Skip to Content

Accordance: powerful Bible study software, only for the Mac

"I switched to the Mac to use this!" might be the highest praise a Mac developer could ever hope to hear. Switching platforms means not just buying a new computer, but also buying a bunch of new software. There are probably only a handful of applications that merit changing platforms all on their own, but Accordance Bible Software is one of them. Accordance isn't just widely respected within the Mac world, it's widely respected within the entire scriptural research software universe. Bible Software Review wrote: "Anyone who knows a little bit about Bible software has heard of Accordance."

The current version is compatible with Snow Leopard, and yet still runs on System 7.5! This is the first time I've seen a Mac application vendor talk about running Mac software in emulation rather than the other way around. Accordance is proudly Mac-only, suggesting to users that once they have switched to Mac they shouldn't put up with "Windows software" on their Macs, and offering crossgrades for those who have made the switch.

Being first is nice, but once other companies have come into the market, it doesn't take long to forget who was first and start to compare based on which features each product provides. Fortunately, Accordance has a lot to offer. There are a wide variety of packages available, ranging from $49 to several thousand dollars, depending on the library options. Like other Bible software programs, you are buying two parts: first, the app itself; second, items for your library, such as commentaries, different translations of the Bible, maps, and so forth. Most users should expect to make an initial investment of at least $100, perhaps $200-$300, but those purchases will almost certainly reflect savings over buying the printed versions.


Choosing packages can be a tricky decision on any platform. The "right" package for you might not be the right one for me. Normally my preference has always been to buy as big of a package as I could afford and reasonably think that I would use, because you usually get a better deal when purchasing up front. However, Accordance has a strong upgrade program which only charges you the difference between your previous package and the one you wish to upgrade to, meaning that you will not end up paying more for starting small. This policy alone makes Accordance a strong choice, even if you cannot or are not willing to make a large investment. Be sure to look at their How to Choose page for help making your initial purchase.

As with all such programs, the packages that you buy depend on what you want and need. While the initial purchase price for some of them may seem steep, these library items are yours forever, as long as you use the application, and do not need to be upgraded. In a sense, Accordance is like an e-book reader (although it is much more than that), and the library items are books on your shelf. Of course Accordance integrates these new library items with the rest of your research and study tools, making the whole program more powerful.

It is possible to sit down in front of Accordance and simply start using it. The main window offers a quick-search access to any verse in the Bible, and a dropdown menu offers you a range of books from which to choose. There's even a Dashboard widget which will look up a verse and quickly insert it into any application; but there is so much more to Accordance. Considering that this software is likely to represent a significant investment, I highly recommend the demo videos and video training sessions which are offered free of charge (some of them are based on version 7) or the weekly video podcast [iTunes link]. Some of the training videos are also available on DVD for $15US but all of them are available online for free. I watched a few of these videos before I even installed the software and within an hour I felt like an expert.

The time you spend watching the videos will help you understand how the program is designed and how the various tools work together. If you're not sure you're ready to take the plunge, a free trial is available to let you get your feet wet. Customer support was extremely responsive, and there are also user forums available, as well as a company blog which shows how actively the software has been developed and how often new versions are released.

About the only difficulty I had with the program is that resources are referred to through abbreviated names. When this involves versions of the Bible they are fairly straightforward, it's no big deal; for example, those who are familiar with translations of the Christian Bible might easily recognize "NASB" as the New American Standard Bible. Other abbreviations, however, such as GNT-T, GNT-TIS, HCSB, BBE, and LBLA might leave newcomers like myself confused. As you spend time with the program and the titles in your library, these abbreviations will become more familiar. The learning curve can be overcome, but don't be surprised when you find the initial ascent to be fairly steep. Also, it should be noted that any Bible study software will have a similar initial investment price and learning curve. If you still have questions, technical support is available through the forums, FAQs, and through phone or email. There are even free seminars held at select locations in the USA.

Choosing Bible study software for the Mac is now like choosing between a camera from Nikon or a Canon. Buying 'packages' for one software program is like buying camera lenses: they aren't interchangeable, which means that switching later on will be an expensive proposition. It makes sense to do your research beforehand and make sure you are buying the right one for you, rather than listen to someone else tell you which is "best" -- it really comes down to personal preference. Accordance has a long track record on the Mac, a solid reputation, and an extensive library of research tools. Combine that with an active and ongoing development cycle and extensive tutorials, and you've got a Mac application which you can expect to use for many years to come.



Categories

Software Reviews

"I switched to the Mac to use this!" might be the highest praise a Mac developer could ever hope to hear. Switching platforms means not...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

48 Comments

Filter by:
Donovan Palmer

I switched to a Mac about a year ago, because Logos for Mac was coming out. I was a long term user of Logos so I was delighted to see my digital library available in OSX.

However, after the past nine months of using Logos for Mac, I began to get impatient with the basic nature of Logos for Mac. Logos for Mac is fine for just accessing a bunch of my resources for reference and commentary purposes, but anything beyond this was messy.

So I began to consider other possibilities. After reading some of the reviews of Accordance, I decided to give it a go. I was surprised, no, I was stunned at how good this software is. It isn't just the best Mac software, but after using PC Study Bible, Logos, WordSearch, QuickVerse, Esword and a few others, nothing compares to the elegance and power of Accordance. It is simple and elegant to use, but yet very powerful and configurable.

The mapping program is stunning. The integration of photos is brilliant and it has the best time line that I have ever seen in a Bible programme. The interface has been designed works with you to create a smooth work flow, rather than you fighting the interface. The management of resources has been designed so that nothing gets buried, yet you don't get overwhelmed with tonnes of resources.

So what about Logos for Mac? Logos is a digital library platform and is brilliant if you need a lot of specialised materials which you will probably never get (nor want to get) on Accordance. I use Logos for Mac for commentary and reference materials for my course work, but unless you preach a lot or are engaged in formal studies, get Accordance. In fact, if you can, get both.

The reason for this is that Accordance is not so much a digital library platform, but rather a study Bible on steroids. I now do all of Bible studying, exegetical and original language studies is on Accordance. I could do some of this on Logos, but Accordance is so much easier to use.

My only regret is that I didn't find Accordance years ago. It is honestly so good, it is worth switching to the Mac platform just so that you can use this programme (though you can run it on a PC emulator). Watch the videos, like the ESV Study Bible podcast to give you a taste of what it can do: http://www.accordancebible.com/downloads/Podcasts

October 11 2009 at 12:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Aaron

I've been an Accordance user for three years now (Library premier and Scholar's standard). I wanted to add a few points the reviewer didn't mention.

First, Accordance's customer and tech support is outstanding. If you're considering buying Accordance, don't agonize over which modules to buy... just call their sales department. They are very helpful (not pushy). This is important because they have so many library resources—and many of them don't come cheap. It can be hard to figure out what collection will be best for your purposes. Tech support is also great.

The second point is that Accordance is flexible and powerful. If you've seen the training videos or attended one of the training seminars, you'll know what I mean. The search capabilities blow away the competition. And for original language study, there really is no substitute, Mac or PC.

A third point is that Accordance is more committed to existing customers than any other software company I've seen. They keep Accordance running on old operating systems, they don't hit you with big update fees (the app 8 upgrade was $39, module updates are free, but library upgrades aren't if they include new modules... but you aren't forced to upgrade modules if you are content with the old version), and they're dedicated to making sure that you'll still be able to use Accordance for years to come, even as Apple itself drops support for older programs. Part of the reason for the higher initial price is that the programmers are intending that you will be using it for years and years to come. They're in it for the long haul.

It's not the only Bible software for Mac, but it IS the most mature and the most powerful. And no, I don't work for Accordance—I just use it.

October 02 2009 at 2:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thrasher

I've used Accordance since its earliest days, and feel it is the strongest Bible study toolset you can use, whether on the net, computer- Mac or PC, or print. Of course I haven't used every one of these alternatives, but of the ones I have used (and I've tested or used many of them), Accordance has the most to offer, and is the easiest to use.

As the for the silly discussion about what is appropriate content on TUAW, it's actually quite easy: if you're not interested, skip the article. TUAW (and every other blog I know of) covers a ton of material, much of which is not of interest to me. So I skip those articles, and focus on the ones that are of interest.

It would be the height of arrogance for me to complain about TUAW writing articles or reviews of the things about which I don't care, or even those I actively dislike. So why do those who complain about this type of review think that TUAW exists only to write about the things they care about? Does this mean that TUAW should not about the things I care about? And who is to know what I, or you, or anyone really cares about?

I encourage TUAW, and the other blogs I read, to write about whatever they think is appropriate. I can either skip the articles in which I'm not interested, or if they end up writing too many that are outside my areas of interest, I can drop them from my reader.

If you want to discuss the particular pros and cons of faith, or politics, or any other topic, there are plenty of blogs and forums that cover those topics. Enjoy!

Meanwhile, I applaud the developers and staff who create and support Accordance. They make great Mac software!

Rick

September 26 2009 at 12:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tdowling

Jay: I think you just accidentally argued that the most we can assume about God is that He is a very well-executed marketing ploy.

September 25 2009 at 9:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jay

When we go into a store and purchase something, it always has a brand name on it from a designer. Often times, we've never seen this designer in person. We only heard of him/her, and have been marketed to in order that we believe they are the designer of this product via television, the internet, and so on. The funny thing about this is, we absolutely unequivically believe of this person based upon their creative evidence? Correct? We never say to ourselves, is such and such really the designer of these shoes I'm wearing? Is this person even real? Absolutely not. We buy their merchandise, flaunt it to impress those we don't even like (most of the time), and it could all be a lie. But! Look at creation in all of its glorious beauty, the solar system, our planet, the precision of all living creatures including scientists. You wanna know what, just look and yourself. Are you an accident from evolution? Did the disorder of rocks colliding create order? We see, feel, and hear very intelligent design everyday. So you don't question these things without anyone witnessing to you of GOD? Is there no DESIGNER of these things??? If not, then the only fair life to live is to believe nothing no matter what, now see how far that gets you... Don't believen in love, anger, happiness, sadness, joy or anyother feeling that "scients" can not explain. If we humans are the inventors of everything, then why haven't figured so many things pertaining only to to creation?

September 24 2009 at 10:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David Huff

Wow, we managed to make it to what ? a whole five comments before someone was compelled to to bitch about "Oh noes! They supportin' teh religion! Do not want!" ?

Really folks, give it a rest and move on to a different blog entry...

September 24 2009 at 9:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jack Brannen

Thank you so much for reviewing this!

September 23 2009 at 10:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tdowling

It can be rather awkward to say these types of things in public, so it's important for people to be able to vent their self-importance within the safe, padded shelter of the Internet.

In fact, you may notice that I'm doing exactly that right now. Ahhh...satisfyin'!

September 23 2009 at 7:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rev. John Canales

I've used Accordance and two major PC competitors and can say that Accordance is far superior.

I began using Accordance when it first came out (1994?). I owned Accordance version 1.1 when I began work at a very large church that only made use of PC's. The church's IT guy went bonkers with my Mac laptop, saying that it would *never* integrate with the network, and despite my plugging it on the spot and showing him that it did, the church bought me a PC laptop and BibleWorks to make up for the loss of Accordance.

Over the years of PC use, I have gone through three versions of BibleWorks (5 through 7), and they have just released version 8. But I have not upgraded. I am finally on my own again, in a small church, so I bought a Mac early this year (ooh, how good it feels to once again have a machine that simply does what I need it to do) and have recently purchased the whole kit and kaboodle for Accordance 8 (I bought both the Scholar Premier and the Library Premier packages).

My impressions: BibleWorks is a good, solid program. It will serve you well. Logos, which I also purchased and used in my years of PC exile, is far inferior to both BibleWorks and Accordance. It isn't much more than a glorified e-reader. Its Bible language component is weak and their UI is atrocious.

Accordance 8, on the other hand, is the very best. (It sure has come a long way since I left it at version 1.1!) Compared to BibleWorks, it has a far broader library of commentaries and helps. On the Bible language and study side, it's not simply that it does more, but that it does things so much simpler, quicker and more effectively than either BibleWorks or Logos. I had to go through the training video and tutorials to learn its true power, but the integration between all your tools (Bible text, commentaries, notes, etc.) is seamless and far tighter than in Logos or BibleWorks.

The only negative is that it is somewhat more expensive than BibleWorks. You have to pay for modules that are included in BibleWorks, such as BDB, BDAG, HALOT, Liddell-Scott, and others. However, having paid the money, I believe you will not be disappointed, but will have considered this a wise purchase.

September 23 2009 at 7:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
punkassjim

The future of humanity, right here, folks. This is what they have to offer. Good jorb, guys.

September 23 2009 at 7:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.