WiebeTech RTX220-QR RAID: SSD speeds at HD prices
If you're looking for a 2-bay RAID setup for doing either mirrored (RAID 1) or striped (RAID 0) storage or backup, what do you want? Something pretty and shiny, or something that looks like it can withstand a direct attack by a squad of Marines who are having a bad day?
My guess is that you'll want the latter, and the WiebeTech RTX220-QR fits the bill perfectly. It comes in an black aluminum enclosure with a sturdy handle on top, and could easily be mistaken for a car battery charger instead of a RAID array. Inside the black box are two shock-absorbing TrayFree drive bays; these are SATA (1 and 2) bays that you simply insert a drive into and close the door. The drive clicks into place, and you're ready to roll.
I had an opportunity to try out an RTX220-QR for a few days, and what I found was a solid, fast, and incredibly configurable array. Read more to find out what I liked (or not) about this WiebeTech device.
Construction
OK, maybe I'm making a big point out of this, but the RTX220-QR is built like a tank. That's not a bad thing -- in fact, I'd feel a heck of a lot better selling a client on this bad boy than one of the glossy RAID drives sold by other vendors. The drive bays have actual cylinder locks on them, so you can lock the drives in place for shipping or keep pesky kids from popping drives out.
The drive comes with thick rubber feet, not the little bumps that are attached to most drives these days. On the back are connectors for eSATA, FireWire 800 (backward-compatible to FW 400), and USB 2.0, a hefty power switch, and a big cooling fan.
When plugged in and switched on, the RTX220-QR is pretty quiet... until the fan kicks in. When that happens, this drive is just plain noisy. I had the drive sitting on the desktop next to my iMac, and it was distractingly loud. If you were to put it under a desk out of the way, or if you work in a noisy office, it probably wouldn't bother you.
On the front of the drive is a two line LCD display that shows the current RAID setup (the review unit came set up as RAID 1, mirrored 2 TB drives) and the status of the drive. There are also four small buttons that are used to cycle through status information on the drives that is viewable on the display. There's a simple "OK" to show the status of the top and bottom drives, the temperature of the drives, the system temperature, and the rotation speed in RPM of the fan.
Under the display are three LEDs to show Power, System, and RAID status, and each drive has a blue LED to indicate power status as well as a red LED to indicate read/write status.
Software
Two CDs are included with the RTX220-QR. The first contains product information and manuals, while the second has an OEM version of Prosoft's Data Backup software. WiebeTech also provides a Configurator app that is downloadable from their website.Given that Apple seems to be moving towards fewer SuperDrives, it might be a good idea for companies like WiebeTech to just let people download all of the software from their website rather than incurring the cost of burning a few disks that will soon be outdated.
Mirrored Drives or One Big Drive
The review unit came with two 2 TB drives installed and as I noted, it was set up as mirrored drives (RAID 1). One of the commands that is available from the button pad on the front of the device allows you to change that to a single large striped volume (RAID 0). This, of course, requires erasing the drives.When that was done, a piece of software on my Mac (Drive Genius 3) started throwing out error messages, so I quit Drive Genius and rebooted my iMac. Since the drive had been erased and needed initialization, I used Disk Utility to initialize it to one large 4 TB striped volume. The drive mounted on my desktop, and I was able to start writing to it.
Note that there is a "Configurator" application that is downloadable from the WiebeTech site. I was hoping that it could be used instead of Disk Utility to set up the drive, but basically about all it did was let me change a few settings. For example, there was a setting for "enabling cache flushing," which the Configurator said might speed up disk reads (see test results below). I was also able to enable or disable System and RAID warning and alarm buzzers, as well as play with the temperature at which the fan would turn on and off.
Relative Speed Test Results
As with a previous test drive of the OWC Mercury Elite-AL Pro Dual mini SSD, I did some relative speed tests using a 1.73 GB file with which I timed read, write and duplicate speeds. These were also compared to a Data Robotics DroboPro which is connected to my iMac via iSCSI. Here are the results:Write file to drive
OWC Pro Dual mini SSD (RAID 0, FW 800): 26.3 seconds
DroboPro (BeyondRAID, iSCSI): 34.4 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 1, FW 800): 26.1 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 0, FW 800): 26.0 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 0, FW 800): 25.5 seconds (cache flushing enabled)
Read file from drive
OWC Pro Dual mini SSD (RAID 0, FW 800): 20.7 seconds
DroboPro (BeyondRAID, iSCSI): 21.3 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 1, FW 800): 21.3 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 0, FW 800): 22.3 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 0, FW 800): 21.1 seconds (cache flushing enabled)
Duplicate file on drive
OWC Pro Dual mini SSD (RAID 0, FW 800): 46.6 seconds
DroboPro (BeyondRAID, iSCSI): 65.2 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 1, FW 800): 50.4 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 0, FW 800): 45.2 seconds
WiebeTech RTX220-QR (RAID 0, FW 800): 45.2 seconds (cache flushing enabled)
Conclusions
I was frankly impressed with the speed of this array, particularly when compared to the OWC Pro Dual mini SSD. Considering that the array contained a pair of rather standard Hitachi 7200 RPM 3.0 Gb/s SATA drives, it's amazing that it could compare speed-wise with the solid-state drives in the OWC array. The price of the RTX220-QR with the twin 2 TB drives is $863.00, while the largest OWC SSD array (twin 400 GB SSDs for a total of 800 GB RAID 0) costs a whopping $3,200.For photographers, videographers, or anyone who just needs solid and fast storage, the WiebeTech RTX220-QR might be just the answer. Other than the fan noise, I found the WiebeTech array to be a solid and fast quad-interface drive. Sure, it might not be portable enough for field work (although the handle does make it easy to carry) and it's certainly not bus-powered, but for speed and strength you can't go wrong.
Share
Categories
If you're looking for a 2-bay RAID setup for doing either mirrored (RAID 1) or striped (RAID 0) storage or backup, what do you want?...
Add a Comment
Sounds like a candidate but too late. I just bough a Synology ds-411, with same harddrives and
a speed on par with the wiebetech.
I was tempted to use iscsi but finally decided to go for gigabit ethernet as my switch, the
Syno and my iMac do support jumbo frames, I chose just Ethernet. Pity the 2010 and
2011 (?) Apples don't support this.
This nas is such a difference compared to my previous wd world edition ii nas. I can recommend everyone to buy a high-end nas. Don't go for cheap stuff if you do photography, film editing etc. Even
My itunes library witch 10000 mp3s is on my nas and runs as if it's stored locally.
No, this isn't a candidate, it's not a NAS it's entirely different.
Hey TUAW why don't you compare this to another 2 bay DAS device like the $139 Guardian Maximus which uses the exact same Oxford 936DS chipset.
I think the Guardian Maximus is also built like a tank :) Of course it doesn't have hot swap drive bays - that probably explains the $361 price difference right? Because in a 2 bay enclosure you'll be swapping those drives a few times a day, right?
Ralph
Steven, the only thing this test proves it that you really shouldn't be doing any hardware "benchmarking" or "testing".
As rgrimes said, it's quite pointless to benchmark drives if they're limited by the physical connection (in this case, firewire 800). It should even be obvious even if one's not that deep into all those technical details ;)
At raid-0, data is read from/written to both drives in parallel. So ideally, they should be twice as fast as raid-1. But in your test, the result is pretty much the same. Clear indication that the connection limiting the test.
Drobos are damn slow ... period.
March 05 2011 at 11:23 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyBenchmarking drives over FW800 is pointless, especially SSD drives. I just duplicated a 1.73GB file on my internal SSD drive in under 20 seconds, not the 46.6 seconds you came up with on the external SSD.
March 05 2011 at 11:16 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyYes it's painfully obvious that the firwire bus is the bottleneck here not the speed of the drives or raid controller. Unless you absolutely need the array immediately it's best to wait for thunderbolt Devices to become available. A raid 0 array through firwire is twice the risk of failure with minimal/no speed gain.
March 05 2011 at 11:28 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyYeah seriously this is a ridiculous advertisement, sorry I mean product review. I see you "had the opportunity to try" it, did by any chance the manufacturer give you that opportunity in exchange for some money and advertising on your site? You guys really could be a bit more honest & upfront about that you know. Pretty sleazy to try passing off product reviews as legit when they are just ads.
And if thats not the case, this is a pitiful product review. Why don't you try some real benchmarking software. Try AJA System Test, it's free and will give you far more useful results than the ones you have. If you're willing to pay some cash you can get better software than that.
But seriously, you are comparing a $500 TWO disk fw/esata enclosure to a $100 one? I get better sustained reads on my $60 oxford powered rosewill 2.5" external housing with a hard drive in it than what you are getting with your pitiful test.
TUAW sucks, why do I even come here anymore.
Rob
Given Apple's recent introduction of Thunderbolt, I will be looking for native Thunderbolt support on the external peripherals I buy from now on.
Sure it will take a while for Apple to put Thunderbolt on all its devices, and a while longer before my current gear is gradually swapped out for new equipment with Thunderbolt ports. And no doubt there will also be any number of third party Thunderbolt to FireWire 800 cable solutions.
But nevertheless, having made the decision to switch to Thunderbolt, I couldn't bring myself to go out and buy anything new that doesn't have it built in. Especially since I generally expect RAID solutions to have at least twice the lifespan of a MacBook Pro or iMac.
Admittedly I don't need a new storage solution immediately so I can afford to wait for the Thunderbolt RAID arrays to arrive in the second half of the year. Others may need one now.
I'm with Mack, but I'm hoping to see a Thunderbolt to eSATA adapter "real soon now". Most of my enclosures (including my OWC Qx2 4 drive RAID enclosure) have eSATA, as well as FW800.
The other thing is, if you're going to spend a fair chunk of change on a (physically) large and high end enclosure, it's probably worth getting a 4 drive unit so you can do RAID 5 or even RAID 10. I'm running RAID 5 (striping with 1 drive's worth of redundancy- 3TB usable storage with 4x1TB drives) on my Qx2, which I think is the sweet spot as far as performance and redundancy. I got to test the rebuild, by the way, twice, when the original Seagate drives I used in that enclosure failed. Fortunately one failed, I replaced it and rebuilt the RAID, and then the second drive failed. At that point, I pulled ALL of the Seagate drives out and replaced them with Toshiba drives. (I've had another Seagate 1tb drive fail since, that makes 3 out of 6 that have failed in the last year or so!)
Why no Ethernet connection? I'm very happy with my 4bay NetGear ReadyNAS NV+ , 4-2TB drives for about $150 less and, from reading your review, adds a whole lot more functionality (iTunes server, FTP, UPnP/DLNA and a whole lot more). It's a littly shiny but a much smaller footprint and feels very solid.
March 05 2011 at 10:57 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyRandom read/write is the true benefit of SSDs that wasn't tested here. If you were to boot from this drive, it'd be a bit faster, but not as fast as an SSD. The difference between 6.9ms and 0.1ms seek times is staggering.
March 05 2011 at 10:08 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDeals of the Day
more deals- Acoustic Research Digital Photo Frame with iPod Dock for $50 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone 4 8GB for Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint for $50 + pickup at Best Buy
- Unlocked iPhone 4S 16GB for GSM (AT&T, T-Mobile) for $619 + free shipping
- Apple iMac Core i7 Quad 3.4GHz 27" w/ 24GB RAM, 2TB HDD for $2,677 + $29 s&h
- Used Apple Magic Mouse for $36 + $4 s&h
- 9-Piece iPhone Bundle, includes 1,900mAh battery for $8 + free shipping
11 Comments