Quickertek has produced an antenna for the Time Capsule which, according to them, increases the device's range by 50%. It's compatible with 802.11 A, B, and G, and comes either as a self install kit or an installation service. Or, if you don't have a Time Capsule just yet, you can order one from Quickertek with the antenna pre-installed. It comes with a good amount of cable so you can spend your weekend obsessively placing and replacing it in your home until it's just right. So that will be fun.
The 500GB self-install kit is $129.95US, and the service is $200US. Prices are the same for the 1TB version kit and service. If you want to do it all in one fell swoop, you can order a 500GB Time Capsule + pre-installed kit for $500US, or $700US for the 1TB version.
[Via Engadget]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-25-2008 @ 10:49PM
Kuy said...
Tri-band? 2.45Ghz, 5.8GHz and... what?
Don't they mean tri-_antenna_, as in MIMO?
-Kuy
Reply
3-25-2008 @ 10:51PM
Kuy said...
... as if Wi-Fi wasn't confusing enough for the average consumer. 802.11 a, b and g aren't bands.
3-26-2008 @ 12:08AM
starwxrwx said...
don't you really need 802.11n for Time Capsule, since transferring a lot over even 802.11g is pretty slow? I guess if you have an older mac you have no choice, but I'd think to use it you would want n (or pre-n or whatever they are calling it now)
Reply
3-26-2008 @ 8:25AM
jus10 said...
Well, my TC is n/g compatible for my ipod Touch to work. My Mac has all the bandwidth the cat6 cable can give it so it really isn't a problem.
Even if I disconnected the cable and put the Macbook on the TC at g speeds, there isn't a lot of data backed up every hour. After the first "big" backup is done, most of the other ones are only a couple hundred meg if that.
Also, I've never had any problems with TC's range and I'm still using the ultra-crowded 2.4GHZ range. I imagine if I kicked it into 5GHZ n-only the thing would fly.
3-26-2008 @ 1:26AM
atuck said...
So I can drop 129 bucks in order to install an antenna that doesn't even boost an 802.11n signal? Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeak. Whats the point in even picking up time capsule if you are using a, b or even g when it comes to large file transfers?
Reply
3-26-2008 @ 1:40AM
Alan said...
Why should you have yo pay for an extra antenna? Shouldn't Apple make the antenna built into the Time Capsule good enough?
Reply
3-26-2008 @ 12:47PM
MacBookOwner said...
Christ, can't have ONE 3rd party Apple product mentioned without someone whining with the "Why can't Apple just make it good enough so it doesn't need it" question.
3-26-2008 @ 12:01PM
ZeroCorpse said...
It IS good enough-- It's just that some people can't leave well enough alone and have to "mod" everything they touch. Unless you're trying to make it work in a lead house, you should be fine with most 802.11n networks.
Maybe if you were trying to boost signal for an office block, you'd need this. Otherwise, it's just a FUD device for the people who always have to eke every ounce of power out of their devices.
It's the same people who mod their TV and jailbreak their iPod touch. They're just used to the PC world where everything HAS to be modified in order to be useful.
Reply
3-26-2008 @ 4:11PM
Robert Nienburg said...
I've never lived in the PC world, and I still think everything has to be modded.
3-26-2008 @ 12:12PM
Ryan said...
OR.. I can buy a 99$ airport express and bridge my network without paying their nutty price and getting more features.
Reply
3-26-2008 @ 12:24PM
Fritz Laurel said...
Great idea, but I don't remember hearing the range of a TC being an issue...
Reply
3-27-2008 @ 9:26AM
RobK said...
Most WiFi antennas are useless and actually DECREASE the performance of the built in antenna. Why? Well any gains created by the antenna itself are offset by the loss in the cable itself.
At 2.6 Ghz and higher there is a LOT of loss even in a short run of cable especially the poor quality THIN cable often used in these wifi antennas.
My advice. Don't waste your money on these antennas. If you do get one, replace the cable with a good quality low loss cable. (But note that even a short run of a good quality low loss cable can be pricey!)
Reply
4-06-2008 @ 5:35AM
kleinias said...
.
Reply
4-24-2008 @ 12:33AM
jgo said...
I searched the net for a real review of this product and did not find one. So I took a chance. I purchased the same antenna array as this, but labeled for AEBS.
Simply put: with the quickertek array installed there was no increase in range. No improvement AT ALL.
I wish I had thought to instead buy an Airport Express which is cheaper and WILL extend my network. Now I am less $129 and my only option (per Quickertek policy) is to return the product for store credit.
Reply