Mac Pro 'hexacore' Xeon Core i7 debuts Tuesday?
ZDNet is reporting that the next iteration of the Mac Pro will be unveiled next Tuesday, March 16th. Their sources indicate that Intel's new 'hexacore' Core i7-980x chip, which is also expected to be launched next Tuesday, will be in that machine.Code-named "Gulftown" the 32nm, six-core i7-980X will be labeled as the i7x ("Extreme Edition"). It will be the first dual-socket, six-core processor from Intel. With 6 cores and 12 threads, a dual-configured, i7-980X Mac Pro will sport 12 physical cores and 24 logical cores with a top frequency of 3.33GHz.
Excluding the minor speed bump in December, the Mac Pro has not been updated for over a year. In December we reported on the leaked Core i7-980X specs. Two months later, HardMac reported that the new i7x Mac Pros could be delivered in February. With the launch of the i7-980X on Tuesday combined with HardMac's sources indicating a Mac Pro refresh that day as well, the i7x seems like a lock for the updated Mac Pro. However, as MacRumors points out, Apple has typically used server-branded Xeon chips in its Mac Pro line, and Intel is expected to debut a number of new Xeon 5600-series chips on Tuesday as well, notably Intel's 2010 flagship chip – the Xeon X5680.
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
WiLLGT09 said 12:08PM on 3-11-2010
that great and all, but...I really hope a MacBook Pro update come alongside this.
Reply
Subhash Roy said 12:58PM on 3-11-2010
Me too, mine are pretty long in the teeth
Chris said 1:29AM on 3-12-2010
Same here. Apple, please stop fretting about the battery issues (and just use a bigger one) so that the new MBPs are released sometime this decade.
Mac Pro is a nice computer, but it really is overkill for most people. It is great (even just going by performance benchmarks), but as long as the weakest link in the chain is the hard disk, weak on the order of milliseconds, it won't be worth the premium price adopters are paying for a processor, weak on the order of nanoseconds. I think people are really fed up with rotating hard disk. It seems so 20th century.
jackleboul said 12:15PM on 3-11-2010
Interesting but I always felt that the Achilles heel of the Mac Pro never was the processors but the GPU. Would be interesting to see what changes Apple will bring to this monster.
/Jack
Reply
Jeff said 4:55PM on 3-11-2010
The Achilles Heel was always the price. At least for me. I'm sure these will remain out of the hands of us mere mortals. And Apple will continue to not provide us with an affordable desktop tower.
jackleboul said 6:20PM on 3-23-2010
Good point but for us who have money, GPU on a Mac Pro have always been the weak part.
joseph le brech said 12:17PM on 3-11-2010
Quad Core Mini?
Reply
thezonie said 12:20PM on 3-11-2010
I sure hope this rumor is true ... My MacPro1,1 is getting a little long in the tooth.
Reply
Mr. Energizer said 1:59PM on 3-11-2010
What is is lacking? I own the same one.
thezonie said 2:16PM on 3-11-2010
What's it missing? About 8 additional cores. ;)
But seriously, this week I noticed that 2 of my 2 GB sticks of RAM were only being recognized as 1 GB a piece, reducing my system's 6 GB to 4 GB. I assumed that the problem was the RAM itself, so I went to Fry's to get some more, and they didn't have any DDR2, just the DDR3.
So I figure that if there comes a time when parts are starting to fail and Fry's doesn't have the parts that I need then it's time to put it out to pasture.
Other than that it's doing just fine. :)
Ed Silver said 12:34PM on 3-11-2010
Where the heck are the new MBP's?
Reply
Anthony said 3:58PM on 3-11-2010
Seriously! I need to replace mine! It's four years old and one of the fans died. I already had to replace the hard drive, too! I'm definitely not buying a C2D MBP. With my luck, if I did buy one, the Ci7 MBP would be released about a week later. That's what happened when I got my MBP. The C2D version was released a week later, and I'm stuck in the land of 32-bit computing.
aragorn ii said 12:52PM on 3-11-2010
What's more powerful - a single hexacore or dual quad core?
Reply
Randy said 1:44PM on 3-11-2010
With Dual-Quads, you'll have two extra Cores over the Single Hexa-core.
oedipus said 4:03PM on 3-14-2010
Honestly, processor power will be minimal, unless your really using all the cores. The biggest factors for me are the added cores for virtual computing, and power savings of the new Xeon 5600's. I really hope they add dual Power supplies to this new one, as that has been my biggest concern with the Mac Pro architecture. (Cross my fingers, as I haven't been let down yet.)
ianlive said 1:56PM on 3-11-2010
As a horse ages, it's gum line tends to receed making it's teeth look longer, hence "long in the tooth."
The phrase "never look a gift horse in the mouth" stems from this same notion. If you were given a horse as a gift (man, remember those days?) it was rude to check it's teeth, or look at it's mouth, to see how old, or worn out, your new gift was.
Thought others might find that interesting. And when the hell are they going to redesign the Mac Pro case?!
Reply
Mr. Energizer said 2:03PM on 3-11-2010
Interesting trivia. Thanks.
I would imagine a case redesign that would make the front holes laser edged instead of drilled. This would match the speaker holes in the new mbp.
Rembert Oldenboom said 3:54PM on 3-11-2010
Hey Apple, my MBP 2,2 starts to fall apart - well, not really: it still does work properly but I could do with a good speedbump and more diskspace. I'm not in the race for a Mac Pro. However a new iMac is planned in the not so near future. But, please hurry with that MBP.
Reply
Microdot said 7:57PM on 3-11-2010
ive been holding off on an upgrade of my mac pro 3,1 for just this reason. skipped the nahalem all together. granted... my baby is still a monster (dual 3.2ghz, 16gb ram, raid cont, striped velociraptors) but if i keep up, the cost of upgrade is drastically reduced (mine will sell for almost 3/4 of the new model, unless something drastic changes to pricing)
Reply
elpaule said 8:35PM on 3-11-2010
Didn't Apple always use Xeons in their Mac Pros ? And as within the next weeks Intel is shipping the 8-core Xeons, wouldn't the 6-core desktop Core7 desktop CPU look a bit underpowered in comparison to the proposed 4-socket x8 core Intel server mainboards?
And the Xeons have the same TDP as the old ones, so they would only need to switch the motherboard, while the Extreme Edition i7-980X runs a lot hotter.
I thought the whole idea of switching to Intel was to get priority access to Intel tech, and not after everybody else has it?
Reply