Filed under: Odds and ends
MacTribe goes to print magazine format
Making the leap from online-only to print format, MacTribe has announced that it will begin publishing a magazine version. The site, and now the dead-tree edition, will continue to feature a mix of reviews and news along with "cultural and aesthetic" items sure to appeal to the sophisticated taste of Apple fans everywhere.We wish the MacTribe team the best of luck with their launch and look forward to seeing the results of their efforts on newsstands this month.
[via MacTech]

![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Pete said 11:12AM on 10-10-2008
I think that's great. I know it's nice to read things on the computer or iPhone, but I still enjoy kicking back with a good magazine on a hammock or on a plane.
Reply
Mike said 11:26AM on 10-10-2008
Exactly Pete, nothing beats an old fashion paper mag!
Greetz Mike - http://www.torrentfly.org
Reply
Hadrion said 12:18PM on 10-10-2008
Wow, boldy steppping into the 1800's...
Print is secondary to online these days. This seems very strange...
Reply
Bob S. said 1:22PM on 10-10-2008
I don't know why you think that; it isn't true. Maybe you don't read unless you're in front of a computer; I've worked in the magazine industry for 25 years, so I've got a little perspective. Right now the magazine format is much healthier than, say, the Reagan-era recession; the monthly magazine I work for (not in the computer field), over the six years I've been here, has finally leveled off at an audited circulation of well over 1.2 million, from somewhat under 800,000 in '02. So you're saying magazines are dead, and here we are jumping some 50% in about five years. Whom do I believe?
The trade sources I read show that every month, between eight and two dozen new magazines are launched -- that's eight to 24 new *regularly published* magazines *per month*, mind you, pretty contradictory to your claim -- and publishers of extant magazines are releasing more and more special issues and one-shots. Those are risky investments but pay off handsomely when they hit.
If all you read is computer magazines, your view might be skewed because so many of those are platform-dependent that as platforms come and go, so do the magazines. I've worked for computer magazines and won't get into that industry again. Those publishers *are* too slow to adapt.
That said, I wish MacTribe luck, but after watching MacAddict's slide into irrelevance and its transformation into the near-beer of computer magazines, I'll assume they're going to be among the two-thirds of magazine launches that don't make it five years. (That's a stat that long predates the Web, incidentally, and hasn't changed since it matured.) If they do survive, more power to 'em.
Hadrion said 1:39PM on 10-10-2008
You make good points. Perhaps I look at all print as the same, like newspapers, which are not doing well (the NYT now sees its print version as secondary to online), but thats *news*, magazines do contain a different kind of content... I was more specifically thinking about tech magazines, and it seems we mroe or less agree on that :)
Bob S. said 2:51PM on 10-10-2008
Yeah, fair enough -- and even I don't expect this utopia to last too much longer. The Kindle is the TRS-80 of ebook readers, but once there are decent (bright, thin, and sturdy) color displays and more reliable transfer methods, the print magazine format *is* going to take a good hit. We've been looking into PDF distribution for years, but none of those things are there yet, and it's still expensive and slow enough to distribute that it doesn't have a big advantage over print yet.
Alexander said 12:22PM on 10-10-2008
They should invest into a new logo. Reallyreally soon.
Reply