Skip to Content

Articles: Wikipedia with class

If you frequent Wikipedia -- and appreciate an interface that's both beautiful and highly functional -- Articles is an iPhone (and iPad) app you should try. Going beyond just being a wrapper for the less-than-beautiful compendium of user-generated knowledge, it offers a very pleasing way to navigate the tomes.

In addition to normal browsing, Articles offers integrated maps and uses geolocation to offer items of interest around you, or around any location you specify. It also has support for multiple pages, a la Mobile Safari, so you can follow multiple lines of research without losing your place. Automatic spelling suggestions help you locate your information, and an integrated chapter browser helps you navigate. You can bookmark pages, and organize bookmarks in folders, as well as search your history by day. Recently-viewed articles are even available offline.

I haven't played with every Wikipedia app out there, and I've heard some great things about others like Wikipanion. Within my experience, though, Articles is a very complete solution and definitely worth a look. Articles is available for both iPhone ($2.99US) and iPad ($4.99US). I've only had the opportunity to play with the iPhone version, which is beautiful, but I'm really looking forward to trying it on the iPad, where its gorgeous interface and fluid usability will really have a chance to shine.



Categories

App Review iPad

If you frequent Wikipedia -- and appreciate an interface that's both beautiful and highly functional -- Articles is an iPhone (and iPad)...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

3 Comments

Filter by:
john.gersh

While Articles is certainly impressive in many ways, it has a serious flaw for serious Wikipedia readers. Articles articles do not include the footnotes and references from the Wikipedia articles. Backing up statements with citations to external sources is fundamental to the Wikipedia philosophy. Without them the reliability the of information in an article can't be idependently assessed. The user can't browse further into the topic, either.

All of the other Wikipedia apps that I've seen include the footnotes and citations. It's strange that Articles omits them. If the omission is an aesthetic judgement by the author, an option to view them might be a good idea. Perhaps they'll appear in the next version.

April 03 2010 at 11:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Grant

I use this app for Wikipedia. It is by far the most beautiful and functional Wikipedia app I've found. Sophistication Software makes very good, and very well-designed apps. Not to try and sound like an advertiser (I'm in no way affiliated with Sophistication Software), but check out some of their other apps:

http://www.sophiestication.com/

April 02 2010 at 8:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Grant

I use this app for Wikipedia. It is by far the most beautiful and functional Wikipedia app I've found. Sophistication Software makes very good, and very well-designed apps. Not to try and sound like an advertiser (I'm in no way affiliated with Sophistication Software), but check out some of their other apps:

http://www.sophiestication.com/

April 02 2010 at 8:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.