Skip to Content

Connecticut man consults Apple Genius and gets arrested

Editor's Note: Some comments to this post suggest that TUAW is "giving advice to pedophiles" by reminding readers that sensitive information could be read or copied by service technicians when you bring your Mac in for repair. While one assumes (present example to the contrary) that people who keep illegal content, such as child pornography or evidence of other crimes, on their computers would already be alert to the possibility of discovery, in this case we are addressing the innocent Mac users who would prefer to keep their personal, legal information private rather than inadvertently sharing it with the Geniuses.

Another commenter objected to our publishing of the accused man's name; this information was revealed in the source article in the Stamford Advocate and we repeated it. The post has been edited to clarify the source of the name.


A Fairfield, Connecticut man took his Apple G5 desktop to the Genius Bar at the Stamford Town Center store complaining about some issues with his image file thumbnails. It seemed some thumbnails were overwriting thumbnails on other images and they didn't match up.

As reported in the Stamford Advocate, according to court documents, the Genius started examining the files, and allegedly found pictures of naked juvenile girls in suggestive poses.

The tech called a policeman who was stationed at the mall, and the customer Raymond Miller was promptly arrested and charged with possession of child pornography. If convicted, Miller faces a minimum of 5 years in jail.

Police also searched Miller's home, but found nothing illegal.

Remember, when you bring your Mac into a store for service the technicians will likely see whatever is on your machine in the course of repairing it.

The tech could have ignored the alleged porn, but that could likely make him an accessory under some state laws. Apple warns people to always have a good backup of their data when they bring something in for repair. It's also a good idea to remove anything you don't want anyone else to see -- financial data or home inventories, for example.

This incident is reminiscent of 2 cases in Florida where the Best Buy Geek Squad techs found illegal porn on computers brought in for repair. The employees reported the porn, and both men were arrested.

Then in an ironic turnabout, a three-month investigation by the Consumerist blog caught Geek Squad employees taking porn off a computer and sharing it with others. It was also alleged that some employees routinely stole music, pictures and other data from computers that were in for repair by copying the data off to personal thumb drives.

Via The Stamford Advocate and thanks to Doug for the tip.


Editor's Note: Some comments to this post suggest that TUAW is "giving advice to pedophiles" by reminding readers that sensitive...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

60 Comments

Filter by:
Web design

External hard drives are your friends.

September 22 2009 at 9:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
brian

My neighbor asked me to look at his computer and get it fixed a few years ago, and I agreed since back then I was nice to people.

On the desktop was a folder called Kazaa Downloads, so naturally I expected that to be the location of the malware and virus's that were plaguing his system.

After cleaning up everything and getting it working, i stupidly opened that kazaa folder. It was full of preteen and teen boys having sex with each other. I called the FBI and they came out and inspected it, etc and since they couldnt prove who downloaded the pictures no one was charged.

I dont touch anyones computer anymore, that screwed with my head for a long time.

August 26 2009 at 12:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Omar

So Geniuses open your image files when looking for problems huh?

August 26 2009 at 10:57 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dan Atkinson

This sounds like the very thing that happened to British 'glam rock' star Gary Glitter!

August 26 2009 at 9:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ryan

For all you people crying about child mosters and child porn, did you ever stop to think that maybe that the pictures are of girls 15-18? In some states 16 is legal. Perhaps the guy is maybe 18 -20? I think you guys should get the facts before you judge. I'm sure a vast majority of men in the United States under the age of 21 have at least 1 nude picture some girl sent them. Hell, some probably think the girl is 18 or older because, you know, girls lie about there age a lot. Im not saying its right, if it is actual child porn, but for all you know it could be like 3 nudes from some random girls he knows. It doesn't even specify how many pictures were found. I hate how we are so quick to judge people.

August 26 2009 at 2:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
blackmanny

this is why you should have a second admin account with a strong password of course, on your machine just for tech support.
and use file vault so no matter how your mac is booted your account cannot be accessed because music, pictures and files will be looked at by tech people. it is human nature. spotlight makes searching so much easier remember.
pretty female brings her mac/pc for support her pics will be looked at.
person with lots of music will have it copied.
you have an idea or project you're working on, keep it secret.
start with the idea of security and you won't have to remember to enable it.
if you have a laptop, does it require password to login? if not easily stolen and resold.
does your laptop enable password lock when screensaver or sleep are enabled? if not easily searched when you are away.
have you enabled firmware password so your mac cannot be booted by dvd or attached disc? if not your mac can be searched.

I'm not saying anything. I'm just saying.

August 26 2009 at 2:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dan

Child pornography is wrong. Period. But, given the way the data was obtained and the potential for error, I think it's messed up that the author mentions the guy's name and location in the post when he hasn't been convicted. That's damaging to anyone with the same name in Fairfield.

August 26 2009 at 2:29 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Roger Rabbi

Shame on you Mel. Uh, isn't this supposed to be a tech site? If so, why does your article go from "allegedly" to publishing the guys name within 2 sentences? All you ninnies who want to jump on the "kill the perv" bandwagon, fine. I agree... Once he's convicted.

In the meantime this is TUAW, not USA Today or Fox news, so lets respect some boundaries here. What if the guy doesn't have kiddy porn? What if it turns out the girls were just young-looking and actually consenting adults? What if the pictures were installed by malware? (Oh, that's right, no malware on Macs). Now the guys name is forever associated with being a perv, & he hasn't even been convicted.

Shame.

August 26 2009 at 1:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Roger Rabbi's comment
Michael Rose

Kev, take a look at the source link for the post. The Stamford paper printed the guy's name; we didn't identify him independently.

http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/ci_13193988?source=most_viewed

August 26 2009 at 8:03 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Lance

"Pictures of naked juvenile girls in suggestive poses" is NOT child pornography! There are 100% legal "nude modeling" websites all over the internet for anyone to join. Unless there is a sexual act going on, its not pornography.

If "suggestive poses" is porn, then every modeling/beauty/popularity/teen magazine on the shelf is pornography.

I'm glad his pictures weren't of boys!

August 25 2009 at 11:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Lance's comment
Rego

From the Stamford Times article:

"As the technician began to investigate the problem, she found an untitled folder filled with hundreds of photos featuring 10-to-13-year-old girls, with little or no clothing on, in provocative and suggestive poses, according to court documents."

And you think it Ok to have those images?

Are you for real?

August 26 2009 at 2:46 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Lance

"And you think it Ok to have those images?"
Absolutely. One album contains from 30-150 pictures. A subscription to a single modeling website will easily contain that many images. If they had said "she found an untitled folder filled with THOUSANDS of photos", the situation might be different and more facts would be needed to make a determination as to Miller's intent.
As it stands, this story is nothing more than a gross overreaction of people ignorant of the situation's actual facts.

"Are you for real?"
Yes, a realist.

August 26 2009 at 3:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
brianlareau

OK. You just killed your spouse and are trying to shove them in the trunk of your car, only, their arm keeps getting stuck. So you go to a mechanic and ask him to help you fix the trunk so that it will properly close. Does the mechanic have a legal obligation to report you or does he just fix the trunk and collect his fee and move on? Hmmm.

The guy must be retarded or he wanted to get busted. Did he not understand that the pictures were wrong? I mean, seriously.

If you see something as SICK AND WRONG as child pornography, ANYWHERE, regardless of whether or not you have a legal reason to do so, you have a MORAL obligation to report it.

We live in a society and with that we are beholden to one another to ensure each others safety.

August 25 2009 at 11:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.