Skip to Content

The future of television is really the present

Editor's Note: There has been a lot of speculation around the future of Apple TV, even though Apple has called it a "hobby" for now. There has also been an extraordinary amount of speculation around an Apple-branded tablet device. Josh Doody has a background in technology, with undergraduate degrees in Computer and Electrical Engineering, experience in engineering, product management and development, and is currently an MBA candidate at the University of Florida. Here are his thoughts surrounding the Apple TV and a possible Apple tablet computer.

The future of television is really the present
By Josh Doody

In David Foster Wallace's "Infinite Jest," he frequently refers to a device called a "Teleputer" (television-computer) or "TP" for short. The TP is high-def, fancy, online and pretty much ubiquitous. Wallace's vision of a TP was probably influenced by that wonky invention called "WebTV," which supremely sucked and mostly served to frustrate people and make them wonder what good the Internet was anyway.

Wallace was essentially spot-on regarding the Teleputer, and several signs point to Apple gearing up for another foray into mainstream must-have technology that will flip the script on television as we know it. Many publications, bloggers and users continue to speculate about Apple's plans for the future. But Apple's foray into two technologies that have been languishing in technological purgatory is more than just coincidence. Taken individually, these technologies will build on the Apple empire, but together they will change the way people consume TV shows, movies and video games.

The Teleputer's older sibling -– Apple TV -– is starting to disappear without much explanation from Apple. However, Steve Jobs and company might be reinventing a new Apple TV (NATV) that is awesome and game-changing, even though it appears to be recycling decade-old ideas and assimilating other ideas old and new. The iPod re-imagined how we consume music. The iPhone re-imagined how we communicate and what it means to be "Online." The New Apple TV will re-imagine how we consume all media.
What is the NATV? It's a TV. It's a DVR. It's a Wi-Fi/ethernet enabled ready-to-go-online, hi-def, Apple-OS-using TV. That might sound a lot like Apple TV, but Apple TV was really just a way for Apple to sell its wares on iTunes. The NATV will be ready to stream hi-def video and audio content directly to your house in two years -– also known as the year Apple turned TV on its head.

Specifically, Apple will be selling subscriptions to sites like Hulu and ABC.com -– which will have to come up with a catchy new name like Hulu, because ABC.com sounds dissonant and lame. Apple will sell subscriptions to these sites a la carte, much like North American cable providers refuse to do today.

Note to Comcast and Cablevision: Apple is coming for you and they're going to pillage market share just like they did in the mobile phone markets. HBO, Showtime, Starz and others will work with Apple to provide an NATV version of Video On Demand (VoD) that makes the cable companies' offering look like a Zune in an iPod world.

The result will be a television that only needs an Internet connection to show viewers all the HD goodness they can handle. Even better, users will get to choose which pieces of goodness they want to handle and pay for it piece by piece – though Apple will also certainly offer packages similar to what cable providers offer today.

Why is this so awesome? Well, first it allows viewers to get away from the cable monopoly and open up the market to a purer form of competition. Purer form could mean "any new form because the cable companies frequently have local monopolies." If Apple can work with content providers to offer VoD pricing options, then so can Philips, Sony and Vizio. Competition is good for consumers because it drives prices down. This paradigm shift will change the way viewers think of DVR. Primetime will become the time when the cool new stuff is ready to watch online.

That's just the first of two technologies that Apple is "coincidentally" moving into. It's a duo of new technologies that will be the ultimate game-changer. The other technology is the Tablet. Bloggers have been speculating that Apple will start producing Tablets for several years. But as the technology begins to come to fruition, it's time to start considering why Apple is finally considering Tablets.

The reason that Tablets haven't yet become mainstream is that nobody really knows what they're for. Many people have been obsessed with Tablets for years, and they spend considerable time showing off the "writing recognition" and that feature where you can turn the screen backwards, flip it down, hide the keyboard and write on it. But why pay $2,000 for an electronic clipboard that's only somewhat reliable?

Apple has the answer: That's not what Tablets are for! They're for controlling peripherals, typing on virtual keyboards and managing media. They're for surfing the Web, listening to music and watching movies on the go. They're for media and entertainment, and maybe when users are done playing, they'll have business applications as well.

With all of this in mind, it's time to talk about the iPhone app that might be the coolest unused and under-hyped app out there: Remote. For the uninitiated, Remote is essentially an iTunes controller that runs from the iPhone over Wi-Fi to control an instance of iTunes on a Mac on the same network.

So what does Remote mean for NATV and Tablets? If Apple can write an app to control iTunes on a Mac, they can certainly write an app for iTablet to control an NATV and its native DVR. Note to TiVo: If this NATV thing works out, you're going to have a lot more trouble on your hands than competing with the crummy DVRs that cable companies are churning out. The Remote app for iTablet could also control an Apple media center or interface with Netflix VoD.

While your iTablet is talking to your NATV, you'll be making a killer playlist of your favorite movies for your next roadtrip. You'll wonder how you used to get long with the little 3-inch screen on your iPhone because what could be a better portable movie player than a tablet-sized HD gadget? Of course, the iTablet will hold all of your music, too. And it will be one of the best portable gaming platforms ever.

The iTablet will open doors to more cool stuff that those hinky, expensive universal remotes with giant LCD screens have been trying to do for years. The iTablet will make watching TV, listening to music, and gaming easy and fun. Even if the functionality of the iTablet mirrors that of the best universal remotes on the market, the Apple User Experience will make the iTablet superior.

But it's clear based on past performance that Apple has no interest in simply matching the functionality of previous gadgets. This company is about making old functionality look primitive and silly in ways that force new competitors to play Apple's game to the benefit of consumers everywhere.

In the sci-fi flicks, people tell their computers what to do, and the computers almost always oblige. Apple has already broken ground with Voice Control on the iPhone 3GS, and Voice Control will be a major feature of the iTablet. In a couple years, an iTablet user will say: "Play movie Big Lebowski," and his NATV will turn on with one of the best movies of all time. Later, he'll say: "Play artist Phoenix," and his Apple Amp will turn on and a dance party will break out in his living room.

Users can look forward to streaming "The Office" on Hulu from their NATVs via their iTablets in the next couple of years. Gadgets are cool, and new technology is even cooler.

Ten years ago, many people started getting rid of their landlines in favor of mobile phones. Five years from now, we'll all be choosing our "cable" options from an a la carte menu on our NATVs, and we'll only need wires to bring the Internet tubes into our homes. Five years after that, we'll all be using WiMax or another ubiquitous high-speed wireless Internet provider. We'll be wondering why we ever had all those wires for phone, DSL, cable or Internet. Our bathroom reading will be eBooks bought on our fifth-generation iTablets. The iTablet will be the ultimate eReader on the market. Note to Kindle: Never mind, they know what's coming. Apple is changing the game. Again. Competitors, eat your hearts out. Consumers, rejoice.

Editor's Note: There has been a lot of speculation around the future of Apple TV, even though Apple has called it a "hobby" for now. There...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

29 Comments

Filter by:
Elwyn

Don't know if anyone's noticed - Apple TV is no longer in the store. At least, not on the australian Apple online store...

October 21 2009 at 6:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Justin

"Note to Comcast and Cablevision: Apple is coming for you and they're going to pillage market share just like they did in the mobile phone markets."

That's a blind statement - in the US, the majority of broadband is provided by the cable companies. Especially so in key metro areas. So when this device comes along and people start canceling their cable TV (the content) but keeping their broadband (the pipe)… well, I can say that there WILL be a problem, I just can't tell you what the problem will BE.

One attempt: cable companies start requiring a cable subscription if you want broadband. Sure, it'd be short lived, but it'd be just one attempt to keep collecting revenue for content.

October 14 2009 at 5:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ben

The biggest hole in this theory is the price. People complain about spending $50 on cable TV and you think they'll $40 per show, per season for Apple to deliver it? While at the same time paying for internet access? At my house we have like 20 season passes, so even if we don't include the cost of the internet connection because we'll have it regardless, we're still looking at $800 per year and that wouldn't even include sports -- love my NFL and CFB -- versus the $600 a year I currently pay for Verizon FiOS.

As for Hulu subscriptions, I think this might actually happen, but again it comes down to price. Why pay $10 or more a month for delayed access to shows in SD and without surround sound, especially when shows are only on there for about 4 or 5 weeks -- some shows I stock up all season before watching them.

No matter how cool the technology sounds, people want to spend less and get more, not the other way around, just so they can use an Apple product. The bottom line is that video isn't the same as audio, so you can't just look at iTunes and what it did to the music industry and expect video to follow in its footsteps.

Now what will happen is that as more and more people use DVRs and skip commercials, it'll make the existing model dead and things will change, then we get to see what happens.

October 14 2009 at 9:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chuck McGinley

Meh.

I own both. PS3 and Apple TV. PS3 is wonderful, but it is not a true network peer. Why cant I print wirelessly or over ethernet for that matter) from it? Why can't it connect to network shares? When I see that then I'll believe Sony's really in the "one device to rule them all" game. Right now it is a game machine and blu-ray. Nothing more. Get rid of the sneaker net Sony!!

October 14 2009 at 8:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jonst52

@Sparks: Instead of converting files to PS3, try to stream them with the PS3 Media Server ( http://ps3mediaserver.blogspot.com ).

October 14 2009 at 7:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Larry B

Great article and lots of great comments! I love the title which just sucked me right in. I can't wait for the NATV and have been trying to imagine all that it can do for years. For now, I make do with a full home theater PC but that's not as cool as I'd like it to be. It does record beautiful high-def content for free with an over the air antenna.

I sell and configure universal remotes for use with home entertainment & control systems and companies like Savant (http://www.savantav.com/), Control4 and others are already realizing that the iPhone is a total game changer because only the very rich wants to buy expensive $1000+ color LCD remotes but everybody wants to be able to control everything from a convenient, updatable touch screen device. The iPod Touch and iPhone are so much better. NPR just did a piece which touched on this on this week's All Tech Considered.

Being able to control your thermostat, adjust the oven temperature (or get it preheating from the road), and of course to be able to access not just your own media library but all of the free content and subscription services available now. Reading magazines, books, watching movies, shows, streaming courseware from major educational institutions, monitoring home or business security cameras, the possibilities are pretty endless.

Great imaginitive piece Josh Doody. I hope Apple surprises us all soon.

October 14 2009 at 2:51 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dan

I want to do whatever I want with my media, especially if it's purchased, and I don't want to watch advertisements. I don't want a company far, far away to be able to say "nah, you can't watch this movie" and disable it, delete it, whatever. So if Apple wants to stream me media, fine. But if they want me to use their box, they sure as hell better open it up and let me play my own (DRM-free) media too.

I see a much brighter future in the Mac Mini as a living room box than the locked-down AppleTV.

October 13 2009 at 8:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
msavwah

Maybe I missed it but none of this will get out of the gate when all isp's are charging by the gb

and ps3 ain't all that either. It's nice and I have one but the user experience is 5 yrs behind (yes Microsoft) xbox live.

My ps3 is a bluray player
my xbox is for games and netflix
my appletv is for my movies and music and it's brilliantly controlled via my iPhone

I would hope to see the appletv become the best of all of the above and a mac mini (which I also have)

but none of that really matters without a major change regarding isp's
they won't allow the authors ( along with mine and your) dreams to come true

October 13 2009 at 6:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jozue

Sorry, you lost me at 'selling subscriptions to Hulu'.

Since Hulu and other services are "unavailable in your area", that being my "area" as in the whole of the rest of the world besides the US. Unless apple figures out a way to sell all of the content to anyone around the globe, then for me, this is lame.

October 13 2009 at 5:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jae

who's apple?

October 13 2009 at 5:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.