Skip to Content

Sun xVM VirtualBox 2 enhances the free virtualization experience

xVM Virtual BoxSun xVM VirtualBox 2.0 has arrived! We did a detailed review of VirtualBox 1.6 back in July, and now a shiny new version is available. If you want to set up a virtualization environment on your Intel Mac, but don't want to spend money on Parallels or VMWare Fusion, xVM VirtualBox 2.0 is a free and full-featured package that may fit your needs very well.

What's new in version 2.0? Mac users will see the following changes:
  • 64-bit OS guest support (only on 64-bit hosts, as one might expect)
  • New native Leopard user interface on Mac OS X hosts
  • New-version notifier
  • Guest property information interface
  • Host Interface Networking on Mac OS X hosts
  • Framework for collecting performance and resource usage data (metrics)
  • Added SATA asynchronous IO (NCQ: Native Command Queuing) when accessing raw disks/partitions (major performance gain)
A list of bug fixes can be viewed after the break. xVM VirtualBox 2.0 can be downloaded here.

Some bugs in earlier versions were squashed as well:
  • VMM: VT-x fixes
  • AHCI/SATA: improved performance
  • GUI: keyboard fixes
  • Network: added support for jumbo frames (> 1536 bytes)
  • Shared Folders: fixed guest crash with Windows Media Player 11
  • Mac OS X: Ctrl+Left mouse click doesn't simulate a right mouse click in the guest anymore. Use Hostkey+Left for a right mouse click emulation.


Sun xVM VirtualBox 2.0 has arrived! We did a detailed review of VirtualBox 1.6 back in July, and now a shiny new version is available. If...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

21 Comments

Filter by:
kininn

I have a PowerMac 2.1GHz G5. Does VirtualBox 2 require Intel ONLY? and: Which version of Windows XP would I need if I didn't want to spend a lot of money?

September 16 2008 at 5:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
marc cardwell

if i just wanted to play around w/ this VM, and not spend anything on another OS, AND wanted the install to be super easy, what OS options do i have?

i'd just be dicking around w/ this...

September 04 2008 at 4:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to marc cardwell's comment
lakiolen

You've got Linux distros, at the least.

September 04 2008 at 6:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ajk

Try open solaris if you are tired of linux and bsd.

September 05 2008 at 12:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tdskate

This may be a dumb question, but aren't all intel-macs 64bit processors?

September 04 2008 at 3:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to tdskate's comment
Zimmie

Nope. The original Core Duo and Core Solo machines are 32-bit with Physical Address Extension.

September 04 2008 at 3:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
lakiolen

The processors might be 64bit (which not all are) but the OS isn't completely 64 bit. Snow Leopard will be though.

September 04 2008 at 6:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Alex

I just saw this post RIGHT AFTER the post about a system monitor app that the author is charging $30 for.

This might be a chance that those who don't understand the concept of free software (as in beer, even) might get enlightened here.

Let's see. A software that allows you to run another OS simultaniously and flawlessly on your Mac that is free, vs. a system monitor or various other gimmicks (not implying that system monitor is a gimmick but a lot of these softwares that charge money just do one small function for $30-$50.).

Just had to say that. Nice to see that someone is providing free virtualization, no slash that, free software period, for the Mac :)

I commend Sun for this, but Sun is no stranger to providing free stuff (ahem Java)

September 04 2008 at 2:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ryan Trevisol

Seems pretty solid, I'm giving it a try. Free is always nice. If it runs more smoothly than VMWare, they might have a convert in me.

September 04 2008 at 1:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael

Note that the "64-bit OS guest support (only on 64-bit hosts, as one might expect)" commentary is somewhat misguided.

VMWare server supports 64-bit guest operating systems with VMWare running on 32-bit hardware. Not sure about VMWare fusion since I haven't tried a 64-bit on any of the few 32-bit only intel Macs.

September 04 2008 at 1:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Michael's comment
Zimmie

No, it most certainly does *not* support 64-bit guests on 32-bit hardware. What it supports is 64-bit guests on 32-bit host operating systems running on 64-bit hardware. For example, the Core 2 Duo is a 64-bit processor, but it can run 32-bit code natively, so you can install the 32-bit version of Windows on it. You can then install VMware and run Windows xp x64 in a VM. The original Core Duo is a 32-bit processor. VMware will not allow you to run a 64-bit guest on one.

The way it does this involves using Intel's VT or AMD's AMD-V to give the guest slightly more direct access to the hardware than it would otherwise get.

September 04 2008 at 3:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
JoshK

I had trouble getting it set up, it needs to be easy as VMWare Fusion. I gave up on this free piece of crap and just went VMWare and haven't had one single regret.

September 04 2008 at 1:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Fourex

It runs really well. But, I can't get any sound out of any of my virtual machines. I have both WinXP and Ubuntu running. I wish I had sound; but I can't find help anywhere for it.

September 04 2008 at 1:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Fourex's comment
Syaman

To get sound to work, you have to go into the virtual machine's setting and tick Enable Audio. Host Audio Driver = CoreAudio and Audio Controller=ICH AC97 gives me sound in linux

September 06 2008 at 10:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jonico

Not at home to test it out, can somebody share some screenshots of the the new interface. I would really appreciate it.

September 04 2008 at 12:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joshua Ochs

Don't believe the bits about a "native" interface - it's anything but, and shows. Looking inside the application bundle, QT is still sitting there. Even besides that, a lot of the little details are not up to Mac interface standards for fit and finish (menu structure is spartan at best, main settings window lacks polish).

Oh, and it doesn't help that moving the application anywhere but "/Applications" results in it failing to launch completely. The console just gets messages like:

"9/4/08 11:26:23 AM [0x0-0x6f46f4].org.virtualbox.app.VirtualBoxVM[12841] com.apple.console VirtualBox: supR3HardenedVerifyDir: Failed to open "/Applications/VirtualBox.app/Contents/MacOS": No such file or directory (2) "

Whatever "supR3HardenedVerifyDir" is, it needs to loosen up. Like many others I suspect, I have far too many applications to just dump them all in one big folder.

September 04 2008 at 12:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.