Filed under: Software, iTunes, Reviews, First Look
First Look: TuneUp for Mac now ready to tackle your iTunes disorganization
Despite the presence of a checkbox to "keep iTunes library organized" in the application's preferences, the fact remains that iTunes tracks -- coming from a plethora of sources and of varying vintage, and sometimes numbering in the thousands -- are a black hole of bad metadata. Track and performer names may be wrong or missing (the dreaded "Track 01" and my favorite band, Unknown Artist, are frequently seen); other details may be off-base, and as for album art... well, let's just say that I don't use Cover Flow that much, and not because I don't like the way it looks; it's just that the wide stretches of empty covers are depressing.
There's some help on the way from TuneUp; the formerly Windows-only iTunes companion is now available for the Mac, with a free version that 'cleans' up to 500 tracks and a paid/subscription Premium license ($19.95 onetime or $11.95/annual) with unlimited scrubbing bubble power.
I decided to give TuneUp a trial run on the most confused, mixed-up section of my iTunes library: a collection of professional and collegiate a cappella tracks, with track names identical to the original recordings, sure to befuddle any conventional artist matching strategy. Would TuneUp's leverage of the Gracenote database give it an advantage in dealing with these puzzlers? Read on for more, or check out our gallery of TuneUp screenshots.
Gallery: TuneUp for Mac
The first thing I noticed about the TuneUp plugin for iTunes is that it isn't. Isn't a plugin for iTunes, that is -- it's a separate application that 'side-hugs' the iTunes window, and tries to track with it as you resize, hide the Genius sidebar, etc. Most of the time it's not much of an issue, but you do notice the lag and redraw oddities when moving the iTunes window around, and it's a reminder that the integration between the two apps is less tight than it would be with a true plugin approach. There are other rough edges in the TuneUp 1.0 version, mostly annoying rather than serious; the one that kept me gritting my teeth was a persistent marble of doom that hung around long after the tool was done processing. You could click through it and keep working but it definitely was harshing my buzz.
TuneUp's concert search, video pane and cover art download features are nicely done (I especially liked the YouTube inset for selected songs), but the core of the app is the Cleaning. I dragged a cluster of 80 songs onto the Clean pane and let the tool start cranking away (it took several minutes for all the results to come in, which is normal). TuneUp broke the results into "Exact Match" and "Likely Match" sections, presumably based on the strength of the Gracenote fingerprint, and I was pretty impressed; it showed corresponding albums and the matching tracks from a bushelful of well- and lesser-known singing groups from colleges around the country. Once the matches came in, I clicked Save for individual tracks (or Save All for the batch) and the iTunes metadata began to update on the fly. Cover art was also available for most of the tracks; clicking the thumbnail gave me the choice of which images to associate with the tracks.
Out of the 80-odd tracks I chose, more than 10 couldn't be identified at all; your mileage may vary, but a cursory check showed that most of these were live or other bootleg recordings that were unlikely to be in Gracenote's files anyway. For the most part, the identified tracks were right on the money with artist information. The one clear error was in associating one version of "Stay (Wasting Time)" with the authentic Dave Matthews Band rather than the a capella group that had recorded it.
More problematic (at least for my iTunes usage profile) was that TuneUp was quite thorough in replacing the track metadata with its discovered, correct information. This thoroughness extended to the Genre field, which meant that many of these tracks -- unclassifiable by Gracenote's standards -- ended up as "Data & Other" songs, while others got obscure genres I'd never thought existed. Since I was using the genre of 'A Cappella' as a tag for all these songs, I had to go back into iTunes, sort my tracks by modification date, and change them all back to the correct setting. You might not have this particular issue, but for me it wasn't that pleasant to have to 'undo' the work of TuneUp. A preference setting to allow selective blocking of metadata changes from key fields would probably clear this up.
Overall, if you have a messy iTunes library and you crave some organizational assistance, you probably should try out TuneUp's free version on a few tracks and see how it works for you. I'm not necessarily sold on the full version myself yet, but some work on the cosmetic and performance issues combined with more options on metadata replacement might turn me around.

![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
waiownsyou said 1:41PM on 12-11-2008
Wait, so this only cleans up iTunes? Strange.
Reply
Jamie said 1:55PM on 12-11-2008
What's the deal with Mac apps lately blatantly disregarding Apple's HID guidelines?
This app LOOKS like crap.
Reply
ali said 1:59PM on 12-11-2008
any free programs that do this? this program is good but it seems like it has a lot of extra features i don't need. i just need something that uses gracenote's fingerprinting to ID tracks.
Reply
nz said 2:19PM on 12-11-2008
Check out MusicBrainz and the Mac app iEatBrainz. It works pretty well, but my big complaint is that they tend to favor compilation albums over the actual artist album. So if you toss at it a couple of Counting Crows songs, it'll return something like "Now That's What I Call Music 65" for one of songs, instead of realizing that all of the songs are from the same album.
But ... Free!
Daniel said 2:30PM on 12-11-2008
Try http://www.fixtunes.com. It's not free, but if you use the discount code "TUAW" (on the purchase page), you can have it for free (it's normally $25).
We've been working on FixTunes for several years and have had a Mac version for a while (as well as a Windows and non-iTunes version).
We've also spent a lot of time making sure our music database is as accurate as possible (we use more than one, not just Gracenote) as well as perfecting the look up algorithm (to fix issues like the compilation problem mentioned). FixTunes defaults to the album the song was originally released on.
Feel free to email me with any feedback.
ps. The discount code will work for 25 people. We can't give it all away... ;-)
Mark N said 2:56PM on 12-11-2008
Daniel your code works but it wont allow me to purchace it keeps saying contact customer support.
Daniel said 3:37PM on 12-11-2008
@Mark N - I think you just missed the 25 use cut-off point. Sorry about that. Kelly posted an additional discount code for $5 further down in the comments.
Galley said 2:02PM on 12-11-2008
If you import your music from CDs, then you have the opportunity to verify proper tagging before you do it, and won't need a product like this (as good as it may be). If you get your music from "alternative sources", then you get what you pay for.
Reply
K Whitt said 4:16PM on 12-11-2008
This is not always true. Foreign albums, Live Compilations, and smaller bands or smaller production studios/companies will often not have their information in Gracenote or other built-in recognition engines. Even if it is embedded with CD-text (as many Japanese and Thai albums are), most applications won't read the CD-Text tags even if it can't find the CD Fingerprint in its database it pulls from. This leads to a lot of frustration and hand-tagging.
For the times it does recognize albums from foreign sources, often it will randomly choose whether to romanize titles/names, translate the titles, or leave it in original script (often in UTF-8, but sometimes in things like Big5, Shift-JIS, or even via using native ANSI codepage codes... which causes MORE issues). So just because we own legit albums and are importing them ourselves, does not mean it will be easy to get proper tagging to begin with.
So for the TL:DR; Just because we buy and import our own albums, does not mean it is any easier to ensure the quality of our music tagging.
Doug Adams said 2:09PM on 12-11-2008
You should read what Kirk McElhearn had to say about this *ahem* crapware.
http://www.mcelhearn.com/article.php?story=20081211181225290
Reply
Michael Rose said 5:09PM on 12-11-2008
Not sure why he had such a hard time -- the app does throw up a registration window, and at first I didn't see it either but I did find it without too much trouble.
Tom said 2:25PM on 12-11-2008
Watch out before you install this--it is putting a LOT more in your system than you'd think.
See my write-up at http://tomdale.net/2008/12/11/uninstalling-tuneup-for-the-mac/
Reply
Chris said 2:36PM on 12-11-2008
This app is incredibly, painfully SLOW. It is a spinning beach ball
nightmare. The UI looks rushed and the images are blurry. I installed
it this morning, and have already uninstalled it. I'll wait for a
polished release, if at all.
(For those looking, the uninstall app can be found here:
/Users/"YourUserName"/Library/Logs/TuneUp Uninstaller.app
Reply
BabyGotMac said 2:37PM on 12-11-2008
@Daniel - Thanks, trying it out!
Reply
chadberg said 2:41PM on 12-11-2008
Brown Derbies rock! Excellent choice of test material Mr. Rose.
Of course, I'm biased.
-Chad Bergeron
Host and Producer of The Acapodast
The largest all a cappella podcast.
http://www.acapodcast.com
Reply
Christina Warren said 3:59PM on 12-11-2008
I just had to respond because I've been subscribing to your podcast since like the third episode and you know, you rock.
As does Michael. TUAW needs our own a cappella group.
Michael Rose said 5:14PM on 12-11-2008
Thanks Chad! Big fan of your show.
Zac said 2:43PM on 12-11-2008
Daniel - Thanks!
Reply
Chris said 2:50PM on 12-11-2008
This app is incredibly, painfully SLOW. It is a spinning beach ball
nightmare. The UI looks rushed and the images are blurry. I installed
it this morning and have already uninstalled it. I'll wait for a
polished release.
(For those looking, the uninstall app can be found here:
/Users/"YourUserName"/Library/Logs/TuneUp Uninstaller.app
Reply
Gabe Adiv said 2:59PM on 12-11-2008
Gabe Adiv here, CEO of TuneUp
First of all, thank you to TUAW for the very thorough write up. It’s always good for us to know what we’ve done right and where we can improve for further releases. I’ve sent this blog post to our development team and will work closely with them to ensure that the mentioned issues are addressed.
Additionally, if any of you were testing on the beta version of TuneUp, I can say that many of the issues with the application being slow were resolved before we released 1.0.
Also wanted to respond to some of the comments by the TUAW readers:
As of now, TuneUp only works for iTunes. But we have plans to develop TuneUp for other players early next year.
Before developing TuneUp, we tried other music/metadata management software and found them difficult to use and pretty inaccurate. We continue to improve upon our product to improve ease of use, quality of results, etc. Since launch, we have made 9 updates to TuneUp for Windows and plan on working just as hard for our beloved Mac users (me included).
@Doug – We do have a Help page, which is accessible via the question mark in TuneUp and in the Support Section of our website: http://www.tuneupmedia.com/help/
@Tom – I’m sorry to hear that you were put off by our interface. Would be interested in hearing what feedback you have (feel free to reach me directly at gabeATtuneupmediaDOTcom).
Finally, in terms of the uninstaller, this is on the top of our fix list for the next release to make it more visible and ensure a seamless uninstall process. In the meantime, information for how to uninstall TuneUp for Mac is available on our forums: http://www.tuneupmedia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=634
Reply