Turbo.264 HD adds AVCHD transcoding savvy
When first we met the Turbo.264 hardware compression accelerator, it did a great job of speeding up video exports on older CPUs but didn't offer a tremendous boost on modern Intel hardware. True, it worked well with Elgato's EyeTV software to transcode TV recordings overnight for iPod or iPhone use, but not everyone needed to spend the money to recover that time.Elgato's got an upgrade to the Turbo hardware now, the Turbo.264 HD. On the one hand, the new unit is limited to Intel Mac owners running Leopard -- leaving out the G4 and G5 users who benefited most from the speed boost of the older unit.
On the other hand, the widget has the ability to export in HD resolutions; you can do basic trim edits on clips and handle almost any input format under the sun. More importantly, the new stick brings a vital feature to HD camcorder users: on-the-fly transcoding of AVCHD video.
Mac users who have AVCHD camcorders have suffered long and loudly with the format, even though native editors like NeoScene and batch converters like VoltaicHD have simplified things a bit. While iMovie '09 and Final Cut/FCE can handle AVCHD, importing is a slow slog. The Turbo.264 HD promises to dramatically reduce importation time for AVCHD clips and offload the work of transcoding them from the computer's processor. If it works as advertised, it's going to be very popular with HD camcorder users.
The new unit is $150US and shipping now.
Share
Categories
When first we met the Turbo.264 hardware compression accelerator, it did a great job of speeding up video exports on older CPUs but didn't...
Add a Comment
Hey folks⦠just mentioning that I searched far and wide for a software-based AVHCD transcoder, tried the well-known one but the only thing that I found to work is a piece of uglyware called iSkysoft iMedia Converter. The program looks like an old, awful piece of Windows spyware but the thing is, it works extremely well and never asks me to enter my password.
April 21 2009 at 1:54 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI read review of the Elgato 264HD and Elgato forum and very disappointed with the product. We are talking about HD video quality but at the same time Elgato turbo 264HD can't even support the basic audio AC3 and subtitles. $150 for just the 3X speed and losing basic audio, subtitles, video quality and many other features is not worth it. I can live with the free slow Handbrake with far superior quality.
Mike
www.e-buzz.ro
March 23 2009 at 12:38 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyTypical... ...I got a Turbo 264 at christmas (and so did my brother) after 2 years of wondering if it was a justified purchase thinking it could do HD (advertising as converts from HD is misleading) only to find out that it could not.... ....now this just adds to the badly timed insult.
It least its £140, not £70 like the old one. This pricing makes it so far out of my league that I don't really care.
Also for the people that want a trade in system there is one... ....its called ebay!
all you people slamming the original turbo264 are insane
Yes with my MACPRO encoding TV recordings for AppleTV was about the same with or with out the Turbo - -- think the Turbo was faster.
But it freed up my MACPRO - If I can get the export time cut in half I will get the new one -
As I hate waiting to encode a TV show I've just recorded.
GREAT PRODUCT NOW and Will only get BETTER
all you people slamming the original turbo264 are insane
I have never had any dislike for mine...only occasionally there is a glitch but for me it is a life saver and once I can afford it I will be getting the new one and selling my old ones on ebay for a nice penny I'm sure
say what you want about Elgato but my life has been nothing but easy since I got the Turbo264 not to mention...Toast, QuickTime, EyeTV and other programs have built in options to allow using the Turbo264 to speed up encoding projects
the plusses by far out weigh the minuses
GREAT PRODUCT NOW and Will only get BETTER
I had the original Turbo as well and it made a small bit of a difference but in the end it sat in a drawer and when I got my new Intel Mac, I never used it again.
Unless reviews from trusted bloggers show otherwise, I would pass on buying this.
@moulles: FWIW you're right. And remember: don't feed the balls... ;-)
March 20 2009 at 10:06 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI've got a question. Is a Aiptek camcorder the cheapest way of doing analogue to digital conversion these days or is there something better?
March 20 2009 at 8:03 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyAdd mkv input support and I would buy it in an instant!
March 20 2009 at 6:33 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply@Jared Blake
you got your wish...this format is available on the new one...check out the site because think it is on the specs tab
I love my original turbo264...it rocks
Hot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- miFrame Picture Frame Dock for iPad for $64 + $8 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
- Hannspree Apple-Shaped 28" 1080p LCD HDTV for $270 + free shipping
- Philips wOOx Alarm Clock Radio for Apple iPod / iPhone for $60 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



32 Comments