Filed under: Enterprise, Software, Universal Binary
VMWare Fusion 2.0 is released
Great news for any virtualization junkies out there (I know I'm not the only one). VMWare Fusion 2.0 [Note: VMware's product manager told us an official announcement time of 12:01am Tuesday morning, EDT; however the final version of Fusion 2.0 has not appeared on VMware's website yet as of 12:45am, as pointed out by Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch. –Ed. Update: as of 1 am EDT, the Fusion page has been revised to include the 2.0 upgrade information. –Ed.]
I've been using Fusion 2.0 since it first entered beta during the summer and have been very impressed with its performance and feature set. In addition to TUAW, I also write for Download Squad, where we've been a little bit Chrome-Crazy for the last couple of weeks. Although I have access to a few Windows machines, because all my tools for writing and screenshots and graphics are on my Mac, I've been using the beta and release candidate versions of VMWare Fusion 2.0 for all of my testing.
Fusion 2.0 features lots of improvements and new features, but the most significant feature, from a technology-pushing perspective, is probably the ability to run Leopard Server as a virtual machine. When Apple made the decision to allow for server virtualization right after Leopard's release, both VMWare and Parallels announced plans to integrate that feature into their respective products. Parallels released Parallels Server back in June, targeting the higher-end enterprise market. VMWare decided to include the feature in Fusion 2.0 to give consumers a taste of the good life.
Although my year-old MacBook isn't really the ideal platform to run a virtual instance of Leopard Server, I did give it a go with one of the RC releases and was pleasantly surprised to find I could run a stable local MAMP server off it, and it withstood a pounding from my boyfriend's MacBook and the other media computers we have scattered around our apartment. On a loaded iMac or Mac Pro, I could see Fusion being very handy for testing or replicating a production environment.
Another new feature to Fusion 2.0, which first appeared in one of the release candidates, is a 1-year subscription to McAfee VirusScan Plus. Although I personally prefer NOD32 for Windows anti-virus protection, having anti-virus software already built into the virtual machine is a great step, especially for users who might be new to virtualization and/or the Mac. There is no longer an excuse to not have some sort of protection on your Windows installs.
VMWare Fusion 2.0 is $79.99 for new users, and free for existing customers. VMWare offers a 30-day free trial, if you want to try it out before buying. You need an Intel Mac running OS X 10.4 or higher. Like all virtualization products, the more RAM you have in your machine, the easier things will go.

![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
saycarramrod said 12:22AM on 9-16-2008
"Withstood a pounding"...heehee
Reply
Andy said 10:49AM on 9-16-2008
Are you 12?
John M said 12:24AM on 9-16-2008
Errr... Where is the fusion 2.0 download? All I see is 2.0rc1
Reply
Ryan Schmidt said 12:24AM on 9-16-2008
Yea, I don't see 2.0 anywhere. 1.1.3 is all I can find.
Reply
emax said 12:29AM on 9-16-2008
yeah.....where is it? they are still advertising 1.1.3 as the latest version....
Reply
Matt Schinckel said 12:38AM on 9-16-2008
It seems to me that 2.0 is still only in beta. That's what the website is telling me!
Reply
fishbert said 12:53AM on 9-16-2008
To download, go to the downloads page and copy the link for the 1.0 release. Then, replace "-10" at the end of the URL with "-200", and you'll get the 2.0 release.
Or, just go here:
http://www.vmware.com/download/download.do?downloadGroup=FUS-200
Reply
Merlyn3D said 12:53AM on 9-16-2008
http://www.vmware.com/download/download.do?downloadGroup=FUS-200
That's the download link it seems.
Reply
fishbert said 12:58AM on 9-16-2008
I win. =)
Xybr said 12:54AM on 9-16-2008
Just checked the website and VMware Fusion 2.0 is out. I'm downloading it now. :D
Reply
Ben G. said 12:56AM on 9-16-2008
Sorry for the delay, folks. VMware Fusion 2.0's web pages were a little late in getting up, but everything's up now!
The links in the article should now work just fine (I checked 'em myself.)
Reply
Joshua Ochs said 12:57AM on 9-16-2008
It appears to be up now. Downloading it as we speak, and the build number matches the final release.
Reply
JKT said 1:01AM on 9-16-2008
Can someone point to a good, feature-by-feature comparison between Parallels and Fusion? I've been using Parallels for a while and wonder in what ways it's better or worse than the alternative. Thanks!
Reply
Joseph said 1:18AM on 9-16-2008
fusion doesn't hog resources.
fusion doesn't bring the curtain of death because of RAM management.
nuff said.
KarlW said 1:29AM on 9-16-2008
Has anybody tried installing Leopard Client in Server mode? I'd like another installation to test on, and this would be an ideal solution.
Reply
Raphael said 1:45AM on 9-16-2008
Don't bother. I just downloaded and installed it, 'upgraded' my virtual machine, let it go through and re-discover all the devices, and then ran a benchmark in Matlab.
The verdict: VMware 2.0 runs 50% slower than VMware 1.1.3.
It seems that they've been emulating windows for so long they've picked up some nasty windows traits :)
Reply
duro said 2:22AM on 9-16-2008
yeah i couldnt help but laugh at the 'withstood a pounding" line either...
Reply
Jash Sayani said 5:17AM on 9-16-2008
Hows this better than Sun VirtualBox 2.0 ?
Reply
Christina Warren said 6:26AM on 9-16-2008
Last time I tried Virtual Box, it didn't have USB support (which is an immediate fail for me because I typically run my VMs off of an external hard drive) and couldn't operate in Bridge mode. But if you are just wanting to run one or two programs, and you don't have any graphical desires (Fusion 2.0 is considerably better with video playback -- I can actually watch Amazon Unbox stuff now), the fact that it is free is great.
One big advantage of Parallels/Fusion: if you set up a Boot Camp partition, which is what I used to do (I honestly don't have the need anymore), you can use that partition as our VM, inside the OS X environment -- which makes it awesome if you DO want to start up in Windows "natively."
EMoShunz said 9:05AM on 9-16-2008
Anyone know if 2.0 supports OpenGL 3D acceleration? I'd love to give a fully supported KDE 4.1 desktop a try in VMware, eye candy and all.
Reply