Patents hint at iMac Touch and touchscreen MacBooks

Apple is clearly driving very quickly toward mass adoption and integration of its iOS software, and these patents certainly support that. As far as the "iMac Touch" patent, apparently you'd get the best of both worlds as far as Apple's OS offerings are concerned. Based on the orientation of the display, the iMac would switch between Mac OS and iOS. Lay it flat, you get iOS. Stand it up, you get Mac OS.
Obviously there are many Apple patents reported that never will see the light of day, but I believe this one has some meat to it. For an iMac refresh, this seems a very logical update. Though it makes sense we could see the same thing in a MacBook update, I'd say we'll see an iMac sporting this dual-OS first.
Share
With the sweet glass-fronted, LED-backed displays on the newer MacBooks, Apple seemed a step closer to giving us touchscreen displays...
Add a Comment
I highly welcome this, and really really hope that this will surface either on the next iMac refresh in a year, or in two years. From time to time, I have been craving the no-nonsense style of the cheap one-trick ponies that constitutes the app store (as the photo apps that applies filters) on my desktop. It is a bit of a hassle to transfer the photos from my mac to my iPhone and back again to apply a simple filter. Yes, I am as lazy as I am cheap.
I did buy the desktop version of CameraBag for doing this, but it was a bit too expensive. I hope the App Store would take the price point down a notch.
Rather than âsticking to your gunsâ and maintaining a focus on your core business, try branching out like Apple and Nike have ---- it will actually feed buyers back into what your core product was.
http://bit.ly/b0EppK
Sorry, TUAW, but iOS is not replacing Mac OS X in Macs. iOS is a subset of Mac OS X, so it's missing all sorts of features that can't fit in the memory of an iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch.
Mac OS X has supported touch-screen input for a long time, and it also supports changing the orientation of the display, which was done long before Mac OS X with Radius displays; iOS is not need for any of those things.
I cant see using this for anything other than 'tapping' apps. You would be using an accelerometer, you wont be using any shaking, tilting, etc. And tapping that thing from the looks of it would be awkward unless that base keeps the machine in place.
I will say though that this is genius. My 3 year old often tries to tap stuff on the screen while I'm working or browsing the web. She thinks everything should be done via touch.
I still think it's funny that 20+ years ago Apple told us 'This is a mouse' and people gasped for air, then they copied it. Now they tell us 'This is a touch screen/mouse free interface' and once again people are gasping and people are copying.
Yep. Apple is going to let OS X die a natural death by putting ALL its resources in the MORE PROFITABLE iOS Operating System.
Steve can't wait to get 30% of ALL third party software sales. Great Business Model. But not great for consumers.
Yeah, more profitable usually means more people are buying it. How is that bad for consumers?
And the app store, Apple don't make a whole lot there; they make money from the hardware. This argument has been on the internet for years, and yet people still don't get it.
Well Apple claims it does better than break even from MUSIC sales in the iTunes sales. That could mean anything from small profits to huge profits. No one really knows since Apple has never released the profit it makes just from Music sales. But like you, I would not be surprised if Apple has settled on a LOWER profit margin for music sales so it can sell more hardware.
To my knowledge, Apple has been pretty quiet on what it makes from the App store. Getting a 30 % cut from all sales of third party software sounds like a great margin to me. If Apple cannot make a good profit from these sales, Steve should step down.
Right now, Developers for Mac OS X do NOT need to give any $$ to Apple. If there are FORCED to give 30 % of their sales to Apple for new Macs running iOS, don't be surprised to see PRICES for third party software rise. That is why I say it will be bad for consumers and good for Apple.
Woah. I would totally use that!
Just I think they would need to make the chin even smaller, or eliminate it altogether.
Me likey. Almost all of my computing at home these days is done in iOS. I would love to have Mac OS X to fall back on for the big jobs, but for most of the time use iOS apps.
August 24 2010 at 12:50 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyLooks like a lot of the people whispering about apple eventually trying to shove off OSX and replace it with iOS might have been on the right track.
Eeek.
Maybe OS XI Will have elements from iOS and OS X
August 24 2010 at 12:35 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIt would make more sense for an iMac to switch between an iOS or a MacOS interface depending on it's orientation. I doubt very much that Mac OS is going away any time soon, probably the two will be to some extent, merged.
August 24 2010 at 1:24 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Apple MacBook Pro i7 2.2GHz 17" Laptop for $1,800 + free shipping
- MacBook Pro Core i7 Dual 2.7GHz 13" Laptop for $1,200 + free shipping
- Amzer Flip Case for Apple iPhone 4 / 4S for $8 + $4 s&h
- Apple iPad 2 16GB WiFi Tablet for $429 at Meijer stores
- Bling Diamond Snap-On Shell Case for iPhone 4 / 4S for 49 cents + $2 s&h
- Acase Superleggera Dual Layer Case for iPhone 4 / 4S for $6 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



12 Comments