Skip to Content

Mac mini, Apple TV to use new Ion platform?

Tom's Hardware says that Apple will use NVIDIA's Ion platform in an updated Mac mini, and AppleInsider says it could also be used in an updated Apple TV.

NVIDIA's Ion platform is a low-cost, small-form-factor logic board that includes both an NVIDIA graphics processor and Intel CPU (among other things). According to AppleInsider, Ion uses the same 9400M chipset used in the new MacBook and MacBook Pro models. We knew that existing iMac and Mac mini models are already using the 9400M as part of the NVIDIA MCP79 platform. Either way, with the 9400M, full-screen HD decoding is built-in.

According to Tom's Hardware, the Ion package slated for use with the Mac mini includes an Intel Atom 330 processor. AppleInsider says that performance gains for a new Mac mini based on this platform could require OpenCL, a technology only available so far in builds of Snow Leopard.

Tom's expects the new Mac mini to arrive in March, while AppleInsider, says that it could arrive "this month." Fingers crossed.

The Apple TV, on the other hand, with its 1GHz CPU, would see a significant boost with Ion. The margins on the Apple TV are already tight, though, and adding more power could break the bank on Apple's "hobby" project. But what if the next-generation Apple TV and Mac mini were one and the same?

It's a floor wax! It's a dessert topping! Stop, you're both right.



Tom's Hardware says that Apple will use NVIDIA's Ion platform in an updated Mac mini, and AppleInsider says it could also be used in an...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

24 Comments

Filter by:
iRive

You guys are sorta reaching aren't you. The last Apple-Macworld is over, Steve is gone for 6 months.. The company has gone into a low energy state. No new products until Jobs is back.

January 17 2009 at 7:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to iRive's comment
jbrown510

Quite the contrary! With Steve out apple needs to prove that it can still function. Wall street has long lamented that apple had yet to put a proper succesion plan in place, this is this trail under fire. I wouldn't be entirely surprised if they delibratly held back at macworld so they could do something bug on thief own in march. An earlier than expected release of snow leopard coupled with hardware that practically requires OpenCL makes a lot of sense.

January 17 2009 at 12:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dvmrp

Atom? oh no, please...I need quad-core

January 16 2009 at 8:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
brett

one *and* the same

January 16 2009 at 7:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to brett's comment
Robert Palmer

Tsk at me: That's an old, bad writing habit of mine. Good catch, and thanks!

January 16 2009 at 7:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tim Rosencrans

ITS A DESSERT TOPPING YOU COW!!!!

That being said maybe will se an ATOM based AppleTV along side a Core 2 mini.

I don't see Apple moving the mini to a slower 1.6 atom but it would be quite a step up for the ATV and still be able to meet the low price point.

And and ATOM based Mini at current pricing would be ridiculous the ATOM is a low power low cost system I would expect similar PCs to retail around $200-$300.

January 16 2009 at 6:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Stephen Lang

I see what you did Apple.

Instead of finally releasing a netbook to shut everyone up, you thought different and put a netbook CPU in a desktop computer.

January 16 2009 at 4:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Stephen Lang's comment
Enigmafan420

Yeah-just what everyone was asking for...

January 16 2009 at 5:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
brian

Noooo! Apple can do what they want with the Apple TV, but leave the Mini alone! (I mean, upgrade it for God's sake, but let it have two fast Intel cores.) And update Front Row too, please--why does it recognize song playlists but not video playlists?!?!?

The fact is, if Apple *really* cared about bring green, they'd quit pushing all-in-ones so hard. Why can't I get something as fast as an iMac but without a screen built in? (Not counting the $2300+ Mac Pro.) EVERY display I've ever owned has lasted long enough to be used with at LEAST two computers on average. And give them more than one connector--my Dell LCD is connected to two computers AND my cable box.

January 16 2009 at 3:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jbrown510

Ok, having just reviewed some of the reference designs Nvidia built for the Ion, I take it back... I think it's definitely the next Mini:

http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3478

January 16 2009 at 3:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jbrown510's comment
Jacob Varghese

I read that review and I'm buying it.

OS X 64 bit
+Atom 330
+Nvidia ION Platform
+bluetooth keyboard
+new remote
+Apple TV interface access to Hulu/Netflix..
+DVR functionality
+iTunes Games
= new Apple One (more powerful Apple TV)
for $299

It would be the perfect computer for most casual users.
At that pricepoint, it would be a very attractive thin client for corporate use.
Apple would continue to produce Mac Minis with more powerful processors as there is still very much a market for lower price quality desktops - schools, colleges, corporations, server farms. I do think they should rid it of the optical drive though.

January 17 2009 at 12:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jbrown510

I hear all these fears the the Ion platform would be grossly underpowered for a Mac Mini. I don't get this... If the Atom 330 is twice as powerful as the 230 by itself, then it sounds to me like when coupled with the 9400M thanks to Snow Leopard/OpenCL it would provide quite a bit of processing power.

I suspect you couldn't watch 1080P video WHILE recalculating your spreadsheet... but it'd do either task just fine on their own.

Reagardless of all this conjecture I still think Ion is destined for a Mac NetBook. It's the perfect platform for Apple to use for such a device. As it's enough better than all the existing NetBooks to warrant Apple's premium design, performance and cost. The can easily market as "We were waiting until we could put real power in a NetBook, this outclasses everything in the NetBook range, etc... and that's why we're charging an extra $200 for it".

I further don't think it's headed to a MacMini simply because I think rumors coming out of shops using MacMini's as servers (MacCoLo) would have suggested something to the effect. While server farms are "power sensitive" and might be interested in the Atom's lower power usage, the overall package doesn't seem server friendly.

January 16 2009 at 2:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jbrown510's comment
d3bruts1d

I could see the Ion and the Atom in a Apple TV or a Netbook, but I really don't see it ending up in the Mac Mini as well.

If the Mini kept the same processor and added 802.11n and a better (non shared memory) gfx processor, I'd be more than happy.

January 16 2009 at 2:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
HB

Intel Core 2 Duo gets "upgraded" to an Atom processor!? Seems like one step forward two giant leaps back!

As a dedicated Mac Mini user I hope these rumours are complete unfounded. Thankfully most Mac rumours are!

January 16 2009 at 2:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tim

Yeah, the writing's been on the walls. When I first saw the Ion at ArsTechnica, I knew it was going to end up in a Mini eventually.

Personally, I predict we'll see an Ion loaded with Intel's Atom for the Apple TV, which will let the Apple TV pull off new features such as faster and better decoding in more formats, even as new ones are formed. Software updates and general computing from the CPU and GPU make that possible, but it needs good hardware to last a while.

I think we'll see something like the Ion in the Mac Mini, but with a Core 2 Duo and maybe a Quad Core option, which will start off expensive but face a major price drop 6-9 months later for the equivalent of a speed bump with no extra needed R&D.

There's not really much of a chance of an Atom being in the Mini, as it's a big stylistic change. However, I think Mac/Book Nanos with Ion and Atom are a possibility for the netbook and nettop markets. Expect the Mac Nano to incorporate traits of the MacBook Air but with slower processing. It'd be designed mostly for web browsing, email, and text editing. Music playback and video are likely as well, thanks to the GPU's OpenCL features and existing video decoding hardware. It likely will have a small SSD and no optical drive, reducing heat output and making it smaller. Maybe it will store and play its iTunes library off of a connected iPod instead of the drive to save space.

The MacBook Nano probably would just be a standard netbook, plus the Ion's GPU. The big feature here would be OSX and Apple's build quality. Multitouch is likely as well, since it would remove the need to give space to a touchpad so it can be small and have a fairly nice keyboard instead.

January 16 2009 at 1:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.