Skip to Content

Things that make Time Machine cranky



Hey there, Austin Powers, are you having trouble getting your Time Machine to be-have? Two Apple tech notes spotted by Macfixit.com point up a pair of issues that may prevent your backup mojo from working.

First, if Time Machine backs up about 10 gigabytes and then stalls out, you probably need to reformat your target drive with either GUID or APM partitioning (depending on whether you're backing up an Intel or a PPC machine; no word on what to do if you plan to back up a mixed environment to the same drive). Second, if your backup files don't show up in the Space: 1999 interface, chances are you've got non-alphanumeric characters in your computer name, and you'll have to change that before TM will work properly. If you've upgraded your computer, you need to give the new machine the same name as the old one.

It's not yet clear why the machine name is crucial to proper TM functionality -- perhaps the path names need to be "UNIX legal" to work with TM's linking scheme? In any case, try these two tips if your Time Machine is trapped in feudal Japan.

[via Macfixit]



Categories

Troubleshooting Leopard

Hey there, Austin Powers, are you having trouble getting your Time Machine to be-have? Two Apple tech notes spotted by Macfixit.com point...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

23 Comments

Filter by:
John Harlow

TimeMachine has been driving me crazy with my MBP. I bought a brand new external Firewire 750G drive and repartitioned it to have 2 GUID partitions.

It did the full backup and ran fine for a couple of days. After that, it would start each backup, but never actually succeed writing data to the disk. I keep seeing errors like "MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting" in my syslog. I can't find info on this anywhere.

I have renamed my internal disk from "Macintosh HD" to "MacintoshHD". I made sure that the external partition that I backup to contains no spaces (its called TimeMachine.) I've also excluded all external volumes, /Library, /Applications, ~/Pictures/Aperture and my VMware & Parallels VM directories.

I gave up today and blew the whole external volume away and started TM over. The full backup is running fine (backing up ~43g in a couple of hours.)

We'll see what happens tomorrow.

December 06 2007 at 10:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to John Harlow's comment
John Harlow

Day 1 went fine, full and incrementals ran. At the end of the day I disconnected the external drive (by ejecting it first) and went home. I came in this AM and reconnected. It wouldn't even schedule the next backup. So I manually initiated one. I've watched preparing for quite a while now...

My syslog is full of this:

Dec 7 08:33:46 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: Backup requested by user
Dec 7 08:33:46 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: Starting standard backup
Dec 7 08:33:46 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: Backing up to: /Volumes/TimeMachine/Backups.backupdb
Dec 7 08:34:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: No pre-backup thinning needed: 100.0 MB requested (including padding), 355.27 GB available
Dec 7 08:34:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (909) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:34:39 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:35:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:35:39 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:36:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:36:39 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:37:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:37:39 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:38:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:38:39 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:39:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:39:39 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting
Dec 7 08:40:09 mystic /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[593]: MDBackupBegin() returned result (906) > 0, waiting

Rats

December 07 2007 at 8:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
robogobo

Look, meganerds, whiners: Time Machine is like most new Apple features- they don't apply to you. It's for your mom, your grandpa and your friend who just bought her first computer. It wasn't designed to backup your 500GB iTunes pirate-drive, and it wasn't designed to backup every minute of everyday without a performance hit. What did you think? If you need a flawless archive and backup solution, set up a RAID system and stfu.

December 06 2007 at 5:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MicNation

So, with regard to the mixed environment...
I have a ppc powerbook and my gf an intelbased macbook.
I also got a 1 tb external for backing up stuff with time machine (and without for stuff like music etc). I got both of them backing up on my Apple partition mapped drive without problems. I had the macbook first backup to a GUID formatted drive, then copied the backup folder over to the Apple Partition mapped drive, where I had backed up my powerbook on a separate partition. I suppose the partition scheme only plays a role in the initial backup where volumes of 10gb or more are created. on both machines I have several backups now. Works like a charm...
Also it works for the networked backup - (ie. with unsupported drives)
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/10/how-to-enable-time-machine-on-unsupported-volumes/

note that you need to open the drives under shared in finder to be able to direct time machine to them

December 02 2007 at 4:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
deslock

Forgot to mention that Carbon Copy Cloner is actually uncrippled donation ware. So if you try it and like it, be sure to kick some money their way.

November 10 2007 at 5:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
deslock

I've had no problems with time machine here (backing up to a firewire HFS+ hdd).

> Time machine blows. What are you supposed to do if you don't have
> enough room to back everything up? For example my itunes is on an
> external 500gig drive. And I have another 500 gig drive for time machine.

I have a similar setup: 120 GB hdd in my laptop, 250 GB external 2.5" hdd for extra media, and a 500 GB external hdd for backing stuff up. I backup the lappy to the 500 GB hdd with time machine nightly. Once/week I also copy everything from the 250 GB hdd to the 500 GB hdd. Would be nice if time machine could backup external volumes but I don't see this as a big deal with freeware programs like Carbon Copy Cloner out there (which work fine for things like media files while Time Machine's search interface comes in handy for documents).

November 10 2007 at 5:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
farfisa

I haven't had any problems with it's functionality except that I can always tell by my machine's performance when it's backing up. Every thing slows down a bit.

(G5 dual 2.0, 3.5 GB RAM, external firewire Seagate 750 GB backing up an internal 320 GB, all HFS extended & journaled)

November 08 2007 at 9:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rob

#1 -- I have heard that the real problem might be with Disk Utility in leopard. When you change the filesystem from FAT32 to HFS+ on an external drive, the drive sometimes does not get formatted with the HFS+ format. Moreover, the partition table might NOT get updated to show that it is a HFS+ partition (even though Disk Utility may say it is a HFS+ partition). As a result, Time Machine treats it as a FAT32 partition. Since FAT32 has a 32 GB maximum size, Time Machine fails when it gets close to the 32 GB limit.

I have heard of one workaround. Create two partitions on the external drive. (WARNING This will destroy all data on the external drive). Then delete the second partition and create only one large HFS+ partition. This apparently will overwrite the partition table with the right info. Give it a try.

November 08 2007 at 9:03 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Liam Parkinson

Or the easiest way, buy a decent external (i got a mybook premium II firewire) format it as Mac OS Extended (Journaled) and point time machine to it.... works fine since.

November 08 2007 at 2:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Fritz Laurel

What, was this programmed by Windows programmers? Seriously, these are stupid, BS type things that I used to see only from Windows programmers back when I used to manage programming teams. Mac programmers never did this kind of stuff.

Cheers
FL

November 08 2007 at 1:46 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Stephen Lang

@7- I'm not sure what you want it to do, create a rift in the time-space continuum so a smaller external HD can be used to store more backup data?

In your particular case, I'd recommend excluding your iTunes library from your Time Machine backup, and backing up your music collection manually to another hard drive.

I bet there are more sophisticated 3rd party options. But for 98% of the Mac user base, the single backup drive model for Time Machine is adequate (and simpler to manage.)

November 07 2007 at 10:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.