Skip to Content

USB 3.0 for Mac benchmarks and review

Don't let Apple's lack of USB 3.0 support get you down. LaCie has you covered with the 2big USB 3.0 RAID drive, and Engadget has run benchmarks on it.

The gang used a "relatively new" Mac Pro with the following specs:

  • Apple Mac Pro (2009)
  • 2.66GHz quad-core Intel Xeon 'Nehalem' CPU
  • 6GB (2 x 3GB) DDR3-1066 ECC memory
  • NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 (512MB) GPU
  • 18x SuperDrive
  • Mac OS X 10.6.5
  • Bluetooth 2.1+EDR
  • LaCie USB 3.0 PCIe expansion card
In addition, they used a 2big USB 3.0 drive, a 500GB Iomega Skin (for USB 2.0 work), a 500GB Seagate FreeAgent Go FW (for FireWire 800) and a 160GB G-Technology Combo (for FireWire 400 performance testing). Finally, a series of nested folders and various files, (big, small and plentiful) set the stage. Here's what happened.

In the write test, the 2big clearly out performed its peers. It was twice as fast when transferring the smaller files, and 33% faster than its older brother, USB 2.0, when transferring a 9.4 GB file.

The story was similar with Engadget's read test. The 2big managed 45MB/sec - 61MB/sec, compared to 29MB/sec -37MB/sec from USB 2.0.

There's much more to read, and we suggest checking out Engadget's article in full. The LaCie solution is quite appealing. You listening, Apple?


Categories

Accessories Apple

Don't let Apple's lack of USB 3.0 support get you down. LaCie has you covered with the 2big USB 3.0 RAID drive, and Engadget has run...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

9 Comments

Filter by:
eric f

I kind of wonder what was up with the FW800 performance of the drive included in the tests. In my experience it outperforms USB 2.0 in every aspect, and it even lost a test to FW 400.

December 21 2010 at 3:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
iPhone user

USB 3.0 is one big "meh" for me. It will die when Light Peak hits the market.

December 20 2010 at 6:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to iPhone user's comment
Renzatic

Hardly. Granted, Light Peak is pretty damn neat, but USB is a well established standard. It'll take at least 2-3 years after its release before you start seeing LP devices saturate the market like USB is today.

At worst, this'll be the last USB generation. But it won't die as the moment LP shows up. You might as well grab a couple USB 3.0 thumbdrives and enjoy the extra speed while you wait for that next big thing.

December 20 2010 at 8:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tom

Apple don't need to saturate the whole market, just the high-end side. You're going to have more >$500 machines running USB3 for starters, and Apple can take the hit for adding LP to their MacBooks.
Apple can add LP into their Mac lineup, and that'll mean millions of LP compatible Macs - which can then use LP compatible ecosystem products.
They can have USB3 too - not a problem.

LP can bring daisy chaining, possible MagSafe/USB3 dual cables, and is a peer if not better than the other standards coming up (HDMI (ethernet which is a shockingly low speed), USB3 etc).

What was the USB3 like compared to eSATA? Annoying that you need the updated Expresscard to run USB3 via Expresscard, but (so early 2009 MBP and before won't have this)

December 21 2010 at 9:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
knewsom

LaCie is garbage - I've only had a SINGLE drive of theirs that did NOT fail, out of 6 or 7 in total. It's a travesty that Apple allows them such prominent placement in their stores and online. LaCie has become synonymous with Apple products, and sadly a lot of Apple customers still think they need some special hard drive to work with a Mac, when essentially ANYTHING will do. Really sad.

Also sad is the speeds this boasts - wow, a whopping 33% increase over USB 2? Gee, I'd better buy a Mac Pro so I can put one of these cards in... Sheesh, my FW800 equipped 27" iMac ain't looking so bad after all.

December 20 2010 at 2:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
james

too bad lacie drives fail like no ones business. i'd never buy another lacie in my life.

December 20 2010 at 2:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
nicleT

Works only with LaCie devices. Shame on them!

December 20 2010 at 1:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to nicleT's comment
Johnny

Where did you get that? I think they just happen to be using LaCie drives. They were probably given to Engadget by LaCie.

December 20 2010 at 2:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Johnny

Nevermind. I found what they were saying about that. That's complete BS if even a handful of drives don't work for whatever reason.


To james below: I never had any problems with the drives themselves, but the power supplies go out in a way that makes it look like a bad drive. I used to use nothing but LaCie externals until 3-4 of them had the same problem. To their credit, they did replace all of them and two of them were a little out of warranty.

December 20 2010 at 2:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.