Filed under: Features, Troubleshooting, Ask TUAW
Ask TUAW: Anti-virus, upgrading RAM, syncing computers, backup, file management and more
This time in Ask TUAW we have questions on Mac anti-virus options, upgrading RAM in a white iMac, syncing a laptop and a desktop, emulating Windows file management and more.As always, your suggestions are most welcome, and questions for next week should be left in the comments. When asking a question please include which machine you're running and which version of Mac OS X, as certain answers will vary between different Macs and Tiger vs. Leopard, etc. (we'll assume you're running Leopard if you don't specify). And now, on to the questions!
Brassen asks
I'm on a MacBook (last gen, black) running Leopard 10.5.4. Can you indicate a good antivirus for me? If possible a free one. I've read about ClamAV but it hasn't been updated in a while.
The only two free options I know about are ClamAV and iAntiVirus (though business use and/or support costs $29.95). Your best bet is probably VirusBarrier X5 ($69.95) from Intego, which is recommended by Macworld.
Personally, I run (and have had reasonably good luck with) Sophos, which I get free from my university. If you're part of a large company or university you may be able to get Sophos, which is generally marketed to Enterprise users (although there is a small business product line).
Tomahawk asks
I have the white 24" Intel iMac, and I have been looking at upgrading the RAM to its max and I'm not sure what would be the recommended configuration to get the maximum performance. I know that I can put two paired 2GB sticks in the slots, but it is my understanding that the motherboard can only address up to 3GB total (is there a way to change this? firmware update maybe?), and I can't buy two 1.5GB paired since such a thing doesn't exist. Should I just get 1 - 1GB and 1 - 2GB and call it a day or do you think I should do the 2 - 2GB thing? What is different from the newer Aluminum iMac which allows up to 4GB, that wasn't present in the white iMac?
Unfortunately, the RAM limitation on your revision B iMac is built-in to the motherboard design, so there's not really anything you can do to get past it. Now to answer your question: you can get a little bit more RAM by doing two 2GB sticks rather than one 2GB and one 1GB. Check out this guide on Intel Mac RAM and you'll see that your motherboard can actually address 3.3GB, meaning that you'd get an extra 300MB of available RAM with the second 2GB stick plus a 6-8% performance bump from the Dual Channel performance.
So you will get something out of running two 2GB sticks, though if that's enough to matter depends on what you do with your Mac. If you're running Photoshop or other memory intensive applications, every little bit will help.
NeilS asks
I have an iPhone (1st gen), and a MacBook running Leopard. It surprised me to find recently that if I connect them over bluetooth, the iPhone doesn't list any services as available. Where I was hoping to reach was the ability to select a phone number in Mail, or a web browser, on my Mac and "Dial from my iPhone" - which would instruct the iPhone to dial over bluetooth. (Otherwise, I just have to type the number in manually ... sigh ...) Sending SMSes from the desktop would be good, too! Is there any way to achieve this, either natively, or through third party apps?
BluePhoneElite 2 ($24.95) will apparently allow you to dial and receive calls, basically by turning your Mac into the equivalent of a huge Bluetooth headset. However, it will not allow you to send SMS messages over the iPhone nor am I aware of any other method for doing so. You'd think this would be a no-brainer for inclusion with Address Book, but that is unfortunately not the case. I hope you know, though, that you can send SMS messages on your Mac with iChat.
Jones asks
I just bought a second external hard drive to use for Time Machine. I would like to be able to use both of my drives to backup the same computer using TM. Is there a way to do this? (I am doing this just in case one of my drives dies at the same time as my computer. Better safe than sorry!)
If you'll allow me to make a suggestion, I would really recommend doing something different. Instead of trying to use both drives with Time Machine at the same time (which does not seem to be possible), instead I recommend using Time Machine with one drive and using the second drive to make a bootable clone backup (once or more per day) with SuperDuper! ($27.95), or Carbon Copy Cloner (donations requested) if you want a cheaper option.
If you do this you'll have the advantage of a double backup, plus you'll have much less downtime if a problem occurs on your main computer. With a bootable backup you can simply reboot the Mac off the second drive. If all you have is Time Machine backups you may face a much longer recovery operation to get going again.
Steve-o asks
MacBook pro running Leopard. Question about finder. I switched from a PC to a Mac at the release of Leopard and love it except for 1 annoying thing in finder. When I scroll down through a page of folders, sometimes I need to select a folder to view the contents and then "back out" to the page of folders again to look in other ones. However, on my Mac, no matter how far down I have scrolled to a particular folder, once I select one and then push the back arrow, it resets the prior page of folders all the way back to the top.... Not where I was at the selected folder. Windows not only brought me back to where I was, but also highlighted the folder that I just selected for reference. This becomes tremendously annoying when searching my iPhoto folders and the like with huge numbers of similarly named folders (one number differences). Is there a way to enable a placemarker or something so that it doesn't reset each time I go back a page?
As far as I know there is no way to do what you want with the Finder. I might suggest, however, that there are third-party file management applications out there that might be more congenial for you as a Switcher. For instance, if you're accustomed at all to the two-pane style of file manager you might like to check out ForkLift ($44.95) which in my limited testing does seem to function as you describe.
Update: Our commenters below have your solution: ⌘ + the up arrow.
Adam asks
I soon will be purchasing a new Mac and had a few questions about keeping my two Macs up to date with each other. Essentially one is going to stay at home all the time, the other will go to class with me. Is there a way to ensure specific folders/apps are synced to each other - preferably one that doesn't involve using the web (since I have a bandwidth limit at school) and is automatic? Essentially I want to ensure my "school work" folders are synced on both machines and that my apple mail is synced (ie the sent messages/inbox will be the same on both machines regardless of which was used to send/receive the messages).
We've addressed this type of question before, but with back-to-school time upon us it might be good to revisit it. If you want to keep two folders on two Macs in sync you'll need some kind of third-party software. There are two that I regularly recommend for this ChronoSync ($30) and Martian Slingshot ($29.99). Either can be set up to do what you want, with ChronoSync perhaps a bit more powerful, but Martian Slingshot perhaps a bit easier to use.
As for keeping email in sync, it's best to do that server-side. If you just set up both Macs to use IMAP in Mail.app your email will be essentially automatically in sync. Your school will most likely support IMAP, but you can also use Gmail in this way for free.
Get a WordPress.com Blog
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
sky_guy said 8:34AM on 8-23-2008
@Steve-o:if you use CMD+"up-arrow", you will go to the parent folder with the folder you just visited highlighted. As you wished. CMD+"down-arrow" lets you dive back into that highlighted folder
Reply
Fritz Laurel said 2:12PM on 8-23-2008
And if you hold the option key while you do it, it'll close the current window first and then open the window w/ the parent folder.
Ali Rantakari said 10:49AM on 8-24-2008
Cmd+up is handy when your hands are already on the keyboard, but for those times when you prefer to just mouse around, you can use this simple AppleScript app I made as a toolbar button for Finder for this exact same purpose: http://hasseg.org/blog/?p=114
SCOTT said 3:11AM on 9-27-2008
OH MY GOD I LOVE THAT APPLE SCRIPT
JUST WENT TO THE LINK AND DOWNLOADED THE PROGRAM HE MADE...AND JUST DRUG THAT PROGRAM TO THE FINDER TOOLBAR...AND LIKE MAGIC THERE WAS A UP ARROW AND IT WORKS LIKE A CHARM...DONT KNOW HOW MANY TIMES I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR SOMETHING IN THOSE FILES THAT JUST HAVE A DATE AFTER DATE AFTER DATE LOOKING FOR THE RIGHT FILE AND BACK AND FORTH...NIGHTMARE...THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THIS COMMENT POSTING...AND PLEASE DONT HOLD MY ALL CAPS AGAINST ME...I HANDWRITE IN ALL CAPS TOO...NO YELLING HERE...THANK YOU AGAIN
Andy Berdan said 8:40AM on 8-23-2008
In response to "steve-o", I suggest something that fits the core issue; that of returning to the parent folder once in a subfolder. You can use Cmd-Up to navigate back up to a parent folder, or you can Cmd-click (or right-click) on the folder icon in the Finder title bar to see the full folder breadcrumb trail at any time.
Reply
Andre said 8:50AM on 8-23-2008
There is a way to backtrack properly in Finder. Instead of using 'back', use Command-Up (as in cursor up). I have this assigned to the back-button on my mouse. This solves that really annoyance, and brings you back one level at a time, showing you the highlighted folder names along the way back.
The caveat is that it isn't a true 'back', it is an 'up'. That is, it negotiates upward in the directory structure, so if you have been bouncing around different folders, it won't truly go back to where you have been. It works well for browsing your structure of photo folders though.
Reply
RobK said 9:54AM on 8-23-2008
Andre wrote: "I have this assigned to the back-button on my mouse."
How do you do this?
Andre said 10:44AM on 8-23-2008
Sorry, I use a Microsoft mouse with their software. I can customize any button.
AJ said 8:56AM on 8-23-2008
Is there any limitation to Hard Drive size for the current generation iMac's? I see that Seagate will be releasing the 1.5TB drives in the next few weeks and was looking to upgrade my internal drive. I do not want to go the external route.
Reply
Andre said 8:58AM on 8-23-2008
To answer Jones, you could create a mirrored RAID set in Disk Utility from your two external drives, then instruct Time Machine to use the mirror. This would give you the redundancy you are looking for.
It is also my understanding that a Time Machine backup _is_ bootable, so it could be recovered from easily.
Reply
RobK said 10:00AM on 8-23-2008
Yes, you can use RAID to make the two drives look just like one for TM. But RAID has one BIG drawback. It doubles the odds of failure of your backup. If any one of the drives in your RAID fails, your backup is lost.
Given the costs of drives these days, I would just go out and buy one BIG drive for TM.
Andre said 10:43AM on 8-23-2008
Not true with a mirror. If it's a strip set yes, then you're screwed with any failure. With a mirror set you can lose an entire drive and you still have the other copy (that's the whole purpose of mirroring!).
ball said 11:05AM on 8-23-2008
@RobK
There are multiple flavors of RAID, and it seems like you are conflating Andre's suggested mirroring scheme (RAID 1) with RAID striping (RAID 0). You can read all about it over at the wikipedia article by searching for "standard raid levels."
Andre's RAID 1 suggestion was the first thing that came to my mind. Though I haven't tried setting up Time Machine to backup to a RAID disk set, it seems like it should work as intended. The primary use of a mirrored RAID setup is to provide data redundancy in the event that one of the two drives fails.
Mat Lu said 12:11PM on 8-23-2008
No, a Time Machine backup is NOT bootable. You can recover with a Leopard Install disc, but you cannot simply boot off of the Time Machine disk. It is possible to use SuperDuper! to make your Time Machine volume bootable, but you can't do it without third-party software.
eric f. said 1:55PM on 8-24-2008
Yes, a RAID is most certainly compatible with Time Machine.
While I don't use a mirror, I am using a Striped RAID as my TM backup, because I have so much data and lacked a single HDD that could hold it all. Besides doubling my storage capacity, The striped RAID also speeds up the backup process with faster writing.
kris said 9:34AM on 8-23-2008
@Andre: as i understand it (as i haven't had to restore yet), TM backups are NOT bootable as a standalone. you can choose the option in leopard to restore FROM a TM backup (using the leopard disk), but not the way you'd be able to with superduper.
Reply
Andre said 10:46AM on 8-23-2008
You're right, that's how I did it. It's been a while!
kevin said 9:51AM on 8-23-2008
time machine backups NOT bootabe. I had to recover once using it and with approximately 80 GB used it took about 3 hours to restore (USB 2.0 external drive). )
Reply
Brian Puccio said 10:12AM on 8-23-2008
I've been using unison to ensure that my home directories stay synced between two Macs.
http://brianpuccio.net/syncing_two_macs_without_mac_or_mobileme
Reply
Dave Barnes said 10:15AM on 8-23-2008
Regarding Tomahawk's question about RAM.
Buy 2x2GB SODIMMs.
The cost delta between 3 and 4 GB is so small that it is not worth worrying about. It is $20 from MacSales.com and you do get a useful 0.3GB for that.
Reply