Skip to Content

Breaking: C4 indie developer conference discontinued

C4, Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch's independent Mac developers conference, is no more. First held in 2006, C4 offered a highly intense way for developers to share technology know-how with each other. It provided a bottom-up approach to improving Apple platforms from developers all the way back to Apple.

In an impassioned blog post, Rentzsch has explained his reasons for shuttering C4. He writes that Apple's insistence on top-down control over its platforms (presumably more the iPhone OS than the Mac) crushes innovation and makes developers overly reliant on Apple for moving technology forward.

Rentzsch explained, "By itself Section 3.3.1 wasn't enough to cause me to quit C4. I've weathered Apple lying to me and their never-ending series of autocratic App Store shenanigans." His link on 'lying to me' references the now-infamous Steve Jobs assertion that a rogue iPhone app could bring down Cingular's network.

The lack of community outrage to the 3.3.1 dictate (the portion of the iPhone OS 4.0 developer agreement that forbids third-party toolkits for app development) pushed him past the edge. "With resistance to Section 3.3.1 so scattershot and meek, it's become clear that I haven't made the impact I wanted with C4. It's also clear my interests and the Apple programming community's interests are farther apart than I had hoped."

C4 will be greatly missed. Responses to the conference's termination include this note from NetNewsWire dev Brent Simmons.

Categories

Apple

C4, Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch's independent Mac developers conference, is no more. First held in 2006, C4 offered a highly intense way for...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

18 Comments

Filter by:
4nNtt

Also... when did C4 become an iPhone development conference? I thought it was for the Mac... so that section wouldn't apply.

Anyone else up to start a new Mac conference in Chicago? Arstechnica are you listening... you would be a great host! As others said, WWDC sold out before I had time to buy a ticket... there is definite demand here.

May 13 2010 at 12:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
4nNtt

If that is the real reason... then he needs to grow up. I don't know any real developer that would consider Flash a development tool. Development tools that properly support the Objective-C runtime are supported. Look at what Apple is doing with MacRuby. Wouldn't that be a nice thing for C4?

May 13 2010 at 12:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
josef

no one will miss that circle jerk "conference".

the real reason for him to closing C4 is because he has not made a fton of money with it.

May 13 2010 at 3:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
frank.lowney

This is difficult to understand. There must be more to it that what Rentzsch is saying.

With WWDC selling out in only eight days and Apple Design Awards becoming iPhone OS-centric, the need for Mac development learning and sharing opportunities outside of Apple is greater than ever.

May 12 2010 at 5:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
PC

Sounds a lot like whining to me... My guess is he's just making excuses and really doesn't want to put in the effort, which is his choice, but don't try to go out blaming something else.

May 12 2010 at 4:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MarkHernandez

When I read things in blogs, I like having things explained to me. I found myself uninformed by Rentzsch's post. For example, what can be improved with the existing developer tools? What language improvements should there be that you've been campaigning for that are seriously needed? In what way, exactly, is Apple not listening or getting it?

I wrote my first program 42 years ago and have seen scores of great languages and tools come and go. It may well be that further innovation is not what developers really need to move forward. I could write a whole piece on why I believe that's the case, and the real impediments to progress lie elsewhere.

In addition, I didn't understand the mention of Section 3.3.1, which applies to software development for Apple's mobile devices, not the Mac, so I was confused by that.

Well, the world is a-changin'. In a similar way to how Apple sees their brick and mortar stores as a far more useful alternative to, say, the MacWorld conference which is only accessible to the privileged few... programming conferences (even WWDC) are also only accessible to the privileged few. At least WWDC offers access to 1,000 Apple engineers, but Apple still makes all the conference's session videos available to everyone planet-wide in just a couple of weeks afterwards for those who could not attend.

What we are perhaps seeing here is the need for a new model. What about the smart people like myself with a lot to learn and a lot to offer, but are unable to make it to C4 conferences? How do I get to participate?

I have the internet in my pocket, on a tablet and on a screen. Bring C4 to me using these devices and maybe you'll generate so much participation you won't have time to complain.

It's relatively easy to schedule a meeting room and have people show up, but creating a continuously active online community that keeps it's focus and builds consensus is hard, but that's the next frontier. Think about it.

As a co-administrator of iPhoneDevForums.com, I know first hand that online forum software is one of the biggest and most useless anachronisms there is. Want to innovate? Start thinking of building a new tool in that category that's worthy of the 21st century.

Mark Hernandez
The Information Workshop

May 12 2010 at 3:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
RidleyGriff

I honestly can't believe that there are readers here who are applauding -- or giving a big "whatevs" -- to the death of a conference that it is clear countless developers got enormous value from, and was a positive force in advocating for Mac development over the past few years. C'mon people -- this is a bummer, no matter if us end users have heard of it or not.

That said, the tenor of Rentzsch's letter doesn't leave one with the most favorable impression. If his bottom-up efforts haven't been succeeding thus far, and developers have not been as frustrated as he would have hoped, shouldn't this be a reason to redouble such efforts? Political campaigners don't give up when they lose an election; they continue forward to educate and inform; surely this is similar terrain.

But of course, that is quite easy for someone like me to say from the outside. At the end of the day, nothing but applause to Rentzsch for his efforts and advocacy.

May 12 2010 at 3:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to RidleyGriff's comment
Joshua Ochs

No one is cheering the loss of a useful conference. This year it could have been more useful than ever, as we need some focus on Mac development - which remains as free and open as ever. But the long and the short of it is that Wolf decided to take his ball and go home. He's being extremely selfish, and I don't see any reason to toast him for it.

May 12 2010 at 3:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
RidleyGriff

Not toasting the move to shutter, and as I wrote above, I don't agree with it philosophically either -- but the first couple comments up above? C'mon. Difference between disagreeing and flipping the middle finger.

May 12 2010 at 3:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mark

So, Rentzsch is taking his ball and going home because the community doesn't completely agree with him?

Am I getting that right?

There must be a word for that… ah @ilkyone had it right—sour grapes.

May 12 2010 at 3:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
macserv

The lack of outrage over 3.3.1 is due to the fact that Apple provides excellent frameworks, development apps, and profiling tools. Working in Eclipse after using Xcode is annoying at best, and dropping back to (God forbid) Visual Studio is just painful.

May 12 2010 at 3:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to macserv's comment
josef

hehe. this.

also he says apple has not made any software engineering innovations ... well I don't know what he calls cocoa (a massive smalltalk-inspired framework). what does he want? writing apps in some javascript bastard language?

May 13 2010 at 3:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
kf9z

YOU think the framework provided by Apple is great and above all else - I do not. I think it is great for some things and not for others and as a developer why should I be forced AWAY from using the tools I like just to please Apple if the end result is a functional, stable and successful app?

This is the problem with Apple - you do it their way or no way. I get that to a point and you mentioned Android - this would NOT have happened had the developers had access to the code required for proper implementation of copy/paste as you mentioned.

I do not like being told what I can and cannot use - MS does not actively do this and has not actively sought to stifle third-party tools and environments. Have they? Yes but they learned. Apple may well learn but my guess is no as they further delve into the world of micromanagement and ultimate control.

I think C4 was an interesting exploration of development but ultimately a disconnect from the way Apple has chosen to go. Too bad, really. I think good points have been made both pro and con - and each their own.

D

May 13 2010 at 9:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
david watson

C4?

Never heard of it. Hmm guess it doesn't matter now.

May 12 2010 at 3:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.