Skip to Content

VMWare Fusion 2.0 is released

Great news for any virtualization junkies out there (I know I'm not the only one). VMWare Fusion 2.0 has just been will be released Tuesday! Fusion 2.0 is a free upgrade for all existing 1.x customers, and it adds more than 100 new features and enhancements.

[Note: VMware's product manager told us an official announcement time of 12:01am Tuesday morning, EDT; however the final version of Fusion 2.0 has not appeared on VMware's website yet as of 12:45am, as pointed out by Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch. –Ed. Update: as of 1 am EDT, the Fusion page has been revised to include the 2.0 upgrade information. –Ed.]

I've been using Fusion 2.0 since it first entered beta during the summer and have been very impressed with its performance and feature set. In addition to TUAW, I also write for Download Squad, where we've been a little bit Chrome-Crazy for the last couple of weeks. Although I have access to a few Windows machines, because all my tools for writing and screenshots and graphics are on my Mac, I've been using the beta and release candidate versions of VMWare Fusion 2.0 for all of my testing.

Fusion 2.0 features lots of improvements and new features, but the most significant feature, from a technology-pushing perspective, is probably the ability to run Leopard Server as a virtual machine. When Apple made the decision to allow for server virtualization right after Leopard's release, both VMWare and Parallels announced plans to integrate that feature into their respective products. Parallels released Parallels Server back in June, targeting the higher-end enterprise market. VMWare decided to include the feature in Fusion 2.0 to give consumers a taste of the good life.

Although my year-old MacBook isn't really the ideal platform to run a virtual instance of Leopard Server, I did give it a go with one of the RC releases and was pleasantly surprised to find I could run a stable local MAMP server off it, and it withstood a pounding from my boyfriend's MacBook and the other media computers we have scattered around our apartment. On a loaded iMac or Mac Pro, I could see Fusion being very handy for testing or replicating a production environment.

Another new feature to Fusion 2.0, which first appeared in one of the release candidates, is a 1-year subscription to McAfee VirusScan Plus. Although I personally prefer NOD32 for Windows anti-virus protection, having anti-virus software already built into the virtual machine is a great step, especially for users who might be new to virtualization and/or the Mac. There is no longer an excuse to not have some sort of protection on your Windows installs.

VMWare Fusion 2.0 is $79.99 for new users, and free for existing customers. VMWare offers a 30-day free trial, if you want to try it out before buying. You need an Intel Mac running OS X 10.4 or higher. Like all virtualization products, the more RAM you have in your machine, the easier things will go.

Great news for any virtualization junkies out there (I know I'm not the only one). VMWare Fusion 2.0 has just been will be released...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

26 Comments

Filter by:
u07ch

4way smp is a great addition that was missed; at least for us Mac Pro owners

September 16 2008 at 3:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Greg Terry

Why waste your money. Check out Virtual Box at virtualbox.org It is free and works great!

September 16 2008 at 2:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike R

1. VMWare is slower with each release.
2. Bundling is bad. Especially anything from McAffee.
3. Virtual Box 2.0.2 from Sun is free. It has USB, bridging and is faster

September 16 2008 at 10:08 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
muddyh2o

now to wait for the new mac books pro to come out...

September 16 2008 at 9:22 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
EMoShunz

Anyone know if 2.0 supports OpenGL 3D acceleration? I'd love to give a fully supported KDE 4.1 desktop a try in VMware, eye candy and all.

September 16 2008 at 9:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to EMoShunz's comment
Ben G.

Fusion doesn't have built-in OpenGL acceleration, but Mac OS X's X11 does.

You can just ssh into your Linux VM from an xtern in X11 on your Mac (use the -Y argument to automatically forward X11 applications) and it'll automatically accelerate OpenGL applications.

September 16 2008 at 10:10 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
EMoShunz

i guess i sound smarter than i am when i say i want to test a linux distro. unfortunately, i have no idea how to do what you just said :(
i will do some googling though, thanks for pointing me in the right direction!

September 16 2008 at 10:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jash Sayani

Hows this better than Sun VirtualBox 2.0 ?

September 16 2008 at 5:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jash Sayani's comment
Christina Warren

Last time I tried Virtual Box, it didn't have USB support (which is an immediate fail for me because I typically run my VMs off of an external hard drive) and couldn't operate in Bridge mode. But if you are just wanting to run one or two programs, and you don't have any graphical desires (Fusion 2.0 is considerably better with video playback -- I can actually watch Amazon Unbox stuff now), the fact that it is free is great.

One big advantage of Parallels/Fusion: if you set up a Boot Camp partition, which is what I used to do (I honestly don't have the need anymore), you can use that partition as our VM, inside the OS X environment -- which makes it awesome if you DO want to start up in Windows "natively."

September 16 2008 at 6:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
duro

yeah i couldnt help but laugh at the 'withstood a pounding" line either...

September 16 2008 at 2:22 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Raphael

Don't bother. I just downloaded and installed it, 'upgraded' my virtual machine, let it go through and re-discover all the devices, and then ran a benchmark in Matlab.

The verdict: VMware 2.0 runs 50% slower than VMware 1.1.3.

It seems that they've been emulating windows for so long they've picked up some nasty windows traits :)

September 16 2008 at 1:45 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
KarlW

Has anybody tried installing Leopard Client in Server mode? I'd like another installation to test on, and this would be an ideal solution.

September 16 2008 at 1:29 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
JKT

Can someone point to a good, feature-by-feature comparison between Parallels and Fusion? I've been using Parallels for a while and wonder in what ways it's better or worse than the alternative. Thanks!

September 16 2008 at 1:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to JKT's comment
Joseph

fusion doesn't hog resources.
fusion doesn't bring the curtain of death because of RAM management.
nuff said.

September 16 2008 at 1:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.