Filed under: Multimedia, Software
Google releases Picasa 3 for Mac

Picasa integrates nicely with Google's online photo-hosting service, Picasa Web Albums, by allowing album syncing, uploading, and access control. Album syncing allows you to change a photo (by retouching, changing the caption, cropping, etc.) and have the changed photo appear in seconds on your web album.
Your iPhoto library can be viewed in Picasa in "read-only" form. If you want to make edits to photos in your iPhoto library, you'll have to let Picasa make a copy of the photo and then edit it. Picasa also lets you upload photos to Blogger, create videos of your photos, and create a collage.
It's nice to have a solid option aside from iPhoto to manage our photo collections locally and on the web. Picasa is a free 17MB download.
Get a WordPress.com Blog
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Digaos said 3:21PM on 1-06-2009
Yesssssssssssss!
Reply
Darren said 3:26PM on 1-06-2009
This is probably the nicest Windows-to-Mac conversion there's ever been. It's much faster than iPhoto and uses a fraction of the memory. And it appears to work perfectly with your existing iPhoto library. I'm enjoying browsing all the old photos on my hard drive I forgot I had.
Slam dunk for Google.
Reply
andy c. said 3:37PM on 1-06-2009
i may be the only one left using a g4 processor, but picasa for mac is only for intel based macs.
i've been waiting for picasa on mac since it was released for pc. this is a huge let down.
Reply
balls said 3:39PM on 1-06-2009
get use to it buddy: http://www.tuaw.com/2008/06/12/mac-os-x-10-6-snow-leopard-confirmed-to-be-intel-only/
Drew said 5:49AM on 1-07-2009
I must ditto Andy C.'s comment... Also, it would be nice if Google publicized that Picasa is Intel Mac only.
nggalai said 3:46PM on 1-06-2009
Beware, though: As with Windows, Picasa 3 for Mac can’t handle color profiles. No color management at all, stuff is sent in unprofiled RGB to the display profile, so be prepared for lots of trial-and-error if you want to print photos from Picasa on your (sRGB) inkjet. Especially if you run the OS X default of Gamma 1.8.
I think that’s not really all that great for a photography management software. But then, it’s speedy. So there you are.
Reply
Digaos said 4:20PM on 1-06-2009
Not only the speed. If you want to share pictures with a windows machine, like me, that's great news.
Might be not that great as a photography printing software (which I really don't care anyway). For managing my pictures it will be much better than iPhoto.
m said 8:23PM on 1-06-2009
it's not much of a flaw: picasa is a free app designed mainly to push you to google's online offerings, not a do-it-all photography solution. color management isn't something the average user even thinks about. those who do care wouldn't be likely to depend on picasa alone.
here's the killer feature for me: picasa embeds your tags and stars (not captions, however) directly into the photos themselves, not a proprietary database. you can switch between computers, even OSs, without losing them. it's not easy to find an app that does this, short of expensive professional software or wonky windows shareware.
DaveyGM said 4:12PM on 1-06-2009
This would an amazing announcement if it weren't just overshadowed by the Faces and Places features of iPhoto '09. I've been waiting for facial recognition in photo software for a long time. I have almost ten thousand images in iPhoto and tagging all those has become a task I dread. If Google manages to cram facial recognition in I'll be next inline for that download.
Reply
dano272 said 4:15PM on 1-06-2009
Google already has facial recognition once the photos are put online through picasa webalbums..so I would bet the technology will come soon to the desktop client.
johnny said 4:34PM on 1-06-2009
I had just switched over to Picasa yesterday, having really been impressed by the PC version. Now I'm going to switch back to iPhoto once I get ahold of iPhoto '09!
Reply
Josh Minzner said 6:14PM on 1-06-2009
Okay... Now where the heck is chrome?!?!?!
Reply
David said 6:58PM on 1-06-2009
It looks pretty good but it is unstable. Keeps crashing when it gets past the iPhoto index and starts on the Aperture files.
Reply
Chuck said 8:12PM on 1-06-2009
now if they'd just lower the price of the web albums storage...
Reply
Howie Isaacks said 9:17AM on 1-07-2009
It's not very elegant. I played around with this for about an hour and, I'm not that impressed. I think I will stick with iPhoto. I don't like Google's UI very much. It's too... Windows.
Reply
umijin said 11:14AM on 1-07-2009
Yeah, the Intel Only part sucks for me. My photo management is done on a G5 iMac right now.
Reply
Dori* said 11:35PM on 1-14-2009
HELP!!! What am I doing wrong??? I am trying to upload my photos from iphoto to Picasa but I am only able to upload one at a time.....There has to be an easier way....
I need a walkthrough....anyone?
Thank you...in advance!
Dori*
Reply