Filed under: Software
BusySync 2.0 Public Beta
The BusySync 2.0 public beta is now open. We've blogged about BusySync 2.0 before (and we even managed to snag an interview with the developer during Macworld this year), so no doubt you are aware of the big ticket item: bidirectional syncing between iCal and Google Calendar.
When BusySync 2.0 leaves beta it will cost $24.95, which is a $5 increase to the price, however, if you buy it now you get the old $19.95 price (and users of BusySync 1.5 get the upgrade for free).
Thanks, Benni.
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Kwahnoom said 10:11AM on 3-05-2008
Could you please do a Spanning Sync vs. BusySync comparison (how they work, how well they work, etc.)? I currently have one-year subscription to Spanning Sync, but if BusySync works well with syncing gCal, then I'd rather pay the one-time software price than subscribing to the Spanning Sync service.
Reply
Michael Rose said 11:17AM on 3-05-2008
We'll see what we can do about a sync 'bakeoff.'
chiefmoamba said 10:28AM on 3-05-2008
What does BusySync offer above SpanningSync?
Reply
Michael said 10:30AM on 3-05-2008
I'm dying for Google Calendar iPhone over the air synchronization!!
Reply
tim said 10:38AM on 3-05-2008
i sent this in weeks ago when it was first release and you guys didnt post it.... along with all the other things i sent in. great work... couldve had this up here when it FIRST came out.
Reply
Big John said 11:01AM on 3-05-2008
No one cares. Seriously. They saw it, liked it and held onto it until they needed something to post.
Michael Rose said 11:17AM on 3-05-2008
Tim, the beta wasn't officially released for public consumption until today. The developer asked us not to post anything until it was ready for prime time. Thanks for the tip!
Whiplash said 10:52AM on 3-05-2008
What we need is ADDRESS BOOK syncing!
Reply
Spaz said 12:08PM on 3-05-2008
Which address book are you referring to? OSX, Google, Outlook Contacts, etc...
Whiplash said 12:39PM on 3-05-2008
Between Apple's Address book and Google's contacts.
jrflesch said 10:57AM on 3-05-2008
I agree with the above. We need a comparison on here between Busysync and Spanningsync. I need one of the two for work, but of course i want the best one!!!
Which is the best Scott???
Also, Michael is right on with an iphone/gcal sync. Crackberry has it! Where is it for iphone. I understand that it requires native sw, so perhaps this will come shortly after the SDK (tomorrow). Which is almost 9 months too late for such a peice of sw!
Reply
Wayne Pascoe said 11:05AM on 3-05-2008
Why do we call it bidirectional syncing ? Surely by the very definition, synchronisation HAS to be bidirectional ? Anything else is just a feed / dump of the data.
Reply
Lummox said 11:40AM on 3-05-2008
Semantic differences.
A feed/data dump implies you are taking the data from source A and overwriting anything in source B.
One way sync implies that source A is the master, source B is the receiver, and any changes made in source A will be reflected in source B, but changes/additions made in source B will be kept, but not reflected in source A. If both source A and B make a change to the same record, you have a conflict you need to resolve (unless source A always overwrites, then yes, this would be similar to a dump).
Bidrectional sync implies that any changes in either source will be reflected in the other, conflicts aside.
Glen said 11:10AM on 3-05-2008
I've used (and paid for) both Spanning Sync and BusySync. Some info may have changed since my experience. YMMV.
My comparison:
Spanning Sync: $25 per year or $65 "lifetime", goes through their servers to sync, so a third party has access to your data.
BusySync: $20 now or $25 after the 2.0 release. Doesn't require a third party server.
My opinion: I used Spanning Sync first and wasn't pleased with it. I deleted it before my subscription was up and did without. I bought BusySync last month based on the reviews of what v2.0 would offer. I've been using the beta and it works for me. Bi-directional sync, I'm not getting duplicate entries, fits into the "just works" schema just fine.
Reply
jrflesch said 11:20AM on 3-05-2008
Glen, do you by chance have an iPhone, if so, what are your thoughts about that syncing process between the phone, ical and then gcal???
Glen said 11:34AM on 3-05-2008
@jrflesch: No iPhone but a Windows smartphone (it's a work thing, not my choice). iCal and gCal sync automatically with BusySync, then when home I run Missing Sync to sync contacts and calendars with the phone. Because it's Windows and doesn't organize things the same way as the other apps, I only sync from iCal to the phone. Check out the BusySync website, they have graphics to explain why "circular" syncing isn't recommended. To make matters worse, I have a work calendar thorough Exchange. That syncs to gCal, which I then do an over-the-air sync with gCal of just that calendar. Confused yet? I also share the gCal calendars with my wife, who syncs to Outlook on her PC and smartphone.
Roye said 2:10PM on 3-05-2008
@jrflesch: I use it with an iPhone and it works great. When I schedule something on the iPhone, it places the appointment on the default calendar in iCal, which is the same default calendar in gCal. But this isn't a BusySync issue. I just update my entries when I sync to place them on the proper calendar. New entries into gCal magically appear in iCal and the iPhone when the sync runs (q 5 minutes). Totally worth the $20, and it does SSL so the fuzz won't know about your dentist appointment.
jonathansmith68 said 11:38AM on 3-05-2008
I blogged about my great experience with BusySync 2.0beta about a week ago. My review is pretty biased since I haven't used any of the other offerings. I was in the same position as a lot of you, was trying to stick it out and wait until there was a really good comparison post comparing gSync, Spanning Sync and BusySync. But basically what I experienced was a great set-and-forget-it solution that "just works."
http://jonathansmith68.blogspot.com/2008/02/bi-directional-ical-and-googlecal-sync.html
Reply
El Cartel said 11:46AM on 3-05-2008
Quick question I installed spanning sync then uninstalled because it did not work for me, but I still have the spanning sync icon on the top. How do I remove that? thannk in advance.
Reply
Big John said 12:02PM on 3-05-2008
Reinstall it, grab an application like AppDelete or AppZapper and uninstall Spanning Sync that way. Does a great job of smoking any remains of a program. I had a similar issue last year and this combination worked for me.