Rapidweaver 3.6.3 hits the tubes

- Greatly improved memory usage when exporting websites
- Fixed issues with bold/color attributes and the main view displaying incorrectly
- Option-Double Clicking on photos now opens the files in a Photo Album
Share
Categories
A quiet morning at TUAW Headquarters (located in scenic Wellsboro, PA, home of the Pennsylvania Grand Canyon); we're all pooped from...
Add a Comment
@Cowicide: I don't think RapidWeaver is intended to replace Dreamweaver. But there's no reason a professional can't use it to speed development of smaller sites or prototype larger sites. Not every site requires to massive bloat of Dreamweaver to get off the ground.
September 20 2007 at 8:48 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI tried iWeb for about a half hour and never touched it again. Then I became a big fan of Sandvox for over a year--I just loved the total WYSIWYG approach they use and the "pagelets". Unfortunately it's still kind of buggy and slow. I had tried RapidWeaver during that time and I hated it just like I hated iWeb. The "styled text" page which uses a word-processing metaphor just bugged the hell out of me. But about a month ago I gave it another try, discovered the Markdown plugin, and now I love it. It's rock-solid and there is a ton of third-party content. On the minus side it's not terribly intuitive and the sidebar support sucks. But my customers (actually, friends :)) seem more impressed with the results I get out of RapidWeaver than Sandvox, so I'm happy with it for now.
September 20 2007 at 5:31 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyiWeb is infinitely lame compared to RapidWeaver. The plugins, snippets, great code, international family of advanced theme makers and tight-knit family make it stellar. I've made websites with both, and iWeb is nowhere close to RapidWeaver's brilliance.
September 20 2007 at 4:41 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyRW is WAY better than iWeb.
I have used both - I prefer RW. iWeb is too slow and limited
Rapidweaver developers put WAY more time and effort into their products than Apple does with iWeb. Apple has more marketing power behind iWeb, but RW has a better overall product. The community surrounding RW is the main selling point for me.
September 20 2007 at 2:27 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyi actually agree. though iWeb starts to choke on larger websites (100+ pages) which is why I eventually left it for straight coding. iWeb remains my layout tool though becuase it's just so good at making boxes ... and stuff :p
September 20 2007 at 1:51 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHow often do you guys move TUAW HQ? Wasn't it in Hyde Park before? I mean, I like Wellsboro (nice town) but I love Chicago so I'm torn.
September 20 2007 at 1:48 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDoes this thing do site management? The only reason I even use Dreamweaver anymore is because it manages all my files and if I change something it fixes up all dependent files automagically.
If this doesn't do it, does anyone know of an app that does, that doesn't cost an arm and a leg?
iweb is infinitely better.
September 20 2007 at 1:28 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Altec Lansing Octiv Duo iDock for $48 + free shipping
- Used Apple iMac 17" Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz for $430 + $28 s&h
- Lounge Deluxe Stand for iPhone / iPod touch for $28 + $8 s&h
- Brookstone Surround-Sound Earbuds for $14 + $7 s&h
- Refurbished Skullcandy Tokidoki Smokin' Buds Mic'd Headset for $5 + $2 s&h
- Stitchway Backup Battery for iPod / iPhone for $5 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



9 Comments