2GB Eye-Fi Geo exclusive to Apple retail
The Eye-Fi Memory Card sends photos wirelessly from your camera to the destination of your choice, like a computer or the web. Back in January of '08, the product gained Mac and iPhoto support, and support for MobileMe was added in September '08. This week, Eye-Fi announced the Eye-Fi 2GB Geo, which is currently exclusive to Apple retail, both online and brick-and-mortar stores. As you've probably guessed, the Geo adds geotagging to the mix. Once snapped and tagged, photos will be sent to a folder on your Mac or directly to iPhoto, all tagged and ready to go. This makes great use of iPhoto '09's Places feature.
It's $60 for a 2GB card, which is cheaper that most of the geotagging add-on hardware we listed a couple months back. If you pick one of these up, let us know how it goes.
Additionally, there's a Eye-Fi app for the iPhone [App Store link] that lets you send photos to your Mac or certain online services direct from your phone.
[via MacDailyNews]
Share
Categories
The Eye-Fi Memory Card sends photos wirelessly from your camera to the destination of your choice, like a computer or the web. Back in...
Add a Comment
I'm a long distence motorcycle rider and often find myself in extremely remote locations. Any idea how this would work in the middle of Montanta or Idaho or Canada?
August 15 2009 at 11:03 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyNot sure what all the hoopla about this "being designed for the Mac" is... my other Eye-Fi cards work just fine with our Mac...
July 31 2009 at 9:55 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI've been using a geotagging Eye-fi for months and it works well enough for me. It let's me know whether a picture was taken at my house, at a friends, or at what restaurant. I really don't need much more accuracy than that. It has certainly been good enough to tag pictures from pool parties, birthdays, and the like.
From what I can tell it uses a very simple method. It records what the Mac addresses and signal strength of wi-fi base stations that are in range when you take the picture. Then during the uploading process it use that information to query a database to figure out where you are. It isn't exactly rocket science to be able to determine that if the two devices are in range they are probably near each other and the unknown one can then be updated to be in a general area. If you accumulate enough datapoints and combine that with information supplied from other devices that do both GPS and Wi-Fi geolocation, accuracy gets pretty good for most locations.
Don't know how much of an exclusive this is... I wanted to buy one for my Hawai'i trip tomorrow, but I called a couple of Apple Stores and they said they haven't stocked those in a while now. Somebody better tell these guys! haha
July 29 2009 at 4:03 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhats the difference here with this card on the Eye-Fi Explore Wireless card? The explore says it does Geo-tagging too so is there really any difference?
July 29 2009 at 2:53 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDoes anyone know if this model has RAW support? That's the gating factor for me. I can't find any info about supported file formats for this one.
July 29 2009 at 2:41 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHoudahGeo also makes short work of geotagging if you have a regular handheld GPS (that can record tracks).
July 29 2009 at 12:20 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyActually there are some pretty easy work arounds for this kind of thing.
My car has a gps. Before turning the car off, take a picture of the GPS coordinates.
Haha, that's actually a really neat idea. Thanks for the tip.
The geo-location feature of the eye-fi is based on skyhook, check out this site for more info:
http://www.skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/
(I don't work for them, I'm just a nerd)
jwfnia: Do you take your pictures in a wifi hotspot? Otherwise I don't see how it would work.
I agree with the grousers that it's important to point out the difference between Wifi-based location tagging and GPS-based location tagging. 1) GPS is more precise, and 2) GPS works where Wifi does not. The first point I could easily forgive: Wifi location tracking gets me close enough most of the time, although it is occasionally laughably far off. But the second point is going to be a major issue for a lot of people.
It looks to me (and I'd love to have someone who uses it correct or confirm) like you not only have to be in a Wifi hot spot, but you also have to have set up your card ahead of time to recognize and connect to that hot spot. I'm not sure how/if this would work with a typical, public hotspot that asks you to accept their TOS before continuing, let alone one that requires a log in.
Don't get me wrong. It looks neat, and I love the concept, and would love to have one of those cards, but the way it was presented made me think, "Wow, a simple and relatively cheap way to add GPS to a camera that doesn't have it built in." When, in reality, it seems like it would have limited functionality and would not, for me, work for 75% of the photos I take.
I've been using their 4 gig card for several months, and it almost always tags the pics correctly. I disagree with the grousers above.
July 29 2009 at 11:03 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Altec Lansing Octiv Duo iDock for $48 + free shipping
- Used Apple iMac 17" Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz for $430 + $28 s&h
- Lounge Deluxe Stand for iPhone / iPod touch for $28 + $8 s&h
- Brookstone Surround-Sound Earbuds for $14 + $7 s&h
- Refurbished Skullcandy Tokidoki Smokin' Buds Mic'd Headset for $5 + $2 s&h
- Stitchway Backup Battery for iPod / iPhone for $5 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



20 Comments