Skip to Content

Firefox 3 to be more integrated with OS


Alex Faaborg has an interesting post up on the visual design of the forthcoming version 3 of Firefox. Basically reversing their long-standing policy of trying to make Firefox look the same across all platforms, version 3.0 will feature OS specific design "to achieve an even closer level of visual integration than we have had in previous releases." What this means of OS X is something close to the new unified style that's coming in Leopard and has already been demonstrated in iTunes and iLife '08.

I know that many Mac users prefer Camino to Firefox (both of which use the Mozilla gecko rendering engine) because Firefox just doesn't "look right" in OS X. It will be interesting to see how well Firefox 3 works with Leopard (and Tiger) and whether that will be enough to convert Camino users like myself. Of course, as we've mentioned before, the page widgets will also be an important aspect of getting the look right in OS X.

Thanks to everyone who sent this in!


Categories

Software Internet Tools

Alex Faaborg has an interesting post up on the visual design of the forthcoming version 3 of Firefox. Basically reversing their...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

37 Comments

Filter by:
nosebag

But Safari and Camino are not a patch on Firefox when it comes to real-word useablity for me. use several greasemonkey scripts, especially for gmail, and I also use the del.icio.us menu plug-in in place of my bookmark menu. I find these things invaluable and can live with the UI quirks of FF for the sake of them.

October 23 2007 at 10:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chris

You can put a dress on a pig, but its still a pig. The reason I use Camino over FireFox is much more than looks. Firefox just performs too poorly and integrates too poorly on a Mac for day-to-day use.

October 23 2007 at 10:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Cupra

If they fix the start up problem (2 minutes of constant bouncing on a 1.66GHz Intel Core Duo Mac mini w/ 1GB Ram) I'll be happy. Safari 3 loads fine, I'm staying with it.

October 23 2007 at 12:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mr Lizard

Native web widgets (form buttons etc) are already in the nightly builds and look great.

October 22 2007 at 7:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Luigi193

I use Safari 3 with Safari Block (but safariblock won't work in Leopard because it doens't have inputmanger support)

FF isn't fast enough and is ugly...

October 22 2007 at 7:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Fritz Laurel

Yeah, I don't know what these guys were thinking. If we didn't care what our apps looked like or how they functioned, we'd all be using Windows & IE and no one would need Firefox. So, their argument for making it look/work similarly across platforms is ridiculous.

Much props for finally doing native apps, though! I can't wait to see how FF3 turns out.

Cheers,
FL

October 22 2007 at 6:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John

The biggest issues with Firefox and making it look okay on MacOSX is that when you add plugins that change the ui, things go very weird and not at all usable (or even aesthetically nice). I think there is a fundamental issue unless you're willing to compromise somewhere.

I'd much rather, they set about better framework integration so that Mac OS features like the Services menu etc. was really usable from within Firefox.

October 22 2007 at 5:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
K

I'm looking forward to the final release of Safari in a few days. Hopefully it'll fix the memory problems, and also work with Google's offerings a little better.

As for FF, it doesn't support the 'hover cursor over a word and press ctrl+cmd+d to see a quick definition' feature that Safari does :(

October 22 2007 at 4:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tony Santos

Maybe they'll fix the memory leaks in the OS X version finally. Both Firefox (and Camino) sucks on OS X compared to its Windows and Linux counterparts. I love Mozilla, but why can't it run as smoothly (especially when using the flash plug-in) as Webkit based browsers on OS X? I'd take the crummy interface with a fixed engine every time.

October 22 2007 at 4:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
KarlW

If you want more concept shots, take a look at the following link:

http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3/Theme/MacOSX

October 22 2007 at 3:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.