Skip to Content

Mac OS X Java security hole exposed

You know, it's fine to make the argument that "Macs are safer than Windows-based PCs," because in real-world usage, this is generally true. Nothing does more to undermine that argument, however, like a five-month old unpatched Java vulnerability.

As Landon Fuller has pointed out, a potentially nasty Java exploit remains unpatched in Mac OS X, including last week's OS X 10.5.7 update. Essentially, this exploit can allow malicious code to run outside of the confines of Java, and run arbitrary commands with whatever user permissions the logged in user has. So just by visiting a website, you could be allowing malicious software access to running commands on your system. Not cool. Not cool at all.

Although the exploit was initially discovered and filed back in August of 2008, Sun issued its own fix addressing the exploit back in December.

So, five months, two point OS updates, one Java update in February and stil, Apple hasn't patched the exploit on their end.

Can I just say, "WTF?" I mean, seriously, get on the ball Apple. You only have $20 billion in cash, maybe investing in a bunch of full-time security patchers for your operating system would be a worthwhile investment!

Julien Tinnes has some excellent commentary on the exploit here. As Landon says on his blog, all users are advised to disable Java applets in their browsers and disable "open safe files after downloading" in Safari. You should also consider using a SSB (site-specific browser) for any Java-crucial web work (see below).

Of course, being forced to disable Java applets just so one can ensure safety kind of puts Mac users who, I don't know, use a web-based SSL VPN client to connect to work systems or e-mail in a bind.

And, let the flogging from the Apple-haters commence.

Categories

Bad Apple Security

You know, it's fine to make the argument that "Macs are safer than Windows-based PCs," because in real-world usage, this is generally true....
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

30 Comments

Filter by:
Scott

I don't hate Apple. I like their products. But I can't help but enjoy reading this because so many Mac users think that OS X is invulnerable to exploits..

May 24 2009 at 5:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rego

"You only have $20 billion in cash,.........."

No.

It's about $30 billion!

May 21 2009 at 3:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chase

Not that I care too much. But the fact that this has been an exploit for the past five months, and this is the first I am hearing of it. I am not too worried. I read all the proper blogs and keep up to date on my info, for the most part.

Swine Flu anyone? Yea, didn't think so.

May 21 2009 at 3:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
5 replies to Chase's comment
Maddy

I have both a Mac and PC and they are absolutely fine, holes or not. PCs are safe if you keep them safe, and Macs are safe if you keep them safe.

May 21 2009 at 2:53 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Level 5

As a PC guy, all that needs to be said is that Apple needs to get on the ball. The one thing you can give Microsoft, is that post XP SP2, they really got on the ball with the security patches (compared to before). Apple has the talent, they have the resources. And they WILL get these issues fixed. Is it a tad embarrassing to have an exploit unpatched for 5 months? Sure. No more or less embarrassing than if Microsoft had done the same thing (and they have). They went through the same sort of gauntlet before they got off their asses, and now XP and Vista are more secure than they used to be. OSX is generally more secure than Windows. And to be fair, this is ONE security hole. I've been an IT guy for years, and have most recently moved to a new company and am now one of the IT guys there as well. Because of this, I've dealt with MANY of them, Windows has been FULL of holes. Honestly no one should bitch at Apple too much for ONE. They need to get on the ball, and I'm confident, even as a Windows guy, that they will do so. Have some heart ;)

May 20 2009 at 9:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
iBearTouch

I disabled all the Java stuff and then had a peek at the American Apple start page (/startpage), then I jumped over to the Canadian version to have another peek.

All I can say is I sure am glad to be Canadian. X-)

May 20 2009 at 6:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to iBearTouch's comment
Hawkman

Did you disable Javascript? Despite the really stupidly misleading name, it has nothing at all to do with Java.

May 20 2009 at 7:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
iBearTouch

OK Hawk, I see what you mean. I appreciate the edumacation! Cheers

May 20 2009 at 8:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike Nilsen

No doubt applets are still common in an educational or scientific contexts, but for the average surfing experience, they're pretty rare. I'm a Java developer and I have my Java Console enabled, so it's very in-your-face when I hit an applet. I don't encounter too many. Flash and other rich Web ui plug-ins (maybe JavaFX!) are the weapon of choice these days.

Universities should probably switch to Java Web Start deployment with signed applets. It might not cure this exploit, but at least you can verify the source of the applet as trusted or not.

May 20 2009 at 6:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
twalls2

Just because some of you guys haven't used Java applets in awhile, doesn't mean no one else does. My school uses them for online classes in Blackboard/Elluminate, and my workplace uses them for remote desktop access through GoToMyPC/Citrix. Those are both pretty popular services last time I checked. I'd just love telling my professor or boss that I can't connect from home because I use a Mac and it is advised that I disable Java applets until Apple gets around to patching a five-month old security hole.

May 20 2009 at 5:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Steve Simitzis

I can't remember the last time I encountered a Java applet. Is this technology still needed for anything?

May 20 2009 at 4:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
royale with cheese

Apparently is needs to be said again:

Macs are safer, but less secure.

All this particular exploit does is emphasize the second point. Rather poor information to panic ratio in this article.

Macs are safer, but less secure.
Macs are safer, but less secure.
Macs are safer, but less secure.
Macs are safer, but less secure.
Macs are safer, but less secure.

May 20 2009 at 4:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.