Skip to Content

GPS dongle coming for iPhone

We've posted a couple of times about "virtual" GPS solutions for the iPhone that depend on cell tower identification, but now The partfoundry has announced the real deal. They will be offering a GPS dongle for the iPhone based on the SiRF Star III chipset. Needless to say this will require a jailbroken phone and the software "will be open source/community based." They've already got a prototype working (video embedded after the jump) that can report its location and send it to the Google Maps application.

No word yet on how the dongle will affect battery life. They're also working on the iPod touch, but support for it remains to be determined.

The partfoundary GPS module is apparently available for purchase now at $89 and is due to ship in February. Check out the prototype video after the jump.

[via Digg]



We've posted a couple of times about "virtual" GPS solutions for the iPhone that depend on cell tower identification, but now The...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

29 Comments

Filter by:
Bob6stringer

Nice dongle. Some comments above miss the point: Why delay tech development, when innovators can get most of the work - the actual functionality - done beforehand?

January 18 2008 at 7:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Geektronica

Assuming that a bluetooth connection is a viable option, why would you want this thing sticking out of your iPhone? Couldn't it just sit at the bottom of your bag and work just as well?

December 23 2007 at 12:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tom

""Do you need internet access to be able to connect the GPS to the satellite system?"

GPS has nothing to do with internet access. So, no. No internet needed to use any GPS.

December 18 2007 at 2:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
GUnit

They really need to add this to a car charger, or have some way to charge and run the gps. the unit will most likely suck power like crazy. i would so spend around $100 for something that charges while allowing gps at the same time. on longer trips how the hell will the battery last?

December 18 2007 at 3:57 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brady

Also, the law requiring cell phones to have "GPS" is only requiring the ability to triangulate a single phone's position using signal strength from different towers...the same functionality currently used by some GMaps iterations and Navizon's app for the iPhone. It is accurate to only about 3-5 blocks at best, and depends on accuracy of the cell tower position database.

December 18 2007 at 2:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Paul

By law (in the US) GPS is supposed to be in every cell phone introduced after 2006 (for emergency location services). So, I am not sure what's going on with all these phones that "don't" have GPS. Anyone got any insight into this?

It may be that the GPS receiver is extremely limited in functionality (fewer number of channels, minimalistic antenna, both of which could lower price and performance), plus obviously the GPS/positioning/map application.

This law has been coming for a long time, I just read in either the WSJ or NYT that it did go into effect. So what's the big secret?

(Yes, GPS works everywhere in the world, BTW, except in places where the US deems it necessary to degrade performance for security reasons.)

December 18 2007 at 12:18 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
occitan

Working on adding a bluetooth stack would be more useful than hacking a bluetooth dongle, there are tons of bluetooth GPS receivers out there....

December 17 2007 at 7:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to occitan's comment
leonowski

Agreed. We need more bluetooth profiles! The iPhone has the potential of becoming SO_MUCH_MORE. Imagine profiles like A2DP and SPP running on your iPhone. Without more profiles for the stack, touting Bluetooth features for the iPhone is pointless. Who cares about Bluetooth when you can only run the headset profile?

December 17 2007 at 10:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Fritz Laurel

Cool proof of concept, but it looks like they've got a long way to go before they have a usable product.

First of all, they need to enclose that thing in a box and do something else with those flashing lights. What if I glanced away for a split second and missed the light flash and now it's 5 mins later and I'm all like "WTF, why won't this thing acquire the freaking sat?!"

And then they'll have to wait for the SDK in order to have better integration with things like google maps so it updates your location as you drive.

But, I already have a SatNav unit in my car. The killer feature for this, though, is if/when that google maps integration DOES happen and they work it in with the traffic data google maps offers and it alters your route accordingly (which my 2004 SatNav doesn't do but I know other units do). Now, that would be useful!

December 17 2007 at 4:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dave

On second thought - has anyone hooked up a bluetooth GPS unit to the iPhone?

I'm not saying Dongles are bad - they are quite good. Lower battery needs (as in all from one set of batts, no transmitter), lower cost, but is anyone working with GPS on the iPhone already? iPhone cam + camera + geotag = urban planner technobliss.

December 17 2007 at 3:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Dave's comment
jtd

The iPhone has no Bluetooth stack. It cannot connect via BT to anything other than a headset.

December 17 2007 at 7:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
basscadet

nice going for those guys and if they managed to do all that bypassing barriers, it will be a lot easier to update it once the SDK comes out. Unless that same SDK is horribly delayed or includes so many limitations that it is rendered useless for proper application development.

December 17 2007 at 2:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.