In what must surely come as a huge relief to both people with pacemakers and iPods everywhere, the Food and Drug Administration recently released a report confirming that iPods do not, in fact, interfere with the function of pacemakers. According to an article over at Ars Technica, the report was issued following a study by the FDA which concluded that "no interference effects can occur" when an iPod is in proximity to a pacemaker.The FDA decided to conduct this new investigation and release the subsequent report after a student, 17-year old Jay Thaker, conducted his own study of 100 pacemaker-using patients as part of a school science project and concluded that iPods did interfere with pacemakers. In his report, Thaker stated that iPods "can cause cardiac implantable pacemakers to malfunction by interfering with the electromagnetic equipment monitoring the heart."
Fortunately, at least according to the newly released FDA report, Thaker's conclusions appear to be unfounded. So, for those keeping score at home, that's a large, well-funded federal agency with lots of highly-trained and experienced medical personnel, one, 17-year old student with no experience or medical training of any kind, zero. I know, try to contain your surprise. You may now go back to blissfully enjoying your iPods.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-03-2008 @ 8:45AM
Edsel said...
The iPod is my pacemaker.
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 10:43AM
zmf001 said...
Why did the FDA take so much time figuring this out? Doesn't the FCC tests required limits on EMI anyway?
I am just happy to see the FDA do something to help out a corporation, other than a medical or drug company.
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 10:55AM
Brian Ward said...
Not that I think the iPod really interferes with pacemakers (though I'm still not willing to rule that out in the case of the iPod Touch's wifi features), but making the argument that the FDA is correct simply because the it is a large well-funded federal agency is a logical fallacy.
That said: I love my iPod and I really, really want to get an iPhone, but I'm waiting until the 2nd (or 3rd) generation.
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 10:55AM
Dave Barnes said...
I prefer the article title at The Inquirer: "Ipods will not kill you"
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 1:49PM
Barry said...
I know Jay Thaker (the student who did the original study) and I can tell you that it wasn't just him in his basement or something.
He was doing his research at Michigan State University, in a lab with trained scientists and in a controlled environment.
Please look into the actual study and the way it was performed before ripping into an incredibly inteligent student who was doing legitimate research, whether he was 17 or 70.
Reply
2-04-2008 @ 10:13AM
mentalsticks said...
Agreed. A very irritating tone of voice in this article.
2-04-2008 @ 1:38PM
Paul said...
Agreed... I can't stand the quality of some of the 'journalism' this website accepts. It would be nice if the authors didn't just throw their opinions in your face, rather, they took the time to write from an impartial, un-biased standpoint.
I find the tone in which this article was written, very off putting.
2-03-2008 @ 2:35PM
phil said...
i say the kid was right! FDA is evil
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 2:48PM
harrywolf said...
Hold the front page. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 11:21PM
Stiv said...
Dude, why you gotta be hating on a 17 year old who's engaged with Science? Maybe you should go shove him into a locker...
Reply
2-04-2008 @ 2:12AM
news-spider said...
But the results apply ONLY to ipods. How about the hordes of inexpensively-produced flash-disk type MP3 players out there? They are as many as, if not more in number than iPods. What if they prove to be even more suspect?
child care and cardiac health
Reply