Bodega: App Store of Mac OS X

With the success of mobile application stores (led by the iPhone's App Store and then copied by virtually every other mobile platform), it makes sense that the next step would be to try to extend that all-in-one browse/download/buy experience on the desktop. The Linux distribution Ubuntu is working on trying to release an App Store-like AppCenter repository for its next desktop release and many Mac users have suggested or opined that an app store for Mac OS X would be beneficial.
Earlier this week, IDFusion Software released Bodega, an independent attempt to bring an App Store-like experience to desktop Mac users. The free program, offers up a list of applications -- both free and paid -- that users can download, review and buy. If you purchase an app, you deal directly with the developer, but your receipt information is stored within Bodega for easy reference.
You can search for applications (more on that later) and get information on the app, read user reviews and see if there are any press reviews (the press clippings apparently come from Bodega's built-in source list so they aren't complete or exhaustive).
I played with Bodega for a bit and tested to see how it works as both a store and an app discovery service.
Look and Feel
Although there are some UI quirks (which is understandable for a first release), the design of the app is slick. The interface very much mimics both iTunes and the Mac OS X Finder. Categories for applications are on a sidebar to the left and the main panel contains lists or specific app information.
I have a few problems with the way apps are categorized and also with application search. Although the categories are actually well structured, applications that fit in multiple categories (or even might exist in one primary category) aren't always where you would expect to find them. Some apps that are even the same type (like a screen shot application) aren't all in the same place. I'm not sure if developers are choosing the categories or if the Bodega folks are, regardless, the categories need to be more consistent.
Although search is good when looking for a specific application name, it doesn't work with anything regarding an applications description. For instance, if I search for "RSS," I get some results, which are valid. But if I search "feed," I get even more results (and several RSS readers that did not show up in the RSS search.)
Search did improve in between the time I first tested some of the features and when I sat down to write this post (a few hours), so perhaps this is going to improve with time.
I wish that you could find apps by tag or by developer to get a more robust sort of listing.
App Selection
Because Bodega is so new, the number of applications available is limited. Developers can submit their apps for free and it looks like Bodega is even offering an iTunes gift card as an incentive to help fill the store.
Part of my purpose in playing with Bodega was to see if I could use it to discover some new apps. Admittedly, I get a lot more information about upcoming software than the typical Mac user, but it's always nice to be able to find something new.
Incidentally, I was able to discover Chill Pill, which is an enhanced Separate Site Browser for Shaun Inman's excellent feed reader, Fever. Because Fever runs off of your own web server it was designed for the browser, and it looks great. Chill Pill offers up a few configuration features and potential options that make a standard Fluid instance a little bit better. It was a neat find, and it's free. Yay.
Having said that, at the present time, the selection that Bodega offers up isn't wide enough to necessarily offer lots of incentives over just perusing the latest releases from VersionTracker or MacUpdate.
Other Features
Bodega has a built-in updater that checks to see if apps you have on your system (that are also in the Bodega repository) have any available updates. Like App Fresh, it suffers from some quirks (reporting that apps that aren't out of date are, or not recognizing if a newer version is available), but the system looks pretty nice.
Final Thoughts
Overall I think Bodega is a solid effort and the idea shows promise. Whether or not this idea will succeed will ultimately depend on how many developers decide to submit their applications. Better search and categorizing coupled with a wider selection of titles could make Bodega a great way to quickly find and learn more about new OS X apps.
Bodega requires Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard and up.
Share
Source: http://appbodega.com/
With the success of mobile application stores (led by the iPhone's App Store and then copied by virtually every other mobile platform),...
Add a Comment
This app is pretty good. I also found Chill Pill through it (before the release on the site too).
I agree this is as good as the apps on it. What would be great is if they synced in with deals like the MUPromo and Maczot sites. Also if bundles were featured too.
Well I've never heard of TechCrunch but am enjoying reading this article 5 days after it was posted.
Good things come to those who wait.
----------------------------------------
This is an app I could see going the way of CoverFlow - i.e. being bought out by Apple as the AppStore model seems to be working so well it seems obvious it'll feature more and more in the desktop world in future.
I think the awning is fantastic. The UI itself is such a big part of what makes this application interesting and engaging. The catalog could be more extensive, but it's only been out a few days.
From what i gather from their twitter feed,t hey launched 3 days ago with 160 apps, and are now at over 400.
Yet another great post from Christina.
I downloaded Bodega and admit I kinda like the awning, but since you can't please everyone, maybe create a preference to turn it off.
As for the app itself, I think it has a lo of potential, but it needs some improving on the version comparison for existing apps. I have three apps that confused it.
LittleSnapper, I have version 1.5, and Bodega says latest version is 1.5.0.
MacGourmet Deluxe insists version 2.4 is current but on the Mariner site I get an automatic download of MacGourmet (not deluxe), and when I manually go to site I find 1.2 for Deluxe is current.
Finally, PhoneView, I hve a paid version but Bodega auto downloads the Demo version.
This is probably related to how the devlopers registered the apps, especially the first one, and the only one that can be solved by Bodega devs is the first one.
So I guess I would say, Devs, when you list your app, test the user experience. Especially if you have a demo version or or Pro version!
Thank you again for coming up with such a cool idea.
Jeri.
I agree as well, Christina. I would rather see something written with thought and perspective than to race for "first post" type of blogging. I think many people have gotten into the habit of having to have everything instantly, regardless of the quality.
Apple is a perfect example of a company that makes careful decisions when releasing software and hardware as opposed to throwing out "me too" products. And I like Apple ;)
It would be cool if AppFresh updated their app to include an app store. It seems like most of the framework is there for it.
August 06 2009 at 9:34 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyChristina -- I think your article may be a little misleading. Yes, Ubuntu is working on AppCentre. But Ubuntu has had a AppStore like experience way before Apple. It is called the Synaptic Package Manager. With Syanaptic you can browse and search for any package in the Ubuntu repository and install it. But the biggest advantage of Synapatic (or any AppStore like program) is it will notify you whether there are updates for ANY of your installed programs and let you update them. It is so much easier to keep an Ubuntu computer (or most other Linux distros) up-to-date than Mac or PC computers.
I believe the big change that is coming to Ubuntu is the ability to easily purchase commercial programs using Appcentre. (Other Linux distros had this ability BEFORE the Apple App Store (such as the ClickNRun appstore)). IMHO, Apple just copied the AppStore that some Linux distros had for years when the created the Apple iPhone App Store.
I do hope Apple creates an App Store for the Mac (for both FREE and commercial programs). The ability to easily keep ALL your software programs on your Mac up-to-date would be well worth it to keep your Mac more secure.
(The individual updaters do NOT cut it. By the time, you launch an out-of-date program to view a video etc, it is TOO late to prevent an infection. The individual updater runs AFTER the infection has taken place. And please do not tell me that there are NO malware for the Mac. That is a lot of BS).
Rob,
I absolutely agree that the idea of an App Store is very, very similar to a repository/packaging system (like Apt-Get or RPM or whatever), but I do think there are some differences. Synaptic is a front-end for apt-get, and it has been very successful -- but the problem is that even though it has categories and you can search for stuff, finding apps can still be challenging. If I want to install a media player and I type in MP3, if I'm not well versed in what is going on, I might not know if I need libmp3 or totem or VLC or mplayer or gstreamer or whatever -- or if I have versions of those dependencies already installed. I see what Ubuntu is trying to do with AppCentre to be akin to CNR that Linspire or whatever tried, in terms of commercial stuff, but also akin to finding apps by usable names. Plus, even if they won't have it in the first release, the ability for users to leave reviews or other info can be totally useful.
Beyond that, while I agree that it would be great to have some sort of official update engine for every app on your system, that really isn't feasible. It works on the iPhone (and in Linux, assuming you only install from your distro's repos and you never grab stuff that isn't in the repositories, and thatâs the "safe" way but it also means you have to wait for your distro's package maintainer to update stuff like Firefox or whatever, rather than just downloading the update from within the application or off the website), because there is only one path for "official" apps. That isn't the case for OS X (nor should it be). So third-party solutions like AppFresh or Bodega or any other update manager are what can fill in that gap. As more and more developers use update engines like Sparkle, it gets easier and easier to manage lots of updates at once.
Quite right, Heimbachae. I see no love for Versiontracker or Macupdate either.
August 06 2009 at 8:41 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replydoes no one realize we've had an app store for YEARS now? it's called www.apple.com/downloads
go check it out kiddies.
Hot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Altec Lansing Octiv Duo iDock for $48 + free shipping
- Used Apple iMac 17" Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz for $430 + $28 s&h
- Lounge Deluxe Stand for iPhone / iPod touch for $28 + $8 s&h
- Brookstone Surround-Sound Earbuds for $14 + $7 s&h
- Refurbished Skullcandy Tokidoki Smokin' Buds Mic'd Headset for $5 + $2 s&h
- Stitchway Backup Battery for iPod / iPhone for $5 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



34 Comments