!" LOL! I nearly spit out my water. I harped about those things a while back but forgot about them since then.
Personally, I'm not that excited for new iMacs because I'm happy as a camper with the current models. For me, software announcements would be much more interesting - iLife '07/08 and .Mac FTW!
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 5:59PM
j2d2 said...
I haven't used .mac since they announced it wasn't free anymore. I miss it. But I'm not going back until it's free, or at least until they have "scaling" service levels, such as "free", "extended" and "pro".
Basically it's the sync stuff that I can't live without. Syncing iCal and Address Book across multiple computers (I have 3 plus iPhone) seems like, in this day and age, should be a standard and free service. I love iCal but I can't really use it unless the info is synced across all my machines.
Sync with Google Cal would be swell too!
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 6:02PM
Blair said...
Eli -
Jesus... give it a rest dude. Everyone makes mistakes. David's entitled to some as well. Do all of your comments have to be invectives against him?
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 7:35PM
Kurt Vander Bogart said...
.MAC should go the way of e-world. In fact, e-world was much better. .MAC is an under performing Apple service, unless, of course you want to sync, your Safari bookmarks. Yippee!
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 8:21PM
Michael B. said...
And yet everyone seems to forget that during The D in May, when Steve and Bill were on stage ntogether with Walt . Here the iTunes link:
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=256972720
I can't remember where it is but this is what was said:
Walt "When you bought a Mac, you had this internet service back end called .Mac and I think a lot of people feel you haven't developed it much"
Steve "I couldn't agree w/ you more, and I think we'll make up for lost time in the near feature"
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 8:23PM
roz said...
I still use .mac and find it indispensable for a home-business I have created. I wish it would add filemaker database hosting, I think that is a no brainer and would greatly improve the utility of it as a solution. Really FMP and dot mac, together with ilife and desktop apps could create an incredible web publishing platform. I would really like to see that sort of evolution.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 8:31PM
Buckeye77 said...
I can't figure out why i bought .Mac to begin with. email accounts ending in .Mac should be free with your computer and then you should be able to spend some cash if you want to upgrade your account.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 9:31PM
john russell said...
If you look at this video from D5:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=OhDL48ulKyw
Steve mentions "backend internet services," possibly hinting at a .Mac refresh, or even a total overhaul.
Reply
8-06-2007 @ 10:17PM
Victor Agreda Jr said...
well it'd be hard for Apple to make .Mac any worse, but one can dream... (I should probably backup my old homepage.mac content tonight huh?)
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 6:57AM
ferg said...
When I turned on my Mac this morning it said that synching would change more than 5% of my ical entries. As it turns out it changed (although not in a way I understand) 44 entries.
Reply