We reported that Office 2008 for the Mac has been delayed until January 2008, which means you'll have to use the beta file converter before you can open Word 2007 for Windows documents on your Mac (Office 2007 introduced a new file format called Office Open XML which Office 2004 for the Mac doesn't support. The converter dumbs down the file so Office for the Mac can open it).Sure, you could do that, or you could use the first word processor for the Mac that supports that file format natively: Pages '08. That's right, Apple's little word processor that could can open Word 2007 documents (and earlier). It doesn't just open them either, Apple says that styles, tables, and other parts of the document are intact as well.
That sound you just heard? The MacBU screaming in frustration.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-07-2007 @ 5:50PM
Mo said...
Yes, but… does it support ODF?
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 6:00PM
Donald said...
And will the "track changes" option work with Pages?
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 6:01PM
David said...
I'm pretty sure this isn't the first that opens them, as Neo Office has opened them for awhile.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 6:04PM
Michael Rose said...
Apple's page on Pages says it will preserve tracked changes.
woot.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 6:34PM
Alan said...
Like David said, NeoOffice has had this for several months now.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 6:48PM
JD said...
Can I set it so that it also saves to Word format by default?
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 7:04PM
jonas said...
perhaps becuase its an open format?! lol tuaw.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 7:16PM
Geoff said...
It's a little more broad-reaching than Pages, folks ... Pages, Keynote, and Numbers ALL import and export their Office 2007 equivalent formats. That's huge.
Not only did they beat everyone else on the Mac (NeoOffice currently opens xlsx and pptx only in the paid early-access experimental version), but they did it the week MS announced a several-month delay of the "real" Office 2008.
NIIIIICE. If this works 2/3rds as well as I expect, I'm never looking back.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 7:35PM
Bill Olson said...
"That sound you just heard? The MacBU screaming in frustration."
BIG smile!!! (laughing actually)
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 8:51PM
Christian said...
Good. I'm tired of people treating the Mac BU like it's a demigod simply because it brings a huge and important application to the Mac. That's fine, but they need a kick in the ass for competition as badly as anybody. 30 months to ship a Universal Binary (with possibly the biggest development group of any Mac developer outside of Apple itself)?
Mac BU, I hope you're listening: Time to kick it into high gear. The last thing your higher-ups want is for Apple to pull with iWork what they did with Safari: a sexy, compelling Windows port.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 9:02PM
William Brawley said...
dugg! - http://digg.com/apple/Suck_it_MacBU_Apple_Pages_08_can_open_Microsoft_s_Open_XML_format
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 9:11PM
MysteryQuest said...
So we can use Pages to convert Word 2007 to pre 2007 formats. Nice going. I wonder how long it takes before Microsoft discontinues Office for Mac and Apple will take over some engineers.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 9:52PM
techn0phile said...
This IS Huge. I would be happy to not have to rely on MS's lackluster support of the Office Suite for Mac.
One question why did this take so long? I would think this would be a priority over Aperature. MS Makes more money from Office than it does from Windows.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 10:24PM
Stephen P said...
I'll believe it when I see it. Between TextEdit, NeoOffice, OpenOffice, Pages 06, AppleWorks and Bean, I can never get complex Word documents to open remotely accurately. If the new Pages can open Word documents with tables and bullets correctly, then they've achieved a major computing milestone. Hopefully someone on the MacWeb will put this to the test...ahem...
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 10:31PM
Joe Eversole said...
I think Gruber said it best
Translation: Microsoft, go fuck yourselves. This is the “bring it on” release of iWork.
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 12:34AM
Andy said...
Hate to disappoint--but the Apple site says that iWork will import the Open XML files, but it doesn't say it can actually generate/export them (just says ".doc" etc, which is the old, non-XML format). That means you're going to see degradation of any feature that is in a newer version of Office that relies on the XML files (e.g. Office 2007).
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 3:10AM
PSM said...
Heh. I am one of those people who has never fully converted to Apple's apps because I don't mind Office too much and it's more "compatible." Well now that Apple's own productivity apps are more Office-compatible than Office, maybe we won't need MS by the time January rolls around.
I'll be heading to my local Apple Store for iWork (and iLife) in the morning, and I'm looking forward to making the attempt to get Office out of my life (except Entourage, at this point).
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 4:00AM
Michael said...
Does Pages in iWork 08 open Open Document files?
I've seen no comment _anywhere_ on this. I can't test, because I haven't yet got iWork 08 myself.
I guess what people are mostly looking for is compatibility with Ms products, because that's what most of the world is using. However, it would be nice to know whether Pages can now handle ODT or not, since that's a format that could well become more prevalent in the future.
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 4:21AM
Kishen said...
It's all very well iLife supporting the new MS2007 file formats, however until Apple actually makes Mail.app (or something better) completely compatible with MS Exchange server, then many of us business users will still need MS Office for Entourage. I tried Mail app with my 2Gig exchange mailbox and the poor thing nearly choked. Completely useless. If Apple can 1-up microsoft on the email front here, that would be the final nail in the coffin. Until then, iLife 08 is just a "nice to have", not an MS office killer.
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 10:04AM
Morgan said...
Important to remember in all this discussion about OOXML being "Microsoft only" - Apple is a FOUNDING member of the OOXML coalition. In fact the first OOXML meeting was held on Apple's campus. OOXML is a open standard, regardless of what IBM would have you believe. The big winner should be Mac users, because we are much less likely to ever be left out in the dark again no matter which format a client/employer uses.
It's even more ironic that the people demanding that governments should mandate "ISO open standards" fail to note that the default Pages/Keynote formats are not ISO approved "open standards". This only serves to underscore that the format wars we see between ODF and OOXML are nothing more than marketing plays by the big vendors. Saying that one should be government mandated is like saying the government should mandate "Coke" and ban "Pepsi".
Reply